Author
Listed:
- Zheng, Qingying
- Li, Handan
- Bu, Guochao
- Liu, Hongxun
Abstract
This paper first distinguishes green innovation into substantive innovation (GI) and strategic innovation (SI). It then employs evolutionary game and panel econometric models to examine firms' green innovation choices under varying intensities of carbon emission regulation, as well as the moderating role of green finance support. The results show that carbon regulation mitigates the insufficient incentive problem for green innovation. However, different levels of regulatory intensity induce firms to adopt distinct green innovation strategies. Using the comprehensive carbon price (TCP) as a proxy for regulation intensity, we identify an inverted U-shaped relationship between TCP and GI. When the TCP is below the critical value of 19.08 yuan/ton, an increase in carbon price effectively promotes GI, whereas beyond this threshold, further increases significantly inhibit GI. In contrast, TCP exhibits a significant positive linear relationship with SI, indicating that for each one-yuan increase in carbon price raises strategic green innovations by approximately 0.76 %. Green finance support alleviates the cost and risk pressures imposed by carbon emission regulation, raising the threshold to 20.56 yuan/ton and playing a significant moderating role. Moreover, heterogeneity analysis reveals that the inverted U-shaped relationship between TCP and GI varies across firms: the threshold shifts rightward for large-scale firms and those facing intense industry competition, but leftward for heavily polluting firms. These findings provide policy implications for optimizing carbon regulation and green finance mechanisms, and for addressing firms' overemphasis on the quantity rather than quality of green innovation.
Suggested Citation
Zheng, Qingying & Li, Handan & Bu, Guochao & Liu, Hongxun, 2026.
"Navigating green innovation: The role of carbon regulation and green finance in corporate strategy,"
Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:153:y:2026:i:c:s0140988325009193
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109089
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:153:y:2026:i:c:s0140988325009193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.