IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v11y2023i1p228-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximizing Science Outreach on Facebook: An Analysis of Scientists’ Communication Strategies in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Rauchfleisch

    (Graduate Institute of Journalism, National Taiwan University, Taiwan)

  • Jo-Ju Kao

    (Graduate Institute of Journalism, National Taiwan University, Taiwan)

  • Tzu-Hsuan Tseng

    (Graduate Institute of Journalism, National Taiwan University, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Tzu Ho

    (Graduate Institute of Journalism, National Taiwan University, Taiwan)

  • Lu-Yi Li

    (Graduate Institute of Journalism, National Taiwan University, Taiwan)

Abstract

The internet, and especially social media platforms, offer scientists new opportunities to connect with a broader public. While many studies have focused on science communication on Twitter, surprisingly few have analyzed how scientists use Facebook, even though it is an essential platform for the general public in many countries. A possible explanation for this lack of research is that scientists keep their Facebook profiles separate from their work life and are more active on Twitter in their professional roles. Our study challenges this assumption by focusing on Taiwan as a peculiar case. Due to the local culture, Twitter is less popular there, and scientists are more active on Facebook, even in their professional roles. In our study, we analyzed 35 public pages of scientists on Facebook and assessed the factors explaining the reach of their communication using content analysis in combination with a multilevel model that allowed us to test predictors on the page level, such as the number of fans, in combination with predictors on the post level, such as the complexity of the language used. Our study shows that Facebook can play an influential role in science outreach. To effectively communicate with the audience on Facebook, it is best to use strategies that appeal to new and existing followers. Posts that address current issues and include opinions are likely to be shared widely, while humor or personal self-disclosure is likely to engage the existing audience. Our study contributes to the current debate about alternatives to Twitter in science communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Rauchfleisch & Jo-Ju Kao & Tzu-Hsuan Tseng & Chia-Tzu Ho & Lu-Yi Li, 2023. "Maximizing Science Outreach on Facebook: An Analysis of Scientists’ Communication Strategies in Taiwan," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 228-239.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:228-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6080
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monika Taddicken & Anne Reif, 2020. "Between Evidence and Emotions: Emotional Appeals in Science Communication," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 101-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brigitte Huber & Luis Quesada Baena, 2023. "Women Scientists on TikTok: New Opportunities to Become Visible and Challenge Gender Stereotypes," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 240-251.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:228-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.