IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/10-666.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving campaign success rate by tailoring donation requests along the donor lifecycle

Author

Listed:
  • G. A. VERHAERT
  • D. VAN DEN POEL

    ()

Abstract

Since charitable fundraising relies heavily on direct mail, this paper studies how tailoring donation requests along the donor lifecycle could improve campaign success rate. Our field study provides a unique combination of three parameters whose combined interaction has not been studied to this date: donor segment, suggested personalized donation amount and social comparison, resulting in a 3 x 3 x 2 between-subjects design. Taking into account the donor’s zone of acceptable prices, we show that for acquiring and reactivating donors the use of a recently suggested donation amount is most effective, whereas for retaining donors, it is preferred to use an average amount. Our results also demonstrate that social comparison is an excellent acquisition strategy, but that it could be harmful when reactivating lapsed donors. Social comparison was not found to have an effect on the donation behavior of current donors.

Suggested Citation

  • G. A. Verhaert & D. Van Den Poel, 2010. "Improving campaign success rate by tailoring donation requests along the donor lifecycle," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 10/666, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:10/666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_10_666.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    suggested donation amount; direct mail; social comparison; charitable fundraising; acquisition; retention; reactivation;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:10/666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.