IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v224y2012i1p33-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating the fate of Florida Snowy Plovers with sea-level rise: Exploring research and management priorities with a global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chu-Agor, M.L.
  • Muñoz-Carpena, R.
  • Kiker, G.A.
  • Aiello-Lammens, M.E.
  • Akçakaya, H.R.
  • Convertino, M.
  • Linkov, I.

Abstract

Changes in coastal habitats due to sea-level rise provide an uncertain, yet significant threat to shoreline dependent birds. Rising sea levels can cause habitat fragmentation and loss which can result in considerable reduction in their foraging and nesting areas. Computational models and their algorithmic assumptions play an integral role in exploring potential mitigation responses to uncertain and potentially adverse ecological outcomes. The presence of uncertainty in metapopulation models is widely acknowledged but seldom considered in their development and evaluation, specifically the effects of uncertain model inputs on the model outputs. This paper was aimed to (1) quantify the contribution of each uncertain input factor to the uncertainty in the output of a metapopulation model which evaluated the effects of long-term sea-level rise on the population of Snowy Plovers (Charadrius alexandrinus) found in the Gulf Coast of Florida, and (2) determine the ranges of model inputs that produced a specific output for the purpose of formulating environmental management decisions. This was carried out by employing global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis (GSA) using two generic (model independent) methods, the qualitative screening Morris method and a quantitative variance-based Sobol’ method coupled with Monte Carlo filtering. The analyses were applied to three density dependence scenarios: assuming a ceiling-type density dependence, assuming a contest-type density dependence, and assuming that density dependence is uncertain as to being ceiling- or contest-dependent. The sources of uncertainty in the outputs depended strongly on the type of density dependence considered in the model. In general, uncertainty in the outputs highly depended on the uncertainty in stage matrix elements (fecundity, adult survival, and juvenile survival), dispersal rate from central areas with low current populations (the “Big Bend” area of Florida) to the northern, panhandle populations, the maximum growth rate, and density dependence type. Our results showed that increasing the maximum growth rate to a value of 1.2 or larger will increase the final average population of Snowy Plovers assuming a contest-type density dependence. Results suggest that studies that further quantify which density dependence relationship best describes Snowy Plover population dynamics should be conducted since this is the main driver of uncertainty in model outcomes. Furthermore, investigating the presence of Snowy Plovers in the Big Bend region may be important for providing connection between the panhandle and peninsula populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chu-Agor, M.L. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Kiker, G.A. & Aiello-Lammens, M.E. & Akçakaya, H.R. & Convertino, M. & Linkov, I., 2012. "Simulating the fate of Florida Snowy Plovers with sea-level rise: Exploring research and management priorities with a global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 33-47.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:224:y:2012:i:1:p:33-47
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.10.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380011005138
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.10.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cariboni, J. & Gatelli, D. & Liska, R. & Saltelli, A., 2007. "The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 167-182.
    2. Tibor F. Liska, 2007. "The Liska model," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 29(3), pages 363-381, December.
    3. Sumeet R. Patil & H. Christopher Frey, 2004. "Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods Based on Applications to a Food Safety Risk Assessment Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 573-585, June.
    4. Saltelli, Andrea & Campolongo, Francesca & Cariboni, Jessica, 2009. "Screening important inputs in models with strong interaction properties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1149-1155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan Tong & Haipeng Niu & Liangxin Fan, 2016. "Willingness of Farmers to Transform Vacant Rural Residential Land into Cultivated Land in a Major Grain-Producing Area of Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Perz, Stephen G. & Muñoz-Carpena, Rafael & Kiker, Gregory & Holt, Robert D., 2013. "Evaluating ecological resilience with global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 174-186.
    3. Matteo Convertino & L James Valverde Jr, 2013. "Portfolio Decision Analysis Framework for Value-Focused Ecosystem Management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Mark Burgman & James Franklin & Keith R. Hayes & Geoffrey R. Hosack & Gareth W. Peters & Scott A. Sisson, 2012. "Modeling Extreme Risks in Ecology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(11), pages 1956-1966, November.
    5. Linhoss, Anna C. & Kiker, Gregory A. & Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E. & Chu-Agor, Ma. Librada & Convertino, Matteo & Muñoz-Carpena, Rafael & Fischer, Richard & Linkov, Igor, 2013. "Decision analysis for species preservation under sea-level rise," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 264-272.
