IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v131y2011i2p575-586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yan-Lai
  • Tang, Jia-Fu
  • Chin, Kwai-Sang
  • Jiang, Yu-Shi
  • Han, Yi
  • Pu, Yun

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) has been widely used to translate customer requirements (CRs) into engineering characteristics (ECs) in product improvement. Product planning house of quality (PPHOQ) is of fundamental and strategic importance in the QFD system. In the construction process of the PPHOQ of mature-period (MP) product, correctly estimating the final priority ratings of ECs is essential, because it will largely affect the target value of ECs for improvement. To exploit competitive information of MP products, this paper develops a comprehensive and systematic methodology to rate the final priority of ECs for MP product improvement. The proposed method is on the basis of maximal deviation based approach (MDBA) for dealing with the corporations' performance estimations of ECs, and it integrates AHP and scale method for analyzing the priority rating of achieving the improvement goal of performance evaluation (IGPE) of each EC. Finally, a case study is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:131:y:2011:i:2:p:575-586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(11)00041-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Shu-Ping & Yang, Chen-Lung & Chan, Ya-hui & Sheu, Chwen, 2010. "Refining Kano's 'quality attributes-satisfaction' model: A moderated regression approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 255-263, August.
    2. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Ko, Wen-Chang, 2010. "Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 619-632, March.
    3. Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2005. "A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 119-139, April.
    4. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Yunfeng, Jiang, 2009. "Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 711-723, June.
    5. Abbie Griffin & John R. Hauser, 1993. "The Voice of the Customer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27.
    6. Hajji, A. & Mhada, F. & Gharbi, A. & Pellerin, R. & Malhamé, R., 2011. "Integrated product specifications and productivity decision making in unreliable manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 32-42, January.
    7. Kahraman, Cengiz & Ertay, Tijen & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2006. "A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 390-411, June.
    8. Han, Chang Hee & Kim, Jae Kyeong & Choi, Sang Hyun, 2004. "Prioritizing engineering characteristics in quality function deployment with incomplete information: A linear partial ordering approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 235-249, October.
    9. Wong, Bo K. & Lai, Vincent S., 2011. "A survey of the application of fuzzy set theory in production and operations management: 1998-2009," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 157-168, January.
    10. Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2002. "Quality function deployment: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 463-497, December.
    11. Chien, Chen-Fu & Chen, Yun-Ju & Peng, Jin-Tang, 2010. "Manufacturing intelligence for semiconductor demand forecast based on technology diffusion and product life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 496-509, December.
    12. Partovi, Fariborz Y., 2006. "An analytic model for locating facilities strategically," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 41-55, January.
    13. Partovi, Fariborz Y. & Corredoira, Rafael A., 2002. "Quality function deployment for the good of soccer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(3), pages 642-656, March.
    14. Kim, Kwang-Jae & Moskowitz, Herbert & Dhingra, Anoop & Evans, Gerald, 2000. "Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 504-518, March.
    15. Carnevalli, José Antonio & Miguel, Paulo Augusto Cauchick & Calarge, Felipe Araújo, 2010. "Axiomatic design application for minimising the difficulties of QFD usage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Eilat, Harel & Golany, Boaz & Shtub, Avraham, 2008. "R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 895-912, October.
    17. Chen, Yizeng & Fung, Richard Y.K. & Tang, Jiafu, 2006. "Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1553-1566, November.
    18. Kay Chuan Tan & Vijayalakshmi Raghavan, 2004. "Incorporating Concepts Of Business Priority Into Quality Function Deployment," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(01), pages 21-35.
    19. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.
    20. Karipidis, Philippos I., 2011. "Market evaluations of dimensions of design quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 292-301, February.
    21. Iranmanesh, Hossein & Thomson, Vince, 2008. "Competitive advantage by adjusting design characteristics to satisfy cost targets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 64-71, September.
    22. Erol, Ismail & Ferrell, William Jr., 2003. "A methodology for selection problems with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 187-199, December.
    23. Govers, C. P. M., 1996. "What and how about quality function deployment (QFD)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 575-585, December.
