IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v235y2025ics0921800925001168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrete choice experiment estimates on the value of soil health attributes in Central Texas

Author

Listed:
  • Black, Michael A.
  • Ahmadiani, Mona
  • Bagnall, Dianna K.
  • Morgan, Cristine L.S.
  • Ogieriakhi, Macson
  • Woodward, Richard T.

Abstract

When farmers adopt conservation tillage, they are making a management change that is expected to improve manageable characteristics of soil health. The current literature on the value of soil health, however, primarily focuses on the value of inherent soil characteristics. In this paper we close the gap in the literature by estimating the value of improvements in soil health. Using a sample of farmers in Texas' Brazos River Watershed and a stated-preference discrete-choice experiment, we elicit preferences for improvements in water infiltration, surface compaction, and organic matter content, characteristics that can be realistically improved by adopting a conservation tillage. For soil improvements roughly equivalent to what could be achieved by adopting no-till, we find that, on average, farmers are willing to pay $50–100 per acre per year to improve water infiltration, $20–50 to reduce surface compaction, and $2–11 per acre to improve organic matter content. We examine preference heterogeneity using sub-samples of the population, latent class specifications, and mixed-logit models, and find substantial variation in willingness to pay across farmers. Our findings offer insights into the value farmers place on soil health, but also that there is a great deal of variation in those values, which may help explain why soil conservations practices are not widely used in our study region.

Suggested Citation

  • Black, Michael A. & Ahmadiani, Mona & Bagnall, Dianna K. & Morgan, Cristine L.S. & Ogieriakhi, Macson & Woodward, Richard T., 2025. "Discrete choice experiment estimates on the value of soil health attributes in Central Texas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:235:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925001168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001168
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:235:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925001168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.