IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp1114-1132.html

Performance-based research funding allocation for excellence: Evidence from central and western Chinese higher education institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Yuzhen
  • See, Kok Fong
  • Hsiao, Bo

Abstract

Research funds from the government play an essential role in the scientific research of public higher educational institutions (HEIs). To promote the development of central and western HEIs, the government, as a central decision maker, has increased the financial budget for research through educational policy. To achieve better improvement under this funding limitation, it is necessary to develop a reasonable resource allocation plan. Thus, a novel two-stage network DEA method with shared input is proposed to address this issue. Considering the roles of other HEIs in the allocation process, this study further combines the concept of cross-efficiency to obtain an optimal allocation plan. Finally, the proposed method is applied to reallocate government funds among the evaluated central and western HEIs (“Revitalization plan” HEIs), share them in each stage without decreasing efficiency, and set the output target simultaneously. The results show that the output will achieve a significant increase in the whole evaluated HEI after the reallocation of government funds. Moreover, the in-depth analysis provides a direction for future fund allocation for the government.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Yuzhen & See, Kok Fong & Hsiao, Bo, 2026. "Performance-based research funding allocation for excellence: Evidence from central and western Chinese higher education institutions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1114-1132.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:1114-1132
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.07.046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003200
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.07.046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:1114-1132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.