IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v154y2026ics0140988326000150.html

The income threshold of household carbon emissions: Nonlinear growth and decoupling challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Yuedong
  • Liu, Wenling
  • Gao, Lei
  • Zhang, Fengtai
  • Zhu, Yulin
  • Wang, Xueyang

Abstract

Decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth is a key pathway to address climate change. However, most studies overlook the behavioral mechanisms behind the non-linear growth of household emissions and the challenges this non-linearity implies for decoupling. This study advances a consumption-transition model related to carbon emissions. The theoretical model suggests that once income exceeds a critical threshold, households shift from basic-needs spending to symbolic consumption and may imitate consumption patterns of higher-income households. This change can sharply increase demand for carbon-intensive goods and alter the decoupling status. Using China Family Panel Studies data for 2014–2022, we empirically identify an income threshold in household emissions, namely a carbon emission growth turning point (CEGTP), after which emissions rise more rapidly with income. Sensitivity analysis indicates that emission patterns remain stable within ±15% of the CEGTP, enabling robust comparison between high- and low-income households. We find that more than half of urban households have disposable income below the CEGTP, which may imply a significant risk of future emission increases. Consistent with the theoretical model, labor-dominated households exhibit a higher income elasticity of emissions than households dominated by older individuals or children, because working-age adults may be more prone and able to engage in symbolic consumption. The higher elasticity is primarily driven by discretionary spending, such as travel, rather than necessities like food, residential energy, or clothing. Thus, the key to achieving decoupling is to apply targeted policies to steer incremental consumption onto a low-carbon path.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Yuedong & Liu, Wenling & Gao, Lei & Zhang, Fengtai & Zhu, Yulin & Wang, Xueyang, 2026. "The income threshold of household carbon emissions: Nonlinear growth and decoupling challenges," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:154:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326000150
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988326000150
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Zhen-Hua & Zou, Le-Le & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2011. "The impact of household consumption on energy use and CO2 emissions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 656-670.
    2. Lucas Chancel, 2022. "Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 931-938, November.
    3. Fouquet, Roger, 2012. "Trends in income and price elasticities of transport demand (1850–2010)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 62-71.
    4. Lucas Chancel, 2022. "Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-04157767, HAL.
    5. Tapio, Petri, 2005. "Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 137-151, March.
    6. Stern, David I., 2004. "The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1419-1439, August.
    7. Jackson, Tim & Victor, Peter A., 2020. "The Transition to a Sustainable Prosperity-A Stock-Flow-Consistent Ecological Macroeconomic Model for Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Infante-Amate, Juan & Travieso, Emiliano & Aguilera, Eduardo, 2024. "Unsustainable prosperity? Decoupling wellbeing, economic growth, and greenhouse gas emissions over the past 150 years," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Zhao, Mengxue & Yuan, Zhihang & Chan, Hon S., 2023. "Housing wealth and household carbon emissions: The role of homeownership in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    10. Nailya Ordabayeva & Pierre Chandon, 2011. "Getting Ahead of the Joneses: When Equality Increases Conspicuous Consumption among Bottom-Tier Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(1), pages 27-41.
    11. Yannick Oswald & Anne Owen & Julia K. Steinberger, 2020. "Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 231-239, March.
    12. Jon M. Jachimowicz & Oliver P. Hauser & Julia D. O’Brien & Erin Sherman & Adam D. Galinsky, 2018. "The critical role of second-order normative beliefs in predicting energy conservation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(10), pages 757-764, October.
    13. Zhifu Mi & Jiali Zheng & Jing Meng & Jiamin Ou & Klaus Hubacek & Zhu Liu & D’Maris Coffman & Nicholas Stern & Sai Liang & Yi-Ming Wei, 2020. "Economic development and converging household carbon footprints in China," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 529-537, July.
    14. Pottier, Antonin, 2022. "Expenditure elasticity and income elasticity of GHG emissions: A survey of literature on household carbon footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Shaojian Wang & Jiabei Zhou & Kuishuang Feng & Klaus Hubacek, 2025. "Decoupling and Decomposition of Emissions and Economic Growth Based on Interprovincial Embodied Carbon Flow in China," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(6), pages 1326-1346, July.
    16. Lucas Chancel, 2022. "Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019," Post-Print halshs-04157767, HAL.
    17. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    18. Wei, Yi-Ming & Liu, Lan-Cui & Fan, Ying & Wu, Gang, 2007. "The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2 emission: An empirical analysis of China's residents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 247-257, January.
    19. Milton Friedman, 1957. "The Permanent Income Hypothesis," NBER Chapters, in: A Theory of the Consumption Function, pages 20-37, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory—Part A: Concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1392-1402.
    21. Lenzen, Manfred & Wier, Mette & Cohen, Claude & Hayami, Hitoshi & Pachauri, Shonali & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2006. "A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 181-207.
    22. Muhammad Shahbaz & Avik Sinha, 2019. "Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2emissions: a literature survey," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 106-168, January.
    23. de Freitas, Luciano Charlita & Kaneko, Shinji, 2011. "Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1459-1469, June.
    24. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Sinha, Avik, 2019. "Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: A survey of empirical literature," MPRA Paper 100257, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2019.
    25. Yannick Oswald & Anne Owen & Julia K. Steinberger, 2020. "Publisher Correction: Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 349-349, April.
    26. Dominik Wiedenhofer & Dabo Guan & Zhu Liu & Jing Meng & Ning Zhang & Yi-Ming Wei, 2017. "Unequal household carbon footprints in China," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 75-80, January.
