IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/udc/wpaper/wp216.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incentivos Reputacionales para la Autorregulación: Un Análisis Experimental

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Nuñez
  • Jose Luis Lima

Abstract

Las industrias de bienes de confianza generalmente se encuentran organizadas como Organizaciones Autorregluadas (OA). Sin embargo, la autorregulación implica una situación de captura regulatoria por lo cual los incentivos de la OA para controlar la calidad provista en el mercado y denunciar evidencia de provisión de mala calidad no están garantizadas. En este trabajo analizamos, utilizando técnicas experimentales, si crear una reputación de buena calidad entre los consumidores es suficiente para que la OA tengan los incentivos para hacer su trabajo. Nuestros resultados ofrecen un sólido soporte a la posibilidad de que la OA realice su trabajo por motivos reputacionales en el caso en que es teóricamente factible. También encontramos evidencia de que los consumidores pueden aprender la estructura del mercado y ajustar su comportamiento hacia los equilibrios teóricos, y de esta manera suplir su falta de experimentación directa de la mala calidad y control.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Nuñez & Jose Luis Lima, 2005. "Incentivos Reputacionales para la Autorregulación: Un Análisis Experimental," Working Papers wp216, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.uchile.cl/uploads/publicacion/61f57e85-5657-4551-b53b-59a24c79baed.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fudenberg, Drew & Levine, David, 1998. "Learning in games," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3-5), pages 631-639, May.
    2. Winand Emons, 1997. "Credence Goods and Fraudelent Experts," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 28(1), pages 107-119, Spring.
    3. Cooper, David J & Garvin, Susan & Kagel, John H, 1997. "Adaptive Learning vs. Equilibrium Refinements in an Entry Limit Pricing Game," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(442), pages 553-575, May.
    4. F. Berkhout, 1999. "Essay," Energy & Environment, , vol. 10(2), pages 209-212, March.
    5. Nunez, Javier, 2001. "A model of self-regulation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 91-97, December.
    6. Plott, Charles R. & Wilde, Louis L., "undated". "Professional Diagnosis Versus Self Diagnosis: An Experimental Examination of Some Special Features of Markets with Uncertainty," Working Papers 269, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • L84 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Personal, Professional, and Business Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mohit Karnani). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deuclcl.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.