IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v121y2023ics0306919223001483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value of certification in collective reputation crises: Evidence from Chinese dairy firms

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Yu
  • Zhou, Jiehong
  • Ye, Juntao

Abstract

Collective reputation crisis incidents imply considerable negative within-sector spillovers. Understanding how to reduce such negative spillovers is crucial for industry development, especially in the food industry where information is asymmetric. As certification is an important tool to reduce information asymmetry in product quality, it’s role in reducing such spillovers needs to be discussed systematically. First, we use an analytical model to reveal the effects and mechanisms by which certification helps dairy firms resist the negative spillovers of collective reputation crises. Next, we study the effects of certification in the context of a large-scale dairy scandal in China. Using firm-level microdata, we empirically analyze the effects of adopting certification on improving innocent firms’ return on capital. The results show that in the year of the scandal, the return on capital of firms without certification was significantly negatively affected while that of firms with certification was not affected. In the wake of the scandal, adopting certification helped dairy firms effectively improve their return on capital, but these effects diminished over time. In addition, the effects are larger for firms with lower established reputations, such as new and non-state-owned dairy firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Yu & Zhou, Jiehong & Ye, Juntao, 2023. "Value of certification in collective reputation crises: Evidence from Chinese dairy firms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:121:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223001483
    DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001483
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:121:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223001483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.