IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v218y2008i3p290-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of uncertainty in tree mortality on the predictions of a tropical forest dynamics model

Author

Listed:
  • Wernsdörfer, H.
  • Rossi, V.
  • Cornu, G.
  • Oddou-Muratorio, S.
  • Gourlet-Fleury, S.

Abstract

A sensitivity analysis on the impact of uncertainty in tree mortality on the predictions of an individual-based spatially explicit forest dynamics model (SELVA) was performed. The model was developed to investigate the impact of felling (logging) on the demography and structure of tree populations in tropical forests (French Guiana). This study addressed questions about (1) the relative impact on model predictions of uncertainty in mortality processes at different stages of tree development; (2) the interactions between the mortality processes and different felling regimes; and (3) the impact of different felling regimes on the demography and structure of tree populations, taking account of answers to (1) and (2). A global approach of sensitivity analysis based on the decomposition of the output variance was applied. Based on prior knowledge about model uncertainties, mortality processes at the stages germinated seed, standing juvenile, standing adult, and tree-fall were focused as input factors. The input factors were multivariate mortality sub-models involving several parameters with no explicit biological meaning. Thus, an approach based on confidence ellipses of parameter estimates was used to vary input factors homogenously, so that the impact of different input factors on a given model output could be compared. As outputs, the numbers of living, dead and recruited trees, and the tree diameter structure were analysed over 336 years of simulation. An additional local sensitivity analysis provided deeper insights into the relationships between model input and output. The results showed that standing juvenile mortality was the largest source of uncertainty, ahead of standing adult mortality, germinated seed mortality and tree-fall. Moreover, mainly standing juvenile mortality interacted with the felling regime, resulting in changes of the diameter structure of the studied tree population (Dicorynia guianensis Amshoff, Caesalpiniaceae). Felling all trees ≥60cm diameter of that population every 42 or 84 years was found not sustainable in the long term. But enhancing the description of standing juvenile mortality may alter these predictions. As major conclusions, (i) standing mortality at the juvenile stage should be modelled thoroughly to ensure reliable long-term predictions, and (ii) the interaction of standing juvenile mortality and the felling regime may be an important relationship to be considered in the evaluation of the sustainability of felling regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Wernsdörfer, H. & Rossi, V. & Cornu, G. & Oddou-Muratorio, S. & Gourlet-Fleury, S., 2008. "Impact of uncertainty in tree mortality on the predictions of a tropical forest dynamics model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 290-306.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:218:y:2008:i:3:p:290-306
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008003645
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Picard, Nicolas & Mortier, Frédéric & Chagneau, Pierrette, 2008. "Influence of estimators of the vital rates in the stock recovery rate when using matrix models for tropical rainforests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 349-360.
    2. Köhler, Peter & Huth, Andreas, 2007. "Impacts of recruitment limitation and canopy disturbance on tropical tree species richness," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 511-517.
    3. Tibor F. Liska, 2007. "The Liska model," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 29(3), pages 363-381, December.
    4. Cariboni, J. & Gatelli, D. & Liska, R. & Saltelli, A., 2007. "The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 167-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yuting & Cournède, Paul-Henry, 2014. "Data assimilation to reduce uncertainty of crop model prediction with Convolution Particle Filtering," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 165-177.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco A. Buendia-Hernandez & Maria J. Ortiz Bevia & Francisco J. Alvarez-Garcia & Antonio Ruizde Elvira, 2022. "Sensitivity of a Dynamic Model of Air Traffic Emissions to Technological and Environmental Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Lorscheid, Iris & Meyer, Matthias, 2016. "Divide and conquer: Configuring submodels for valid and efficient analyses of complex simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 152-161.
