IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/dnwke_v1.html

The Electoral Effects of U.S. Prison Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Ottone, Nicholas
  • Weiss, Amanda

Abstract

From 1980 to 2000, the United States opened over 400 prisons, a rapid expansion of carceral capacity mirroring the punitive turn in public policy and public opinion. Yet few studies have examined the impact of prison construction on nearby residents and their political behavior. We develop a theoretical model tracing how prison openings affect economic, attitudinal, and electoral outcomes in surrounding communities. Using modern difference-in-difference methods and a novel county-level dataset covering forty years of prison openings, we find that prison construction decreases county-level vote share for Republican candidates, especially if Republicans represented the county during prison construction. Drawing on analyses of economic outcomes and prison bond measure support, we argue that voters sanction issue-owning Republican candidates for negative economic externalities and turn against funding for prisons. These findings challenge conventional wisdom about the political economy of prisons and have implications for how we understand contemporary expansions of carceral capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ottone, Nicholas & Weiss, Amanda, 2026. "The Electoral Effects of U.S. Prison Construction," SocArXiv dnwke_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:dnwke_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/dnwke_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6aab1454f0ea4ef0d1ce61de/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/dnwke_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leah C. Stokes, 2016. "Electoral Backlash against Climate Policy: A Natural Experiment on Retrospective Voting and Local Resistance to Public Policy," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 958-974, October.
    2. Margalit, Yotam, 2013. "Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(1), pages 80-103, February.
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h482kc28p is not listed on IDEAS
    4. White, Ariel, 2019. "Family Matters? Voting Behavior in Households with Criminal Justice Contact," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(2), pages 607-613, May.
    5. Rickard, Stephanie, 2022. "Incumbents beware: the impact of offshoring on elections," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107517, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Amy E. Lerman & Jessie Harney, 2019. "Feedback Effects and the Criminal Justice Bureaucracy: Officer Attitudes and the Future of Correctional Reform," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 685(1), pages 227-249, September.
    7. James Feigenbaum & Alexander Hertel-Fernandez & Vanessa Williamson, 2018. "From the Bargaining Table to the Ballot Box: Political Effects of Right to Work Laws," NBER Working Papers 24259, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Sides, John, 2006. "The Origins of Campaign Agendas," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 407-436, July.
    9. Kirill Borusyak & Xavier Jaravel & Jann Spiess, 2024. "Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(6), pages 3253-3285.
    10. Bueno, Natália S. & Zucco, Cesar & Nunes, Felipe, 2023. "What You See and What You Get: Direct and Indirect Political Dividends of Public Policies," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 1273-1292, October.
    11. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2019. "Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 137-150.
    12. James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2023. "Fast and reliable jackknife and bootstrap methods for cluster‐robust inference," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(5), pages 671-694, August.
    13. Regina Branton & Gavin Dillingham & Johanna Dunaway & Beth Miller, 2007. "Anglo Voting on Nativist Ballot Initiatives: The Partisan Impact of Spatial Proximity to the U.S.‐Mexico Border," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 88(3), pages 882-897, September.
    14. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h482kc28p is not listed on IDEAS
    15. De Benedictis-Kessner, Justin & Hankinson, Michael, 2019. "Concentrated Burdens: How Self-Interest and Partisanship Shape Opinion on Opioid Treatment Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(4), pages 1078-1084, November.
    16. repec:cup:apsrev:v:113:y:2019:i:04:p:1078-1084_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Bellégo, Christophe & Benatia, David & Dortet-Bernadet, Vincent, 2025. "The chained difference-in-differences," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    18. David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon Hanson & Kaveh Majlesi, 2020. "Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(10), pages 3139-3183, October.
    19. Jowei Chen, 2013. "Voter Partisanship and the Effect of Distributive Spending on Political Participation," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(1), pages 200-217, January.
    20. Pedro Albarran & Manuel Arellano, 2019. "GMM Estimation from Incomplete and Rotating Panels," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 134, pages 5-42.
    21. Riju Joshi & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2019. "Correlated Random Effects Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables and Unbalanced Panels," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 134, pages 243-268.
    22. John M. Eason, 2017. "Prisons as Panacea or Pariah? The Countervailing Consequences of the Prison Boom on the Political Economy of Rural Towns," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, January.
