IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of site selection, opportunity costs and transportation costs on bioethanol production


  • De Laporte, Aaron V.
  • Ripplinger, David G.


Policy and legislative initiatives, along with volatility in agricultural commodity prices, have encouraged farmers to consider alternative crops, such as potential advanced biomass feedstock for bioenergy, including energy beets. This paper employs an integrated biophysical, economic and transportation GIS-based model to examine the production of beet-bioethanol from five sites in North Dakota. The study finds that beet-bioethanol could provide net benefits to farmers and ethanol producers in the state, under current market conditions, but only if the bioethanol plant site is carefully selected. Specifically, a 75 million litre plant could produce a profit at capacity offering a beet price of $33/t at an ethanol price of $0.40/L at one of five analyzed sites. Policy initiatives that increase the price of ethanol could make production attractive at all of the investigated sites. Both increased agricultural opportunity costs and decreased transportation costs move feedstock production away from the plant site to higher quality lands. This result implies that, in some cases, to pursue biomass production on marginal lands, policy initiatives would need to increase transportation costs, lower agricultural commodity prices, or increase biomass prices. Therefore, assumptions about land quality should be carefully considered in biomass and bioenergy policy.

Suggested Citation

  • De Laporte, Aaron V. & Ripplinger, David G., 2019. "The effects of site selection, opportunity costs and transportation costs on bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 73-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:73-82
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.016

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Valcu-Lisman, Adriana M. & Kling, Catherine L. & Gassman, Philip W., 2016. "The Optimality of Using Marginal Land for Bioenergy Crops: Tradeoffs between Food, Fuel, and Environmental Services," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 217-245, August.
    2. Bangsund, Dean A. & Hodur, Nancy M. & Leistritz, F. Larry, 2012. "Economic Contribution of the Sugarbeet Industry to Eastern Montana and Western North Dakota," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 121713, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    3. Martinsen, Dag & Funk, Carolin & Linssen, Jochen, 2010. "Biomass for transportation fuels--A cost-effective option for the German energy supply?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 128-140, January.
    4. Bangsund, Dean A. & Hodur, Nancy M. & Leistritz, F. Larry, 2012. "Economic Contribution of the Sugarbeet Industry in Minnesota and North Dakota," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 121494, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    5. Haankuku, Choolwe & Epplin, Francis M. & Kakani, Gopal V., 2015. "Energy Sugar Beets to Biofuel: Field to Fuel Production System and Cost Estimates," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196777, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Shu, Kesheng & Schneider, Uwe A. & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2017. "Optimizing the bioenergy industry infrastructure: Transportation networks and bioenergy plant locations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 247-261.
    7. Hu, Hao & Lin, Tao & Wang, Shaowen & Rodriguez, Luis F., 2017. "A cyberGIS approach to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in biomass supply chain optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 26-40.
    8. De Laporte, Aaron V. & Weersink, Alfons J. & McKenney, Daniel W., 2016. "Effects of supply chain structure and biomass prices on bioenergy feedstock supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1053-1064.
    9. Maung, Thein A. & Gustafson, Cole R. & Saxowsky, David M. & Nowatzki, John & Miljkovic, Tatjana & Ripplinger, David, 2013. "The logistics of supplying single vs. multi-crop cellulosic feedstocks to a biorefinery in southeast North Dakota," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 229-238.
    10. Bryngelsson, David K. & Lindgren, Kristian, 2013. "Why large-scale bioenergy production on marginal land is unfeasible: A conceptual partial equilibrium analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 454-466.
    11. Perrin, Aurelie & Wohlfahrt, Julie & Morandi, Fabiana & Østergård, Hanne & Flatberg, Truls & De La Rua, Cristina & Bjørkvoll, Thor & Gabrielle, Benoit, 2017. "Integrated design and sustainable assessment of innovative biomass supply chains: A case-study on miscanthus in France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 66-77.
    12. Foteinis, Spyros & Kouloumpis, Victor & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2011. "Life cycle analysis for bioethanol production from sugar beet crops in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 4834-4841, September.
    13. Mirkouei, Amin & Haapala, Karl R. & Sessions, John & Murthy, Ganti S., 2017. "A mixed biomass-based energy supply chain for enhancing economic and environmental sustainability benefits: A multi-criteria decision making framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1088-1101.
    14. Swinton, Scott M. & Babcock, Bruce A. & James, Laura K. & Bandaru, Varaprasad, 2011. "Higher US crop prices trigger little area expansion so marginal land for biofuel crops is limited," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5254-5258, September.
    15. Wang, Yu & Ebadian, Mahmood & Sokhansanj, Shahab & Webb, Erin & Lau, Anthony, 2017. "Impact of the biorefinery size on the logistics of corn stover supply – A scenario analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 360-376.
    16. Gautam, Shuva & LeBel, Luc & Carle, Marc-André, 2017. "Supply chain model to assess the feasibility of incorporating a terminal between forests and biorefineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 377-384.
    17. Boldrin, Alessio & Baral, Khagendra Raj & Fitamo, Temesgen & Vazifehkhoran, Ali Heidarzadeh & Jensen, Ida Græsted & Kjærgaard, Ida & Lyng, Kari-Anne & van Nguyen, Quan & Nielsen, Lise Skovsgaard & Tri, 2016. "Optimised biogas production from the co-digestion of sugar beet with pig slurry: Integrating energy, GHG and economic accounting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 606-617.
    18. Boukherroub, Tasseda & LeBel, Luc & Lemieux, Sébastien, 2017. "An integrated wood pellet supply chain development: Selecting among feedstock sources and a range of operating scales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 385-400.
    19. Baey, Charlotte & Didier, Anne & Lemaire, Sébastien & Maupas, Fabienne & Cournède, Paul-Henry, 2014. "Parametrization of five classical plant growth models applied to sugar beet and comparison of their predictive capacity on root yield and total biomass," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 11-20.
    20. Barham, Bradford L & Mooney, Daniel F. & Swinton, Scott M., 2016. "Inconvenient Truths about Landowner (Un)Willingness to Grow Dedicated Bioenergy Crops," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(4), pages 1-8, November.
    21. de Jong, Sierk & Hoefnagels, Ric & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Pettersson, Karin & Faaij, André & Junginger, Martin, 2017. "Cost optimization of biofuel production – The impact of scale, integration, transport and supply chain configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1055-1070.
    22. Auburger, Sebastian & Jacobs, Anna & Märländer, Bernward & Bahrs, Enno, 2016. "Economic optimization of feedstock mix for energy production with biogas technology in Germany with a special focus on sugar beets – Effects on greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-11.
    23. Shortall, O.K., 2013. "“Marginal land” for energy crops: Exploring definitions and embedded assumptions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 19-27.
    24. Ng, Rex T.L. & Maravelias, Christos T., 2017. "Economic and energetic analysis of biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1571-1582.
    25. Salazar-Ordóñez, Melania & Pérez-Hernández, Pedro P. & Martín-Lozano, José M., 2013. "Sugar beet for bioethanol production: An approach based on environmental agricultural outputs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 662-668.
    26. repec:wly:agribz:v:33:y:2017:i:3:p:339-357 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. repec:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:15:p:3020-:d:255030 is not listed on IDEAS


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:73-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.