IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pacecr/v29y2024i3p397-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food safety, voluntary recall and firm reputation

Author

Listed:
  • Jianyu Yu
  • Dongling Cai
  • Qiang Gong
  • Jiaying Mo

Abstract

Product recalls are direct remedies for producers in case of food safety problems. Unlike in the United States or other developed countries, in China, voluntary recalls are rarely documented in the food sector. The purpose of this paper is to address two questions: (1) why do firms adopt different recall strategies in different countries; (2) under what circumstances can voluntary recall help firms build up their food safety reputation? Based on the theory of collective reputation, we develop a dynamic model to incorporate firms' recall strategy and investigate the impact of such a strategy on industry collective reputation. The model takes into account production hazards: producers' lapses in food safety despite good‐faith efforts. Our results show that voluntary recall helps a firm to maintain a good historical record. Hence, firms are likely to achieve a high level of collective reputation under voluntary recall. However, a firm is willing to initiate voluntary recall only if the collective reputation is high enough. This explains the current situation in China: as consumers show little trust (belief in collective reputation is low), firms cannot recover the recall loss and thus have no incentive to initiate a voluntary recall.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianyu Yu & Dongling Cai & Qiang Gong & Jiaying Mo, 2024. "Food safety, voluntary recall and firm reputation," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 397-418, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:29:y:2024:i:3:p:397-418
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-0106.12452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12452
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-0106.12452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:29:y:2024:i:3:p:397-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1361-374X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.