IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v248y2026ics092180092600131x.html

Shades of outrage? Socio-economic causes of environmental degradation and stated WTP

Author

Listed:
  • Garcia, Jorge H.
  • Carriazo, Fernando
  • Carlsson, Fredrik

Abstract

This study explicitly acknowledges that environmental damage typically occurs within a social context. We conducted a willingness-to-pay (WTP) survey of 844 individuals to measure the welfare losses induced by an environmental externality: we used two treatments in which the socioeconomic background of those who caused the externality varied. The treatments varied in the degree of control (or agency) that the generators of the externality had over their actions. The study finds no statistical difference in mean WTP across treatments, indicating no evidence of Kahneman's “outrage effect,” whereby individuals are particularly upset by what they regard as intentional harms.

Suggested Citation

  • Garcia, Jorge H. & Carriazo, Fernando & Carlsson, Fredrik, 2026. "Shades of outrage? Socio-economic causes of environmental degradation and stated WTP," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:248:y:2026:i:c:s092180092600131x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180092600131X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:248:y:2026:i:c:s092180092600131x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.