IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed019/1433.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Chinese Trade on U.S. Employment: The Good, The Bad, and The Apocryphal

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Bloom

    (Stanford University)

  • Andre Kurmann

    (Drexel University)

  • Kyle Handley

    (University of Michigan)

  • Philip Luck

    (University of Colorado Denver)

Abstract

Using establishment-level micro data from the U.S. Census Bureau, this paper studies the impact of Chinese import penetration on firm reorganization and relocation across local labor markets. We find three main results. First, the negative effect of Chinese import penetration on local manufacturing employment documented in the existing literature is driven primarily by large, importing firms that simultaneously expand employment in non-manufacturing. A third of this negative manufacturing effect is accounted for by establishments switching their reported industry affiliation to non-manufacturing. Second, the reorganization of firm activity occurs mainly away from production of machinery, electronics, and transportation equipment towards wholesale, professional services (including R&D), and management. Together, the results are indicative of a “Silicone Valley” story of offshoring according to which firms focus U.S. activities on research, design, and distribution but produce the actual goods abroad. Third, the reorganization of firm activity occurs unevenly across local labor markets. The negative employment effects in manufacturing are concentrated in areas with below human capital (mainly the South and Mid-West) whereas most of the positive employment effects in non-manufacturing occur in areas with above average human capital (mainly the West and East coasts). This suggests one reason why the China shock polarizes politics.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:red:sed019:1433
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://economicdynamics.org/meetpapers/2019/paper_1433.pdf
Download Restriction: no

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed019:1433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.