IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Estimating the economic impact of the Sydney Olympic Games

Listed author(s):
  • John Madden


  • Matthew Crowe


This paper employs a multiregional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to examine the effects on the New South Wales and Australian economies of the 2000 Olympics. The Olympics are modelled over a 12-year period from 1994 to 2005, divided into three phases: (i) the Pre-Event phase, 1994 to 1999; (ii) the Event Year, 2000; and (iii) the Post-Event phase, 2001-2005. Construction of the Olympics venues and associated infrastructure is modelled as occurring in the first phase, while the operation of the Games (including ticketing) and Games tourism (i.e. visits by spectators, Games participants, etc.) is assumed to occur largely in the second phase. Induced tourism is modelled as occurring in all three phases. This latter (international visitor) effect relates to expected increased visitations to Sydney and other Australian destinations generated by heightened awareness of Australia via Olympics media coverage. The simulations are conducted under the assumption that the Games have a neutral effect in the long run on the budget of the Government of New South Wales (the Australian State hosting the 2000 Olympics) and on Australia?s balance of trade. For instance, the State Government finances the Olympics construction partly by crowding out other capital works, and partly from short-term debt that is paid off, by the end of the Event year, with Games revenues and with additional tax revenue flowing from the boost the Olympics has on the State?s tax base. The labour market is assumed to be slack in the Event year, but in the Pre-Event year increased labour demand is assumed to lead partly to an increase in real wages. Additional capital stock is put in place in the Pre-Games period, but it is assumed that industry capital stocks are fixed in the Event year. The Olympics capital stock is fully used in the Event year and in other industries fixed capital stocks leads to increased rates of return, and thus temporarily higher prices. The results of the simulations indicate that the Sydney Olympics should have a significant positive effect on the New South Wales and Australian economies. The present value of the impact on real GDP and real household consumption for Australia over the three phases of the Olympics is $6.1 billion (Australian dollars) and $2.7 billion respectively. However, virtually all of this gain occurs within New South Wales, with only a very small net effect on the other five state economies. Also while the effects are large in dollar terms, in percentage change terms the increases in New South Wales Gross State Product and real household consumption are only 0.36 and 0.22 per cent respectively in an average year of the twelve-year Olympics period.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa98p498.

in new window

Date of creation: Aug 1998
Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa98p498
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Naqvi, Farzana & Peter, Matthew W, 1996. "A Multiregional, Multisectoral Model of the Australian Economy with an Illustrative Application," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(66), pages 94-113, June.
  2. Dixon, Peter B & Horridge, Mark & Johnson, David T, 1992. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of a Major Project: The Multifunction Polis," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(59), pages 272-290, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa98p498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.