IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v38y2024i1p57-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do we know about no‐show behavior? A systematic, interdisciplinary literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Amberger
  • Dominik Schreyer

Abstract

No‐show behavior, a distinct form of absenteeism, is often problematic, particularly in the service industry. Given the growing relevance of the phenomenon in the industry, an increasing number of researchers from such different disciplines as educational economics, healthcare management research, and sports economics have begun examining both the potential antecedents and measures to counteract no‐show behavior, recently. Although the continuously growing body of literature on no‐show behavior has been reviewed before, most such previous attempts were neither interdisciplinary nor systematic, sometimes lacking both completeness and thoroughness. In this article, we address this gap in the still‐emerging literature by providing a systematic, interdisciplinary review of the literature. We observe that, although the potential antecedents are manifold and not always neatly comparable across the different industries, there still exist commonalities, most of which are related to product characteristics and the opportunity costs arising from physical attendance. In contrast, although we document a promising effect of exploiting reminders in reducing no‐show behavior, our understanding of the effectiveness of potential countermeasures is less pronounced.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Amberger & Dominik Schreyer, 2024. "What do we know about no‐show behavior? A systematic, interdisciplinary literature review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 57-96, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:57-96
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.12534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12534
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.12534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:57-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.