    3. Kanapaux, William & Kiker, Gregory A., 2013. "Development and testing of an object-oriented model for adaptively managing human disturbance of least tern (Sternula antillarum) nesting habitat," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 64-77.
    4. Chu-Agor, M.L. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Kiker, G.A. & Aiello-Lammens, M.E. & Akçakaya, H.R. & Convertino, M. & Linkov, I., 2012. "Simulating the fate of Florida Snowy Plovers with sea-level rise: Exploring research and management priorities with a global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 33-47.
    5. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.
    6. Gregory Hill & Steven Kolmes & Michael Humphreys & Rebecca McLain & Eric T. Jones, 2019. "Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 170-186, June.
    7. Rougier, Thibaud & Drouineau, Hilaire & Dumoulin, Nicolas & Faure, Thierry & Deffuant, Guillaume & Rochard, Eric & Lambert, Patrick, 2014. "The GR3D model, a tool to explore the Global Repositioning Dynamics of Diadromous fish Distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 283(C), pages 31-44.
    8. Pal, Saheb & Ghosh, Indrajit, 2023. "Dynamics of a coupled socio-environmental model: An application to global CO2 emissions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    9. Gilardelli, Carlo & Confalonieri, Roberto & Cappelli, Giovanni Alessandro & Bellocchi, Gianni, 2018. "Sensitivity of WOFOST-based modelling solutions to crop parameters under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Priyadarshi, Anupam & Chandra, Ram & Kishi, Michio J. & Smith, S.Lan & Yamazaki, Hidekatsu, 2022. "Understanding plankton ecosystem dynamics under realistic micro-scale variability requires modeling at least three trophic levels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    11. Cadero, A. & Aubry, A. & Brun, F. & Dourmad, J.Y. & Salaün, Y. & Garcia-Launay, F., 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis of a pig fattening unit model simulating technico-economic performance and environmental impacts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 221-229.
    12. Ratnarajah, Lavenia & Melbourne-Thomas, Jessica & Marzloff, Martin P. & Lannuzel, Delphine & Meiners, Klaus M. & Chever, Fanny & Nicol, Stephen & Bowie, Andrew R., 2016. "A preliminary model of iron fertilisation by baleen whales and Antarctic krill in the Southern Ocean: Sensitivity of primary productivity estimates to parameter uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 203-212.
    13. Yi, Xuan & Zou, Rui & Guo, Huaicheng, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis of a three-dimensional nutrients-algae dynamic model for a large shallow lake," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 327(C), pages 74-84.
    14. Rouger, Baptiste & Goldringer, Isabelle & Barbillon, Pierre & Miramon, Anne & Naino Jika, Abdel Kader & Thomas, Mathieu, 2023. "Sensitivity analysis of a crop metapopulation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    15. Bourhis, Yoann & Poggi, Sylvain & Mammeri, Youcef & Cortesero, Anne-Marie & Le Ralec, Anne & Parisey, Nicolas, 2015. "Perception-based foraging for competing resources: Assessing pest population dynamics at the landscape scale from heterogeneous resource distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 211-221.
    16. Bar Massada, Avi & Carmel, Yohay, 2008. "Incorporating output variance in local sensitivity analysis for stochastic models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 463-467.
    17. Giménez-Romero, Àlex & Grau, Amalia & Hendriks, Iris E. & Matias, Manuel A., 2021. "Modelling parasite-produced marine diseases: The case of the mass mortality event of Pinna nobilis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 459(C).
    18. Hanqing Ma & Chunfeng Ma & Xin Li & Wenping Yuan & Zhengjia Liu & Gaofeng Zhu, 2020. "Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses of Flux-based Ecosystem Model towards Improvement of Forest GPP Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Zhang, Wang & Tian, Yong & Sun, Zan & Zheng, Chunmiao, 2021. "How does plastic film mulching affect crop water productivity in an arid river basin?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    20. Wu, Wenbin & Shibasaki, Ryosuke & Yang, Peng & Tan, Guoxin & Matsumura, Kan-ichiro & Sugimoto, Kenji, 2007. "Global-scale modelling of future changes in sown areas of major crops," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 378-390.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:218:y:2008:i:3:p:290-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.