    24. Govers, Cor P. M., 2001. "QFD not just a tool but a way of quality management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 151-159, January.
    25. Chin-Hung Liu & Hsin-Hung Wu, 2008. "A fuzzy group decision-making approach in quality function deployment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 527-540, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hamid Reza Fazeli & Qingjin Peng, 2023. "Integrated approaches of BWM-QFD and FUCOM-QFD for improving weighting solution of design matrix," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1003-1020, March.
    2. Pai Zheng & Xun Xu & Sheng Quan Xie, 2019. "A weighted interval rough number based method to determine relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD product planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 3-16, January.
    3. Wen-Chin Chen & Hui-Pin Chang & Kuan-Ming Lin & Neng-Hao Kan, 2015. "An Efficient Model for NPD Performance Evaluation Using DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP—Applied to the TFT-LCD Touch Panel Industry in Taiwan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carnevalli, Jose A. & Miguel, Paulo Cauchick, 2008. "Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD--Types of research, difficulties and benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 737-754, August.
    2. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju, 2015. "A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 815-829.
    3. Kamvysi, Konstantina & Gotzamani, Katerina & Andronikidis, Andreas & Georgiou, Andreas C., 2014. "Capturing and prioritizing students’ requirements for course design by embedding Fuzzy-AHP and linear programming in QFD," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1083-1094.
    4. Lin, Ling-Zhong & Yeh, Huery-Ren & Wang, Ming-Chao, 2015. "Integration of Kano’s model into FQFD for Taiwanese Ban-Doh banquet culture," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 245-262.
    5. Pai Zheng & Xun Xu & Sheng Quan Xie, 2019. "A weighted interval rough number based method to determine relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD product planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 3-16, January.
    6. Parra-López, Carlos & Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Carmona-Torres, Carmen & Rossing, Walter A.H., 2008. "Integrating public demands into model-based design for multifunctional agriculture: An application to intensive Dutch dairy landscapes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 538-551, November.
    7. Iranmanesh, Hossein & Thomson, Vince, 2008. "Competitive advantage by adjusting design characteristics to satisfy cost targets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 64-71, September.
    8. Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2002. "Quality function deployment: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 463-497, December.
    9. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Ko, Wen-Chang, 2010. "Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 619-632, March.
    10. Lubna Shoukat & Zafar Iqbal & Muhammad Waheed, 2019. "Listening to the Customers: How Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Addresses the Expectations of People in Various Fields Especially in Education," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(2), pages 467-477, June.
    11. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Ko, Wen-Chang & Yeh, Feng-Ting, 2017. "Approach based on fuzzy goal programing and quality function deployment for new product planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 654-663.
    12. Jia Huang & Ling-Xiang Mao & Hu-Chen Liu & Min-shun Song, 2022. "Quality function deployment improvement: A bibliometric analysis and literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1347-1366, June.
    13. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Yunfeng, Jiang, 2009. "Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 711-723, June.
    14. Ling-Zhong Lin & Liang-Chih Huang & Huery-Ren Yeh, 2012. "Fuzzy Group Decision-Making for Service Innovations in Quality Function Deployment," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 495-517, July.
    15. Chin-Hung Liu & Hsin-Hung Wu, 2008. "A fuzzy group decision-making approach in quality function deployment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 527-540, August.
    16. Meinel, Martin & Eismann, Tobias T. & Baccarella, Christian V. & Fixson, Sebastian K. & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2020. "Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 661-671.
    17. J-B Yang & D-L Xu & X Xie & A K Maddulapalli, 2011. "Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis—prioritizing voices of customer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1638-1654, September.
    18. Chen, Shuo-Pei & Wu, Wann-Yih, 2010. "A systematic procedure to evaluate an automobile manufacturer-distributor partnership," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 687-698, September.
    19. Govindan, Kannan & Shankar, Madan & Kannan, Devika, 2018. "Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 353-379.
    20. Kheybari, Siamak & Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi & Farazmand, Hadis, 2020. "Analytic network process: An overview of applications," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:131:y:2011:i:2:p:575-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.