IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v92y2025ics1043951x25000975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peace or menace? Robots and social conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Mingyue
  • Sun, Tianshi
  • Liu, Xiuyan

Abstract

In recent decades, China has experienced technological changes, primarily in the form of industrial robots. There is growing fear that the use of robots will threaten human society. Do robots threaten peace and stability in human society? To answer this question, this study explored the direct link between robot exposure and social stability. We exploited China's unique social conflict data to discuss the impact of its robot exposure rate on social conflict. We also provided micro-level intermediate mechanisms using individual micro-survey data. We found that robot use significantly reduces the likelihood of social conflict. Further, the social conflict reduction effect of robots occurs mainly through the reduction of work stress and improvement of workers' work sentiments. Simultaneously, we found that, in general, the use of robots did not cause mass unemployment.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Mingyue & Sun, Tianshi & Liu, Xiuyan, 2025. "Peace or menace? Robots and social conflict," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000975
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000975
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.