IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cha/ysa001/v2y2009i1p81-112.html

Economic Consequences of GMO Traceability in the EU Food and Feed Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Zapilko

    (University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan, Professorship for Marketing and Management of Biogenic Resources, Straubing)

  • Sandra Feigl

    (University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan, Professorship for Marketing and Management of Biogenic Resources, Straubing)

  • Klaus Menrad

    (University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan, Professorship for Marketing and Management of Biogenic Resources, Straubing)

  • Tobias Hirzinger

    (Munich Re Group, München)

Abstract

The application of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and food production has steadily increased in the recent years, while EU consumers` acceptance of using GMOs in the food area is still very low. In order to ensure consumers` and users` freedom of choice, the EU adopted specific regulations whereby food and feed products have to be labelled if containing more than 0,9 % of GMOs. This led to an increasing need of GMO testing for the EU food and feed industry. This study aims to analyse the economic consequences of GMO traceability within this industry. Furthermore, it also investigated if the need for GMO testing created new economic and business opportunities for producers of analytical test kits as well as for diagnostic laboratories usually carrying out these tests. In summary it can be stated that the economic impact in terms of turnover, additional costs and employment is rather small for all three business sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Zapilko & Sandra Feigl & Klaus Menrad & Tobias Hirzinger, 2009. "Economic Consequences of GMO Traceability in the EU Food and Feed Industry," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 2(1), pages 81-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:cha:ysa001:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:81-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://archive.jsagr.org/v2/04_Zapilko.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. House, Lisa & Lusk, Jayson L. & Jaeger, Sara & Traill, W. Bruce & Moore, Melissa & Valli, Carlotta & Morrow, Bert & Yee, Wallace M.S., 2004. "Objective And Subjective Knowledge: Impacts On Consumer Demand For Genetically Modified Foods In The United States And The European Union," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20125, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Hirzinger, Tobias & Menrad, Klaus, 2005. "EFFECTS OF THE REGULATION (EC) No 1829/2003 and 1830/2003 ON THE FOOD INDUSTRY IN GERMANY," Conference Papers 91120, University of Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Straubing Centre of Science.
    3. W. Bruce Traill, 2004. "Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 31(2), pages 179-204, June.
    4. Costa-Font, Montserrat & Gil, José M. & Traill, W. Bruce, 2008. "Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 99-111, April.
    5. Boccaletti, Stefano & Nardella, Michele, 2000. "Consumer Willingness To Pay For Pesticide-Free Fresh Fruit And Vegetables In Italy," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 3(3), pages 1-14.
    6. Lusk, Jayson L., 2004. "United States and European Consumer Demand for Genetically Modified Food in an Experimental Market," Purdue Agricultural Economics Report 188880, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Asselt, Joanna & Nian, Yefan & Soh, Moonwon & Gao, Zhifeng & Morgan, Stephen N, 2020. "Do Plastic Warning Labels Reduce Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Plastic Packaging?," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304503, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Yang Yang & Jill E. Hobbs, 2020. "How Do Cultural Worldviews Shape Food Technology Perceptions? Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 465-492, June.
    3. Rodríguez-Entrena, Macario & Salazar-Ordóñez, Melania & Sayadi, Samir, 2013. "Applying partial least squares to model genetically modified food purchase intentions in southern Spain consumers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 44-53.
    4. Omid M. Ghoochani & Mansour Ghanian & Masoud Baradaran & Erfan Alimirzaei & Hossein Azadi, 2018. "Behavioral intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-stakeholder analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 233-253, February.
    5. Xie, Jing & Hyeyoung, Kim & House, Lisa, 2014. "Valuing Information on GM Foods in the presence of Country-of-Origin Labels," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(3), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Jin, Hyun Joung & Han, Dae Hee, 2014. "Interaction between message framing and consumers’ prior subjective knowledge regarding food safety issues," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 95-102.
    7. Salazar-Ordóñez, M. & Rodríguez-Entrena, M. & Becerra-Alonso, D., 2014. "Willingness to purchase Genetically Modified food: an analysis applying artificial Neural Networks," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182940, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Costa-Font, Montserrat & Gil, José M. & Traill, W. Bruce, 2008. "Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 99-111, April.
    9. Hu, Yang & House, Lisa A. & Gao, Zhifeng, 2022. "How do consumers respond to labels for crispr (gene-editing)?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Wilson, Lacey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2020. "Consumer willingness to pay for redundant food labels," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Linda Ferrari, 2022. "Farmers' attitude toward CRISPR/Cas9: The case of blast resistant rice," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(1), pages 175-194, January.
    12. Magdi Du Preez & Daleen Van der Merwe & Louise Wyma & Susanna Maria Ellis, 2021. "Assessing Knowledge and Use Practices of Plastic Food Packaging among Young Adults in South Africa: Concerns about Chemicals and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Min-Seong Kim & Jinwon Kim & Brijesh Thapa, 2018. "Influence of Environmental Knowledge on Affect, Nature Affiliation and Pro-Environmental Behaviors among Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Joseph Seong & Simone Valle de Souza & H. Christopher Peterson, 2023. "Seeds of Industry Sustainability: Consumer Attitudes towards Indoor Agriculture Benefits versus Its Advanced Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Henseleit, Meike & Kubitzki, Sabine, 2009. "‘GMO-Free’ Labels – Enhancing Transparency or Deceiving Consumers?," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51029, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Alexandre Magnier & Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes & Jayson Lusk, 2022. "Changes in Consumer Preferences toward Non‐GM Foods within an Information‐Rich Environment: The Case of the Washington State Ballot Initiative," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 489-510, March.
    17. Marcello TEDESCHI & Maria Cristiana MARTINI & Giovanna GALLI, 2018. "Collective Brands and Intention to Buy: A Preliminary Study on Wine Consumption," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 176-184, November.
    18. Martinez-Poveda, Africa & Molla-Bauza, Margarita Brugarolas & Martinez, Laura Martinez-Carrasco & Gomis, Francisco Jose Del Campo, 2005. "Effect of the Information on the Intention of GM Food Consumption," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24616, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Ufer, Danielle & Ortega, David L. & Wolf, Christopher A. & Swanson, Janice & McKendree, Melissa, 2022. "Market Acceptance of Animal Welfare-Improving Biotechnology: Gene-Editing and Immunocastration in U.S. Pork," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(2), May.
    20. Ellison, Brenna & Bernard, John C. & Paukett, Michelle & Toensmeyer, Ulrich C., 2016. "The influence of retail outlet and FSMA information on consumer perceptions of and willingness to pay for organic grape tomatoes," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 109-119.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cha:ysa001:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:81-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Briner (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jsagr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.