IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tow/wpaper/2020-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Healthcare Reform and Gender Specific Child Investment in Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Juergen Jung

    (Department of Economics, Towson University)

  • Vinish Shrestha

    (Department of Economics, Towson University)

Abstract

We estimate to what extent a large scale health care reform disproportionately affects the mortality rate of boys in the context of a developing country with cultural preferences favoring boys. We use arguably exogenous variations due to a health care reform—the National Health Policy—which was implemented in Nepal in 1991 along with data from the Nepal Living Standard Survey 1996 and estimate that improved quality of primary health care facilities (by one standard deviation) can reduce the mortality rate of infant boys by 3.3 percentage points but does not affect the mortality rate of infant girls. We then construct a new cost measure for access to care in newly provisioned hospitals and find that higher access costs (by one standard deviation) increase the mortality rate of infant boys by 4 percentage points after the reform but, again, do not affect the mortality rate of girls. Our analysis points to societal gender preferences for sons and the consequent neglect of daughters' health as potential drivers of some of the observed differences in mortality between genders. Our research highlights the important role of cultural norms in shaping the outcomes of large scale health care reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Juergen Jung & Vinish Shrestha, 2020. "Healthcare Reform and Gender Specific Child Investment in Developing Countries," Working Papers 2020-04, Towson University, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2021.
  • Handle: RePEc:tow:wpaper:2020-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://webapps.towson.edu/cbe/economics/workingpapers/2020-04.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Government of India, 2017. "National Health Policy 2017," Working Papers id:11664, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shawhan, Daniel L. & Picciano, Paul D., 2019. "Costs and benefits of saving unprofitable generators: A simulation case study for US coal and nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 383-400.
    2. Rice, Thomas & Unruh, Lynn Y. & van Ginneken, Ewout & Rosenau, Pauline & Barnes, Andrew J., 2018. "Universal coverage reforms in the USA: From Obamacare through Trump," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 698-702.
    3. Weng, Weizhe & Cobourn, Kelly M. & Kemanian, Armen R. & Boyle, Kevin J. & Shi, Yuning & Stachelek, Joseph & White, Charles, 2020. "Quantifying Co-Benefits of Water Quality Policies: An Integrated Assessment Model of Nitrogen Management," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304667, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Indrani Gupta, 2020. "Relying on serendipity is not enough," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 125-147, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Infant and child mortality; gender specific health investment; health inequality by gender; access to health care in developing nation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C35 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tow:wpaper:2020-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detowus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Juergen Jung (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detowus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.