    27. Vollebergh, Herman R.J. & Melenberg, Bertrand & Dijkgraaf, Elbert, 2009. "Identifying reduced-form relations with panel data: The case of pollution and income," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 27-42, July.
    28. Yang, Kaitong & Wu, Jun & Li, Ling & Mi, Zhifu & Yang, Junai & Tang, Ling, 2025. "Impact of household size and structure on carbon emissions in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 9-19.
    29. Eric Fosu Oteng-Abayie & Foster Awindolla Asaki & Maame Esi Eshun & Eric Abokyi, 2022. "Decomposition of the decoupling of CO2 emissions from economic growth in Ghana," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    30. Mette Wier & Manfred Lenzen & Jesper Munksgaard & Sinne Smed, 2001. "Effects of Household Consumption Patterns on CO2 Requirements," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 259-274.
    31. Easterlin, Richard A., 1974. "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence," MPRA Paper 111773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    32. Wen, Fenghua & Ye, Zhengke & Yang, Huaidong & Li, Ke, 2018. "Exploring the rebound effect from the perspective of household: An analysis of China's provincial level," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 345-356.
    33. Dorn, Franziska & Maxand, Simone & Kneib, Thomas, 2024. "The nonlinear dependence of income inequality and carbon emissions: Potentials for a sustainable future," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    34. Unruh, Gregory C., 2000. "Understanding carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 817-830, October.
    35. Ed Hopkins & Tatiana Kornienko, 2004. "Running to Keep in the Same Place: Consumer Choice as a Game of Status," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 1085-1107, September.
    36. Hou, Aoyu & Liu, Ao & Chai, Li, 2024. "Does reducing income inequality promote the decoupling of economic growth from carbon footprint?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    37. Li, Chuan-Zhong & Wei, Chu & Yu, Yang, 2020. "Income threshold, household appliance ownership and residential energy consumption in urban China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    38. Meng, Weilu & Yuan, Gecheng & Sun, Yongping, 2023. "Expansion of social networks and household carbon emissions: Evidence from household survey in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    39. Witt, Ulrich, 2010. "Symbolic consumption and the social construction of product characteristics," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 17-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cappelli, Federica, 2025. "Unequal contributions to CO2 emissions along the income distribution within and between countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Gao, Xue & Chen, Xuan & Liu, Lan-Cui, 2024. "Exploring the determinants of the evolution of urban and rural household carbon footprints inequality in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Zhong, Honglin & Zhang, Xinyu & Shao, Xuan & Xiao, Jingyi & Tian, Peipei, 2024. "Dissecting household carbon and energy inequality: A decade's insight into regional disparities and urban-rural dynamics in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Federica Cappelli, 2024. "Unequal contributions to CO2 emissions along the income distribution within and between countries," Working Papers 2024.06, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Zuo, Qiting & Zhang, Zhizhuo & Wu, Qingsong & Ji, Yihu & Ma, Junxia, 2025. "Revealing environmental inequality based on three-dimensional extended input-output analysis: An integrated perspective of embodied water consumption, fossil energy use and carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
    6. Ravaioli, Giacomo & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea & Domingos, Tiago, 2025. "Tackling emissions and inequality: policy insights from an agent-based model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    7. Apeti, Ablam Estel & Bambe, Bao We Wal & Edoh, Eyah Denise & Ly, Alpha, 2025. "Wealth inequality and carbon inequality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Cappelli, Federica, 2024. "Unequal contributions to CO2 emissions along the income distribution within and between countries," FEEM Working Papers 341641, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    9. Flechtner, Svenja & Middelanis, Martin, 2025. "Income inequality and the trade-off between socio-economic and ecological goals," VfS Annual Conference 2025 (Cologne): Revival of Industrial Policy 325403, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Marie Sciaccitano & Lionel Nesta, 2026. "Green Consumption and Income Elasticities: Cross-country Evidence on Environmental Engel Curves," GREDEG Working Papers 2026-15, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    11. Puja Bhattacharjee & Mohammad Tarequl Hasan Chowdhury, 2025. "Greenhouse gas emissions: is there an environmental Kuznets curve in South Asia?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 19405-19433, August.
    12. Lindequist, David & Selent, Samuel, 2025. "Did shale gas green the U.S. economy?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Duro, Juan Antonio & Ramirez, Noemí & Wieland, Hanspeter & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Haberl, Helmut, 2025. "Global inequalities in countries' demand for raw materials: Twenty years of expansion and insufficient convergence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    14. Dong, Kangyin & Zhao, Congyu & Nepal, Rabindra & Zander, Kerstin K., 2025. "Are natural disasters stumbling blocks to carbon inequality mitigation? A global perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Pottier, Antonin, 2022. "Expenditure elasticity and income elasticity of GHG emissions: A survey of literature on household carbon footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Ly, Alpha, 2025. "Scaling up renewables without phasing down fossil fuels? Rethinking the role of financial globalization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    17. Bernard Cléry Nomo Beyala & Célestin Ghislain Balla Mekongo & Simplice A. Asongu, 2026. "Does economic complexity mitigate carbon inequality?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 70(5), pages 1-59, May.
    18. Malerba, Daniele & Roscioli, Federico & Gaentzsch, Anja & Ward, Hauke, 2024. "Changing carbon footprints and the consequent impacts of carbon taxes and cash transfers on poverty and inequality across years: A Peruvian case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Missbach, Leonard & Steckel, Jan Christoph, 2024. "Distributional impacts of climate policy and effective compensation: Evidence from 88 countries," EconStor Preprints 296491, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    20. Zhao, Congyu & Jia, Rongwen & Dong, Kangyin, 2023. "Does financial inclusion achieve the dual dividends of narrowing carbon inequality within cities and between cities? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q3 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy
    • R2 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:154:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326000150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.