IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inijae/206346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food Safety Regulatory Compliance in India: A Challenge to Enhance Agri-businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Jairath, M.S.
  • Purohit, Purnima

Abstract

The present paper is an attempt to understand the level of food safety regulations in food businesses and its compliance in India to assess the prospects of food businesses under the surveillance of India’s new Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The study finds that in the second quarter of 2006, the country had witnessed a new initiative of enactment of the latest Act, ‘the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (No. 34 of 2006), under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare that integrates the existing eight of the food laws. It brings about one statute under a single apex regulatory authority known as Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). The study also highlights that food safety law is poorly implemented in the country specially in case of marketing of fruits and vegetables. The availability of modern infrastructure like scientific ripening chambers for fruits and vegetables has not been provided by the local Government even in modern markets. The lack of scientific ripening chambers to meet international safety standards in the modern market clearly indicates that even in the modern markets of India food safety issues appears to be neglected. It is suggested that there is a strong need to have (i) Special budget for building soft and hard infrastructure; (ii) Attract more Private-Public-People partnership to undertake awareness programmes, sensitisation and capacity building on risk communication in both perishables and non-perishables food items; (iii) Set up accredited network of laboratories with skilled manpower to conduct scientific testing for the primary perishable agricultural commodities; (iv) APMCs to ensure a premium payment for better quality graded produce to the farmers as an incentive to follow and innovate more of the food safety norms, while providing modern infrastructural facilities to both traders and farmers; and (v) Explore innovative models of management, for instance, the state government may consider pilot project to lease out the regulated market to private agri-businesses. The regulatory authorities in turn assume an advisory and regulatory role to make sure that safety norms in that market are as per the law and provide supporting infrastructure. Build Consumers’ Trust by (vi) Gradually introducing city-based scheme to restrict sale of lose food items; (vii) Sensitize public about food-safety risks and possible way out for prevention by involvement of consumer organisations; (viii) Mandatory record keeping by implementation authorities for monitoring, effectiveness of law enforcement and food surveillance activities; and (ix) Encourage prescriptive based sale of controlled chemicals at registered places; (x) Set-up an exclusive committee to frame a set of good and hygienic practices for all activities undertaken in market of fruits and vegetables; (xi) Train and educate farmers on personal hygiene along with safe application of pesticides and efficient spray technology as an attempt to prevent contamination in fields; (xii) Integrate small farm owners and traders in India into food safety and quality networks by establishing more number of supermarkets that may help both managing traceability issue; and (xiii) Generating awareness through learning-by-doing process. The suggestions offered above, if implemented, would lead to fostering agri-business both in the domestic and international markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jairath, M.S. & Purohit, Purnima, 2013. "Food Safety Regulatory Compliance in India: A Challenge to Enhance Agri-businesses," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(3), pages 1-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:206346
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.206346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/206346/files/Jairath_Purohit68_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.206346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prema‐Chandra Athukorala & Sisira Jayasuriya, 2003. "Food Safety Issues, Trade and WTO Rules: A Developing Country Perspective," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(9), pages 1395-1416, September.
    2. AfDB AfDB, . "AfDB Group Annual Report 2009 (Portuguese)," Annual Report, African Development Bank, number 67 edited by Koua Louis Kouakou.
    3. Dominic Mancini & Gregmar I. Galinato, 2008. "Was It Something I Ate? Implementation of the FDA Seafood HACCP Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(1), pages 28-41.
    4. AfDB AfDB, 2010. "MDG Report 2010 - Full Report," MDG Report 100, African Development Bank.
    5. AfDB AfDB, . "AfDB Group Annual Report 2009 (Arabic)," Annual Report, African Development Bank, number 68 edited by Koua Louis Kouakou.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pellegrini, Laura A. & Soave, Giorgio & Gamba, Simone & Langè, Stefano, 2011. "Economic analysis of a combined energy–methanol production plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4891-4897.
    2. Dehghani, Hamed & Vahidi, Behrooz & Hosseinian, Seyed Hossein, 2017. "Wind farms participation in electricity markets considering uncertainties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 907-918.
    3. Meslier, Céline & Tacneng, Ruth & Tarazi, Amine, 2014. "Is bank income diversification beneficial? Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 97-126.
    4. Garcia, Humberto E. & Mohanty, Amit & Lin, Wen-Chiao & Cherry, Robert S., 2013. "Dynamic analysis of hybrid energy systems under flexible operation and variable renewable generation – Part II: Dynamic cost analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 17-26.
    5. Flaig, Dorothee & Siddig, Khalid & Grethe, Harald & Luckmann, Jonas & McDonald, Scott, 2013. "Relaxing Israeli restrictions on Palestinian labour: Who benefits?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 143-150.
    6. Monios, Jason, 2011. "The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-66.
    7. Lofgren, Hans & Cicowiez, Martin & Diaz-Bonilla, Carolina, 2013. "MAMS – A Computable General Equilibrium Model for Developing Country Strategy Analysis," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 159-276, Elsevier.
    8. Soto, Victoria Eugenia & Farfan, Maria Isabel & Lorant, Vincent, 2012. "Fiscal decentralisation and infant mortality rate: The Colombian case," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(9), pages 1426-1434.
    9. Kohpaiboon, Archanun, 2006. "MNEs and the Global Integration of Thailand’s Processed Food Exports: A Firm-Level Study," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 3(1-2), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Alessandro Gambini & Alberto Zazzaro, 2013. "Long-lasting bank relationships and growth of firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 977-1007, May.
    11. Alessandro Nicita & Julia Seiermann, 2016. "G20 Policies And Export Performance Of Least Developed Countries," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 75, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    12. Athukorala, Prema-chandra & Narayanan, Suresh, 2018. "Economic corridors and regional development: The Malaysian experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Houssa, Romain & Verpoorten, Marijke, 2015. "The Unintended Consequence of an Export Ban: Evidence from Benin’s Shrimp Sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 138-150.
    14. Alessandro Nicita & Marina Murina, 2014. "Trading With Conditions: The Effect Of Sanitary And Phytosanitary Measures On Lower Income Countries’ Agricultural Exports," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 68, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    15. Seungyeon Moon & Heesang Lee, 2020. "The Role of Standards-Related Capacity Building on the Sustainable Development of Developing Countries: Focusing on the Korea’s Standards-Related AfT Case in Bolivia," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Prema-chandra Athukorala, 2004. "Agricultural Trade Reforms in the Doha Round: A Developing Country Perspective," Departmental Working Papers 2004-05, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    17. Minten, Bart & Reardon, Thomas & Vandeplas, Anneleen, 2009. "Linking urban consumers and rural farmers in India: A comparison of traditional and modern food supply chains," IFPRI discussion papers 883, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Antonio M. Conti & Andrea Nobili & Federico M. Signoretti, 2018. "Bank capital constraints, lending supply and economic activity," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1199, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. O'Connell, John F. & Warnock-Smith, David, 2013. "An investigation into traveler preferences and acceptance levels of airline ancillary revenues," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-21.
    20. Santeramo, Fabio G., 2017. "On Non-Tariff Measures and Changes in Trade Routes: From North-North to South-South Trade?," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 263493, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:206346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.