IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pewipo/v16y2015i3p264-288n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die „Rente mit 63“: Wer sind die Begünstigten?: Was sind die Auswirkungen auf die Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung?

Author

Listed:
  • Börsch-Supan Axel

    (Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging; Amalienstraße 33, D – 80799 Munich, Germany)

  • Coppola Michela

    (Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging; Amalienstraße 33, D – 80799 Munich, Germany)

  • Rausch Johannes

    (Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging; Amalienstraße 33, D – 80799 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Surprisingly, Germany reduced with the so called „Rente mit 63“ („retirement at 63“) the earliest retirement age without adjustments for insured with an exceptionally long contribution history from 65 to 63. In this study, we identify the group of people benefiting from the „Rente mit 63“ using administrative data of the German statutory pension system and analyze the effects of the reform on the financial situation of the German pension system.Assuming that all eligible persons make full use of the new benefits we find that the beneficiaries of the reform have higher pension claims on average. They have spent significantly less than 45 years in contributory employment: men 38 years, women 35 years. The data show no evidence that the beneficiaries are more often ill than non-beneficiaries. In fact, the opposite is the case.The „Rente mit 63“ will lead to a higher contribution rate and a lower pension level. Since the effects on the contribution rate will be reduced by the adjustment rules of the general federal subsidy, all taxpayers will contribute to funding the reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Börsch-Supan Axel & Coppola Michela & Rausch Johannes, 2015. "Die „Rente mit 63“: Wer sind die Begünstigten?: Was sind die Auswirkungen auf die Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 264-288, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pewipo:v:16:y:2015:i:3:p:264-288:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/pwp-2015-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2015-0020
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/pwp-2015-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Gruber & David A. Wise, 1999. "Introduction to "Social Security and Retirement around the World"," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security and Retirement around the World, pages 1-35, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Axel Borsch-Supan & Reinhold Schnabel, 1999. "Social Security and Retirement in Germany," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security and Retirement around the World, pages 135-180, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Alan Barrett & Irene Mosca, 2013. "Increasing the State Pension Age, the Recession and Expected Retirement Ages," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 44(4), pages 447-472.
    4. Katharina Kröger & Uwe Fachinger & Ralf K. Himmelreicher, 2011. "Empirische Forschungsvorhaben zur Alterssicherung Einige kritische Anmerkungen zur aktuellen Datenlage," RatSWD Working Papers 170, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    5. Scott Lynch, 2003. "Cohort and life-course patterns in the relationship between education and health: A hierarchical approach," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 40(2), pages 309-331, May.
    6. Jonathan Gruber & David A. Wise, 1999. "Social Security and Retirement around the World," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number grub99-1, October.
    7. Kluth, Sebastian & Gasche, Martin, 2013. "Ersatzraten in der Gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung," MEA discussion paper series 201311, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    8. Stefan Bach & Peter Haan & Michela Coppola & Johannes Rausch, 2014. "Wirkungen von Rentenreformen auf Rentenbeitrag und Rentenniveau sowie Beschäftigungseffekte der Rentenbeitragsänderung: Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag der Initiative Soziale Marktwirtschaft GmbH - INSM," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 79, number pbk79.
    9. Clemens, Johannes, 2006. "Anmerkungen zur geplanten Anhebung des gesetzlichen Rentenalters," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 86(3), pages 163-167.
    10. repec:mea:meawpa:13276 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Michela Coppola & Christina Benita Wilke, 2014. "At What Age Do You Expect to Retire? Retirement Expectations and Increases in the Statutory Retirement Age," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 35, pages 165-188, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Werding, 2016. "One Pillar Crumbling, the Others Too Short: Old-Age Provision in Germany," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 237(1), pages 13-21, August.