    6. Convertino, Matteo & Welle, Paul & Muñoz-Carpena, Rafael & Kiker, Gregory A. & Chu-Agor, Ma.L. & Fischer, Richard A. & Linkov, Igor, 2012. "Epistemic uncertainty in predicting shorebird biogeography affected by sea-level rise," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Gieder, Katherina D. & Karpanty, Sarah M. & Fraser, James D. & Catlin, Daniel H. & Gutierrez, Benjamin T. & Plant, Nathaniel G. & Turecek, Aaron M. & Robert Thieler, E., 2014. "A Bayesian network approach to predicting nest presence of the federally-threatened piping plover (Charadrius melodus) using barrier island features," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 276(C), pages 38-50.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanqing Ma & Chunfeng Ma & Xin Li & Wenping Yuan & Zhengjia Liu & Gaofeng Zhu, 2020. "Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses of Flux-based Ecosystem Model towards Improvement of Forest GPP Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Francisco A. Buendia-Hernandez & Maria J. Ortiz Bevia & Francisco J. Alvarez-Garcia & Antonio Ruizde Elvira, 2022. "Sensitivity of a Dynamic Model of Air Traffic Emissions to Technological and Environmental Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Lorscheid, Iris & Meyer, Matthias, 2016. "Divide and conquer: Configuring submodels for valid and efficient analyses of complex simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 152-161.
    4. Kanapaux, William & Kiker, Gregory A., 2013. "Development and testing of an object-oriented model for adaptively managing human disturbance of least tern (Sternula antillarum) nesting habitat," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 64-77.
    5. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.
    6. Gregory Hill & Steven Kolmes & Michael Humphreys & Rebecca McLain & Eric T. Jones, 2019. "Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 170-186, June.
    7. Wernsdörfer, H. & Rossi, V. & Cornu, G. & Oddou-Muratorio, S. & Gourlet-Fleury, S., 2008. "Impact of uncertainty in tree mortality on the predictions of a tropical forest dynamics model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 290-306.
    8. Rougier, Thibaud & Drouineau, Hilaire & Dumoulin, Nicolas & Faure, Thierry & Deffuant, Guillaume & Rochard, Eric & Lambert, Patrick, 2014. "The GR3D model, a tool to explore the Global Repositioning Dynamics of Diadromous fish Distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 283(C), pages 31-44.
    9. Pal, Saheb & Ghosh, Indrajit, 2023. "Dynamics of a coupled socio-environmental model: An application to global CO2 emissions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    10. Gilardelli, Carlo & Confalonieri, Roberto & Cappelli, Giovanni Alessandro & Bellocchi, Gianni, 2018. "Sensitivity of WOFOST-based modelling solutions to crop parameters under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Priyadarshi, Anupam & Chandra, Ram & Kishi, Michio J. & Smith, S.Lan & Yamazaki, Hidekatsu, 2022. "Understanding plankton ecosystem dynamics under realistic micro-scale variability requires modeling at least three trophic levels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    12. Cadero, A. & Aubry, A. & Brun, F. & Dourmad, J.Y. & Salaün, Y. & Garcia-Launay, F., 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis of a pig fattening unit model simulating technico-economic performance and environmental impacts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 221-229.
    13. Ratnarajah, Lavenia & Melbourne-Thomas, Jessica & Marzloff, Martin P. & Lannuzel, Delphine & Meiners, Klaus M. & Chever, Fanny & Nicol, Stephen & Bowie, Andrew R., 2016. "A preliminary model of iron fertilisation by baleen whales and Antarctic krill in the Southern Ocean: Sensitivity of primary productivity estimates to parameter uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 203-212.
    14. Sinan Xiao & Zhenzhou Lu & Pan Wang, 2018. "Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Distance Components Decomposition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2703-2721, December.
    15. Yi, Xuan & Zou, Rui & Guo, Huaicheng, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis of a three-dimensional nutrients-algae dynamic model for a large shallow lake," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 327(C), pages 74-84.
    16. Marzloff, Martin P. & Johnson, Craig R. & Little, L. Rich & Soulié, Jean-Christophe & Ling, Scott D. & Frusher, Stewart D., 2013. "Sensitivity analysis and pattern-oriented validation of TRITON, a model with alternative community states: Insights on temperate rocky reefs dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 16-32.
    17. Rouger, Baptiste & Goldringer, Isabelle & Barbillon, Pierre & Miramon, Anne & Naino Jika, Abdel Kader & Thomas, Mathieu, 2023. "Sensitivity analysis of a crop metapopulation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    18. Bourhis, Yoann & Poggi, Sylvain & Mammeri, Youcef & Cortesero, Anne-Marie & Le Ralec, Anne & Parisey, Nicolas, 2015. "Perception-based foraging for competing resources: Assessing pest population dynamics at the landscape scale from heterogeneous resource distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 211-221.
    19. Bar Massada, Avi & Carmel, Yohay, 2008. "Incorporating output variance in local sensitivity analysis for stochastic models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 463-467.
    20. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2010. "A Methodology for Determining Interactions in Probabilistic Safety Assessment Models by Varying One Parameter at a Time," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 385-399, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:224:y:2012:i:1:p:33-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.