IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v81y2024icp45-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does environmental management system reform improve air quality? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Chi, Guodong
  • Liu, Yuanyuan
  • Fang, Hong

Abstract

Environmental decentralization faces significant institutional barriers, contributing to failures in environmental governance observed in many countries. While prior research highlighted the benefits of external vertical supervision, there is limited research seeking fundamental solutions from the perspective of institutional reform. Using panel data of Chinese prefecture-level cities over the period 2014–2019, we examine the impact of Vertical Reform of Environmental Protection (VREP) on air pollution by exploiting staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model. The findings suggest a positive effect of VREP on air quality, with a more pronounced effect in regions experiencing heightened environmental governance challenges. Interestingly, pressures from economic development appear to have no adverse effect on this relationship. The observed improvements in air quality seem to stem from stricter environmental regulation rather than increased environmental investment. Additional findings indicate a reduction in data falsification within environmental monitoring post-reform. Overall, the evidence underscores the significance of VREP in enhancing air pollution control.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi, Guodong & Liu, Yuanyuan & Fang, Hong, 2024. "Does environmental management system reform improve air quality? Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 45-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:45-62
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592623003053
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:45-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.