IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijrema/v38y2021i3p770-791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machines learn neuromarketing: Improving preference prediction from self-reports using multiple EEG measures and machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Hakim, Adam
  • Klorfeld, Shira
  • Sela, Tal
  • Friedman, Doron
  • Shabat-Simon, Maytal
  • Levy, Dino J.

Abstract

A basic aim of marketing research is to predict consumers’ preferences and the success of marketing campaigns at the population-level. However, traditional marketing tools have various limitations, calling for novel measures to improve predictive power. In this study, we use multiple types of measures extracted from electroencephalography (EEG) recordings and machine learning (ML) algorithms to improve preference prediction based on self-reports alone. Subjects watched video commercials of six food products as we recorded their EEG activity, after which they responded to a questionnaire that served as a self-report benchmark measure. Thereafter, subjects made binary choices over the food products. We attempted to predict within-sample and population level preferences, based on subjects’ questionnaire responses and EEG measures extracted during the commercial viewings. We reached 68.5% accuracy in predicting between subjects’ most and least preferred products, improving accuracy by 4.07 percentage points compared to prediction based on self-reports alone. Additionally, EEG measures improved within-sample prediction of all six products by 20%, resulting in only a 1.91 root mean squared error (RMSE) compared to 2.39 RMSE with questionnaire-based prediction alone. Moreover, at the population level, assessed using YouTube metrics and an online questionnaire, EEG measures increased prediction by 12.7% and 12.6% respectively, compared to only a questionnaire-based prediction. We found that the most predictive EEG measures were frontal powers in the alpha band, hemispheric asymmetry in the beta band, and inter-subject correlation in delta and alpha bands. In summary, our novel approach, employing multiple types of EEG measures and ML models, offers marketing practitioners and researchers a valuable tool for predicting individual preferences and commercials’ success in the real world.

Suggested Citation

  • Hakim, Adam & Klorfeld, Shira & Sela, Tal & Friedman, Doron & Shabat-Simon, Maytal & Levy, Dino J., 2021. "Machines learn neuromarketing: Improving preference prediction from self-reports using multiple EEG measures and machine learning," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 770-791.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:770-791
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.10.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811620301038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.10.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim C. Hesterberg, 2015. "What Teachers Should Know About the Bootstrap: Resampling in the Undergraduate Statistics Curriculum," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 371-386, November.
    2. Samuel B. Barnett & Moran Cerf, 2017. "A Ticket for Your Thoughts: Method for Predicting Content Recall and Sales Using Neural Similarity of Moviegoers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 160-181.
    3. Allan P. O. Williams & Sally Woodward, 1994. "Competences Underlying Effective Role Performance," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Competitive Consultant, chapter 5, pages 49-66, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Abbie Griffin & John R. Hauser, 1993. "The Voice of the Customer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27.
    5. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    6. Chan, Y. M. & He, Xuming, 1994. "A simple and competitive estimator of location," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 137-142, January.
    7. Bruce Buchanan & Pamela W. Henderson, 1992. "Assessing the Bias of Preference, Detection, and Identification Measures of Discrimination Ability in Product Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 64-75.
    8. Fisher, Robert J, 1993. "Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 303-315, September.
    9. Ale Smidts & Ming Hsu & Alan Sanfey & Maarten Boksem & Richard Ebstein & Scott Huettel & Joe Kable & Uma Karmarkar & Shinobu Kitayama & Brian Knutson & Israel Liberzon & Terry Lohrenz & Mirre Stallen , 2014. "Advancing consumer neuroscience," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 257-267, September.
    10. Allan P. O. Williams & Sally Woodward, 1994. "The Competitive Consultant," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-13384-0.
    11. Hang-Yee Chan & Ale Smidts & Vincent C. Schoots & Roeland C. Dietvorst & Maarten A. S. Boksem, 2019. "Neural similarity at temporal lobe and cerebellum predicts out-of-sample preference and recall for video stimuli," Post-Print hal-03188209, HAL.
    12. Ohme, Rafal & Reykowska, Dorota & Wiener, Dawid & Choromanska, Anna, 2010. "Application of frontal EEG asymmetry to advertising research," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 785-793, October.
    13. Jacek P. Dmochowski & Matthew A. Bezdek & Brian P. Abelson & John S. Johnson & Eric H. Schumacher & Lucas C. Parra, 2014. "Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shane, Scott & Drover, Will & Clingingsmith, David & Cerf, Moran, 2020. "Founder passion, neural engagement and informal investor interest in startup pitches: An fMRI study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    2. Mateusz Piwowarski & Katarzyna Gadomska-Lila & Kesra Nermend, 2021. "Cognitive Neuroscience Methods in Enhancing Health Literacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Zhang, Jing & Lee, Eun-Ju, 2022. "“Two Rivers” brain map for social media marketing: Reward and information value drivers of SNS consumer engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 494-505.
    4. Paolo Antonetti & Benedetta Crisafulli & Aybars Tuncdogan, 2021. "“Just Look the Other Way”: Job Seekers’ Reactions to the Irresponsibility of Market-Dominant Employers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 403-422, November.
    5. Manit Mishra, 2016. "Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) as an Analytical Technique to Assess Measurement Error in Survey Research," Paradigm, , vol. 20(2), pages 97-112, December.
    6. Aroa Costa-Feito & Ana M. González-Fernández & Carmen Rodríguez-Santos & Miguel Cervantes-Blanco, 2023. "Electroencephalography in consumer behaviour and marketing: a science mapping approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Rumpf, Christopher & Boronczyk, Felix & Breuer, Christoph, 2020. "Predicting consumer gaze hits: A simulation model of visual attention to dynamic marketing stimuli," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 208-217.
    8. Meinel, Martin & Eismann, Tobias T. & Baccarella, Christian V. & Fixson, Sebastian K. & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2020. "Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 661-671.
    9. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    10. Ting Chi & Olabisi Adesanya & Hang Liu & Rebecca Anderson & Zihui Zhao, 2023. "Renting than Buying Apparel: U.S. Consumer Collaborative Consumption for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Youn Kue Na & Sungmin Kang, 2018. "Sustainable Diffusion of Fashion Information on Mobile Friends-Based Social Network Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Mohamed Elseknidy & Fakunle Samuel Kayode, 2023. "Radio frequency identification implementation model for sustainable development: A structural equation modeling approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1824-1844, June.
    13. Sweldens, Steven & Puntoni, Stefano & Paolacci, Gabriele & Vissers, Maarten, 2014. "The bias in the bias: Comparative optimism as a function of event social undesirability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 229-244.
    14. Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2011. "The nature and incidence of private label rejection," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 93-99.
    15. Ellen H.M. Moors & Rogier Donders, 2009. "Understanding consumer needs and preferences in new product development: the case of functional food innovations," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 09-03, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2009.
    16. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    17. Stalker, Katie Cotter & Wu, Qi & Evans, Caroline B.R. & Smokowski, Paul R., 2018. "The impact of the positive action program on substance use, aggression, and psychological functioning: Is school climate a mechanism of change?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 143-151.
    18. Jon M. Stein, 2023. "Utilizing Collective Intelligence to Combine Theory of Constraints with Lean Six Sigma," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(6), pages 1-34, February.
    19. Mr Clive Boddy & Mr Derek Bond & Dr Elaine Ramsey, 2010. "Projective Techniques Are they a Victim of Clashing Paradigms," Accounting, Finance and Economics Research Group Working Papers 1, Ulster Business School.
    20. Frode Alfnes & Chengyan Yue & Helen H. Jensen, 2010. "Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 37(2), pages 147-163, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:770-791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-research-in-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.