    2. Florian Dorn & Benedikt Kauf & Manuela Krause & Niklas Potrafke, 2016. "Altersvorsorge und Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung – nachhaltig aufgestellt?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(17), pages 44-48, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Börsch-Supan, Axel & Coppola, Michela & Rausch, Johannes, 2014. "Die Rente mit 63: Wer sind die Begünstigten? Was sind die Auswirkungen auf die Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung?," MEA discussion paper series 201417, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    2. repec:iab:iabfme:201801(en is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Michele Belloni & Rob Alessie, 2008. "The Importance of Financial Incentives on Retirement Choices," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-052/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Blundell, R. & French, E. & Tetlow, G., 2016. "Retirement Incentives and Labor Supply," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 457-566, Elsevier.
    5. Pfister, Mona & Lorenz, Svenja & Zwick, Thomas, 2018. "Calculation of pension entitlements in the sample of integrated labour market biographies (SIAB)," FDZ Methodenreport 201801_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    6. Bernardo Lanza Queiroz, 2007. "The determinants of male retirement in urban Brazil," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 17(1), pages 11-36, January-A.
    7. Gruber, Jonathan & Kanninen, Ohto & Ravaska, Terhi, 2022. "Relabeling, retirement and regret," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Lalive, Rafael & Parrotta, Pierpaolo, 2017. "How does pension eligibility affect labor supply in couples?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 177-188.
    9. Gilles Le Garrec & Stéphane Lhuissier, 2011. "Life expectancy, heavy work and the return to education: lessons for the social security reform," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01069511, HAL.
    10. Assar Lindbeck & Mats Persson, 2003. "The Gains from Pension Reform," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 41(1), pages 74-112, March.
    11. Ga?ecka-Burdziak, Ewa & Góra, Marek, 2017. "How Do Unemployed Workers Behave Prior to Retirement? A Multi-State Multiple-Spell Approach," IZA Discussion Papers 10680, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Mona Larsen & Peder J. Pedersen, 2017. "Labour force activity after 65: what explain recent trends in Denmark, Germany and Sweden? [Arbeitsmarktbeteiligung von über 65-Jährigen: Ursachen für die jüngsten Entwicklungstrends in Dänemark, D," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 50(1), pages 15-27, August.
    13. Helmuth Cremer & Jean‐Marie Lozachmeur & Pierre Pestieau, 2008. "Social Security And Retirement Decision: A Positive And Normative Approach," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 213-233, April.
    14. Hugo Benítez-Silva & José Ignacio García-Pérez & Sergi Jiménez-Martín, 2014. "Reforming the U.S. Social Security system accounting for employment uncertainty," Economics Working Papers 1455, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    15. Cristiano Antonelli, 2017. "The Engines of the Creative Response: Reactivity and Knowledge Governance," Economía: teoría y práctica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México, vol. 47(2), pages 9-30, Julio-Dic.
    16. Axel Börsch-Supan & Tabea Bucher-Koenen & Felizia Hanemann, 2018. "Early Determinants of Work Disability in an International Perspective," NBER Working Papers 25142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Niels Vermeer & Maarten Rooij & Daniel Vuuren, 2019. "Retirement Age Preferences: The Role of Social Interactions and Anchoring at the Statutory Retirement Age," De Economist, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 307-345, December.
    18. Laméris, Maite D. & Garretsen, Harry & Jong-A-Pin, Richard, 2020. "Political ideology and the intragenerational prospect of upward mobility," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Iñigo Iturbe-Ormaetxe & Guadalupe Valera, 2012. "Social security reform and the support for public education," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 25(2), pages 609-634, January.
    20. Cremer Helmuth & Lozachmeur Jean-Marie & Pestieau Pierre, 2007. "Disability Testing and Retirement," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-34, February.
    21. Pilar García-Gómez & Sergi Jiménez-Martín & Judit Vall Castelló, 2018. "Trends in Labor Force Participation of Older Workers in Spain," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: Working Longer, pages 205-230, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    staatliche Alterssicherung; Rentenreform;

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pewipo:v:16:y:2015:i:3:p:264-288:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.