IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v90y2023ics0038012123002586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning and credit risk: Empirical evidence from small- and mid-sized businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Bitetto, Alessandro
  • Cerchiello, Paola
  • Filomeni, Stefano
  • Tanda, Alessandra
  • Tarantino, Barbara

Abstract

In this paper, we compare two different approaches to estimate the credit risk for small- and mid-sized businesses (SMBs), namely a classic parametric approach, by fitting an ordered probit model, and a non-parametric approach, calibrating a machine learning historical random forest (HRF) model. The models are applied to a unique and proprietary dataset comprising granular firm-level quarterly data collected from a European investment bank and an international insurance company on a sample of 464 Italian SMBs over the period 2015–2017. Results show that the HRF approach outperforms the traditional ordered probit model, highlighting how advanced estimation methodologies that use machine learning techniques can be successfully implemented to predict SMB credit risk, i.e. when facing high asymmetries of information. Moreover, by using Shapley values, we are able to assess the relevance of each variable in predicting SMB credit risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Bitetto, Alessandro & Cerchiello, Paola & Filomeni, Stefano & Tanda, Alessandra & Tarantino, Barbara, 2023. "Machine learning and credit risk: Empirical evidence from small- and mid-sized businesses," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s0038012123002586
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123002586
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Credit rating; SMB; Historical random forest; Machine learning; Relationship banking; Invoice lending;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s0038012123002586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.