IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/83088.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comprehensive Analysis of Knowledge Management Cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Mohajan, Haradhan

Abstract

At present knowledge and its proper management became an essential issue for every organization. In the modern globalized world, organizations cannot survive in a sustainable way without efficient knowledge management. Knowledge management cycle (KMC) is a process of transforming information into knowledge within an organization, which explains how knowledge is captured, processed, and distributed in an organization. For the better performance organizations require a practical and coherent strategy and comprehensive KMC. The aim of this study is to examine the KMCs and how they are playing vital role for the development of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Knowledge Management Cycles," MPRA Paper 83088, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Nov 2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:83088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83088/1/MPRA_paper_83088.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjay Mohapatra & Arjun Agrawal & Anurag Satpathy, 2016. "Designing Knowledge Management-Enabled Business Strategies," Management for Professionals, Springer, number 978-3-319-33894-1, March.
    2. Argote, Linda & Ingram, Paul, 2000. "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 150-169, May.
    3. Kimiz Dalkir, 2011. "Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262015080, December.
    4. Michael E.D Koenig, 2011. "Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd ed.)," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 2083-2083, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2022. "Mathematical Analysis of SEIR Model to Prevent COVID-19 Pandemic," MPRA Paper 115858, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Aug 2022.
    2. Mohajan, Devajit, 2023. "Mathematical Analysis of an Industry When Cost of Principal Raw Materials Increase: A Nonlinear Budget Constraint Attempt," MPRA Paper 118933, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Zuroni Md Jusoh & Thaneswary A/P Mahalingam, 2023. "Factors Influencing Green Product Purchase Behavior among University Putra Malaysia Students," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(2), pages 81-90.
    4. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2022. "Feminism and feminist grounded theory: a comprehensive research analysis," MPRA Paper 114914, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jul 2022.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anshuman Prasad & Pushkala Prasad, 2013. "Innovation in the Global Age: Implications for Business and Management in the Knowledge Economy," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(6), pages 82-89, November.
    2. Magdalena Parcheva, 2019. "Strategic Aspects of the Relation Knowledge Management - Entrepreneurial Activity of Organizations," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 8(1), pages 94-103, April.
    3. Niko Sudibjo & Siti Aulia & HG Retno Harsanti, 2022. "Empowering Personal Knowledge Management Among Teachers in Indonesia: A Multi-Faceted Approach using SEM," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    4. Lamiae Bentaleb & Saâd El Kabbaj & Mimoun Zouhdi, 2019. "Towards a Comprehensive Knowledge Management Improvement Model for Medical Laboratories," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Gilberto Borrego & Samuel González-López & Ramón R. Palacio, 2022. "Tags’ Recommender to Classify Architectural Knowledge Applying Language Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, January.
    6. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    8. Sseruyange, J. & Bulte, E., 2018. "Do Incentives matter for Knowledge Diffusion? Experimental Evidence from Uganda," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275896, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Shahid Qureshi & Sarfraz Mian, 2021. "Transfer of entrepreneurship education best practices from business schools to engineering and technology institutions: evidence from Pakistan," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 366-392, April.
    10. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing among Employees in Organizations," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 8(1), pages 52-61, March.
    11. Caligiuri, Paula & Bonache, Jaime, 2016. "Evolving and enduring challenges in global mobility," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 127-141.
    12. Young-Choon Kim & Taekjin Shin & Sangchan Park, 2021. "Enhancing firm performance through intra-group managerial experience: Evidence from group-affiliated firms in Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 435-465, June.
    13. Wang, Haiying & Moore, Jack Murdoch & Wang, Jun & Small, Michael, 2021. "The distinct roles of initial transmission and retransmission in the persistence of knowledge in complex networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    14. Gabriela Citlalli López-Torres & Gonzalo Maldonado Guzmán & Sandra Yesenia Pinzón Castro & Ricardo García Ramírez, 2016. "Collaboration and innovation activities in SMEs," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 61(3), pages 568-581, Julio-Sep.
    15. Latukha, M. & Veselova, A. & Selivanovskikh, L. & Artukh, E. & Mitskevich, E., 2016. "Re-thinking the role of talent management in a firm’s performance: Talent management practices and absorptive capacity," Working Papers 6442, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    16. Wright, Mike & Clarysse, Bart & Lockett, Andy & Knockaert, Mirjam, 2008. "Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1205-1223, September.
    17. Ion Popa & Simona Cătălina Ștefan, 2019. "Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Gabriel Szulanski & Robert J. Jensen, 2004. "Overcoming stickiness: An empirical investigation of the role of the template in the replication of organizational routines," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6-7), pages 347-363.
    19. Willy C. Shih, 2021. "Increasing the Level of Abstraction as a Strategy for Accelerating the Adoption of Complex Technologies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 54-61, March.
    20. Pantic-Dragisic, Svjetlana & Söderlund, Jonas, 2020. "Swift transition and knowledge cycling: Key capabilities for successful technical and engineering consulting?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Knowledge; Knowledge management; Meyer and Zack; Bukowitz and Williams; McElroy; Wiig KM cycles.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:83088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.