IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v290y2014icp11-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parametrization of five classical plant growth models applied to sugar beet and comparison of their predictive capacity on root yield and total biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Baey, Charlotte
  • Didier, Anne
  • Lemaire, Sébastien
  • Maupas, Fabienne
  • Cournède, Paul-Henry

Abstract

A wide range of models have been proposed and developed for modelling sugar beet growth, each of them with different degrees of complexity and modelling assumptions. Many of them are used to predict crop production or yield, even when they were not originally designed for this purpose, and even though their predictive capacity has never been properly evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Baey, Charlotte & Didier, Anne & Lemaire, Sébastien & Maupas, Fabienne & Cournède, Paul-Henry, 2014. "Parametrization of five classical plant growth models applied to sugar beet and comparison of their predictive capacity on root yield and total biomass," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 11-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:290:y:2014:i:c:p:11-20
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013005395
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Qiong-Li & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Mathieu, Amélie, 2012. "An efficient computational method for global sensitivity analysis and its application to tree growth modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 35-43.
    2. Baey, Charlotte & Didier, Anne & Lemaire, Sébastien & Maupas, Fabienne & Cournède, Paul-Henry, 2013. "Modelling the interindividual variability of organogenesis in sugar beet populations using a hierarchical segmented model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 56-63.
    3. Cariboni, J. & Gatelli, D. & Liska, R. & Saltelli, A., 2007. "The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 167-182.
    4. Mailhol, Jean Claude & Olufayo, Ayorinde A. & Ruelle, Pierre, 1997. "Sorghum and sunflower evapotranspiration and yield from simulated leaf area index," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1-2), pages 167-182, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Laporte, Aaron V. & Ripplinger, David G., 2019. "The effects of site selection, opportunity costs and transportation costs on bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 73-82.
    2. Anar, Mohammad J. & Lin, Zhulu & Hoogenboom, Gerrit & Shelia, Vakhtang & Batchelor, William D. & Teboh, Jasper M. & Ostlie, Michael & Schatz, Blaine G. & Khan, Mohamed, 2019. "Modeling growth, development and yield of Sugarbeet using DSSAT," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 58-70.
    3. Hamidreza Kamali & Shahrokh Zand-Parsa, 2017. "Estimation of Sugar Beet Yield and its Dry Matter Partitioning Under Different Irrigation and Nitrogen Levels," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 143-143, September.
    4. Khaembah, E.N. & Brown, H.E. & Zyskowski, R. & Chakwizira, E. & de Ruiter, J.M. & Teixeira, E.I., 2017. "Development of a fodder beet potential yield model in the next generation APSIM," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 23-38.
    5. De Laporte, Aaron & Ripplinger, David, 2016. "The effects of opportunity costs, supply chain logistics and carbon balances on advanced biofuel production," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235852, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julien Sainte-Marie & Paul-Henry Cournède, 2019. "Insights of Global Sensitivity Analysis in Biological Models with Dependent Parameters," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 92-111, March.
    2. Imron, Muhammad Ali & Gergs, Andre & Berger, Uta, 2012. "Structure and sensitivity analysis of individual-based predator–prey models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 71-81.
    3. Frank H. Koch & Denys Yemshanov & Daniel W. McKenney & William D. Smith, 2009. "Evaluating Critical Uncertainty Thresholds in a Spatial Model of Forest Pest Invasion Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9), pages 1227-1241, September.
    4. Chu-Agor, M.L. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Kiker, G.A. & Aiello-Lammens, M.E. & Akçakaya, H.R. & Convertino, M. & Linkov, I., 2012. "Simulating the fate of Florida Snowy Plovers with sea-level rise: Exploring research and management priorities with a global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 33-47.
    5. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.
    6. Shuang Liu & Yuru Gao & Huilin Lang & Yong Liu & Hong Zhang, 2022. "Effects of Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage Systems on Maize ( Zea mays L.) Growth and Yield, Soil Structure, and Water in Loess Plateau of China: Field Experiment and Modeling Studies," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Mubarak, Ibrahim & Mailhol, Jean Claude & Angulo-Jaramillo, Rafael & Bouarfa, Sami & Ruelle, Pierre, 2009. "Effect of temporal variability in soil hydraulic properties on simulated water transfer under high-frequency drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1547-1559, November.
    8. Wu, Lin & Le Dimet, François-Xavier & de Reffye, Philippe & Hu, Bao-Gang & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Kang, Meng-Zhen, 2012. "An optimal control methodology for plant growth—Case study of a water supply problem of sunflower," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(5), pages 909-923.
    9. Battude, Marjorie & Al Bitar, Ahmad & Brut, Aurore & Tallec, Tiphaine & Huc, Mireille & Cros, Jérôme & Weber, Jean-Jacques & Lhuissier, Ludovic & Simonneaux, Vincent & Demarez, Valérie, 2017. "Modeling water needs and total irrigation depths of maize crop in the south west of France using high spatial and temporal resolution satellite imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 123-136.
    10. Lola Gilbert & Tiphaine Jeanniard-du-Dot & Matthieu Authier & Tiphaine Chouvelon & Jérôme Spitz, 2023. "Composition of cetacean communities worldwide shapes their contribution to ocean nutrient cycling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Wu, Qiong-Li & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Mathieu, Amélie, 2012. "An efficient computational method for global sensitivity analysis and its application to tree growth modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 35-43.
    12. Song, Xiaodong & Bryan, Brett A. & Almeida, Auro C. & Paul, Keryn I. & Zhao, Gang & Ren, Yin, 2013. "Time-dependent sensitivity of a process-based ecological model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 114-123.
    13. Link, Jason S. & Pranovi, Fabio & Libralato, Simone, 2022. "Simulations and interpretations of cumulative trophic theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    14. Carus, Jana & Heuner, Maike & Paul, Maike & Schröder, Boris, 2017. "Which factors and processes drive the spatio-temporal dynamics of brackish marshes?—Insights from development and parameterisation of a mechanistic vegetation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 122-136.
    15. Pal, Saheb & Ghosh, Indrajit, 2023. "Dynamics of a coupled socio-environmental model: An application to global CO2 emissions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    16. Amir Mokhtari & Jane M. Van Doren, 2019. "An Agent‐Based Model for Pathogen Persistence and Cross‐Contamination Dynamics in a Food Facility," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 992-1021, May.
    17. Dueri, Sibylle & Faugeras, Blaise & Maury, Olivier, 2012. "Modelling the skipjack tuna dynamics in the Indian Ocean with APECOSM-E – Part 2: Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 55-64.
    18. Vinatier, Fabrice & Tixier, Philippe & Le Page, Christophe & Duyck, Pierre-François & Lescourret, Françoise, 2009. "COSMOS, a spatially explicit model to simulate the epidemiology of Cosmopolites sordidus in banana fields," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(18), pages 2244-2254.
    19. Huber, Nica & Bugmann, Harald & Lafond, Valentine, 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis of a dynamic vegetation model: Model sensitivity depends on successional time, climate and competitive interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 377-390.
    20. Gilardelli, Carlo & Confalonieri, Roberto & Cappelli, Giovanni Alessandro & Bellocchi, Gianni, 2018. "Sensitivity of WOFOST-based modelling solutions to crop parameters under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:290:y:2014:i:c:p:11-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.