    23. Rickard, Stephanie J., 2022. "Incumbents Beware: The Impact of Offshoring on Elections," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 758-780, April.
    24. David, Quentin & Janiak, Alexandre & Wasmer, Etienne, 2010. "Local social capital and geographical mobility," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 191-204, September.
    25. Graham, Matthew H. & Singh, Shikhar, 2024. "An Outbreak of Selective Attribution: Partisanship and Blame in the COVID-19 Pandemic," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(1), pages 423-441, February.
    26. James J. Heckman & Jeffrey A. Smith, 1999. "The Pre-Program Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Program: Implications for Simple Program Evaluation Strategies," NBER Working Papers 6983, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    27. Peter K. Enns, 2014. "The Public's Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 857-872, October.
    28. De Benedictis-Kessner, Justin & Warshaw, Christopher, 2020. "Accountability for the Local Economy at All Levels of Government in United States Elections," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(3), pages 660-676, August.
    29. Nuamah, Sally A. & Ogorzalek, Thomas, 2021. "Close to Home: Place-Based Mobilization in Racialized Contexts," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(3), pages 757-774, August.
    30. Ellwood, David T & Fine, Glenn, 1987. "The Impact of Right-to-Work Laws on Union Organizing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(2), pages 250-273, April.
    31. Bonilla, Tabitha, 2025. "The Influence of Partisanship on Assessments of Promise Fulfillment and Accountability," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(2), pages 966-984, May.
    32. Janjala Chirakijja, 2024. "The Local Economic Impacts of Prisons," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(6), pages 1442-1459, November.
    33. Roth, Jonathan & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Bilinski, Alyssa & Poe, John, 2023. "What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2218-2244.
    34. Yiwen Zhang, 2024. "Did the Prison Industrial Complex Deliver on Its Promise? Prison Proliferation and Employment in Rural America," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 64(1), pages 229-247.
    35. Blackwell, Matthew & Glynn, Adam N., 2018. "How to Make Causal Inferences with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data under Selection on Observables," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(4), pages 1067-1082, November.
    36. Jensen, J. Bradford & Quinn, Dennis P. & Weymouth, Stephen, 2017. "Winners and Losers in International Trade: The Effects on US Presidential Voting," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(3), pages 423-457, July.
    37. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    38. Heckman, James J & Smith, Jeffrey A, 1999. "The Pre-programme Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Programme. Implications for Simple Programme Evaluation Strategies," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 109(457), pages 313-348, July.
    39. Jan A. Brakel & Sabine Krieg, 2016. "Small area estimation with state space common factor models for rotating panels," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(3), pages 763-791, June.
    40. Sunny R. Karim & Morten {O}rregaard Nielsen & James G. MacKinnon & Matthew D. Webb, 2026. "Improved Inference for CSDID Using the Cluster Jackknife," Papers 2602.12043, arXiv.org.
    41. David, Quentin & Janiak, Alexandre & Wasmer, Etienne, 2010. "Local social capital and geographical mobility," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 191-204, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2026. "Estimating Causal Effects With Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 356-382, June.
    2. Su, Liangjun & Wang, Fa & Wang, Yiren, 2026. "Estimation and inference for unbalanced panel data models with interactive fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Diego F. Salazar & Noah Lim & Ingrid Koch, 2026. "Job Security, Gender, and Sales Performance: Evidence from a Retail Sales Context," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 80-107, January.
    4. Bao Hoang Nguyen & Shawna Grosskopf & Jongsay Yong & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2024. "Activity‐based funding reform and the performance of public hospitals: The case of Queensland, Australia," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(4), pages 1679-1701, October.
    5. Daniele, Federica & de Blasio, Guido & Pasquini, Alessandra, 2026. "Is local opposition taking the wind out of the energy transition?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Sunny R. Karim & Morten {O}rregaard Nielsen & James G. MacKinnon & Matthew D. Webb, 2026. "Improved Inference for CSDID Using the Cluster Jackknife," Papers 2602.12043, arXiv.org.
    7. Huang, Yujie & Zhang, Guoqing & Chen, Xiaofeng & Du, Kerui, 2025. "From awareness to action: The role of ESG committees in driving corporate ambidextrous green innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Dami'an Vergara, 2022. "Minimum Wages and Optimal Redistribution," Papers 2202.00839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    9. Abramova, Inna, 2024. "Labor supply and M&A in the audit market," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1).
    10. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2023. "Simple approaches to nonlinear difference-in-differences with panel data," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(3), pages 31-66.
    11. Kikuchi, Shinnosuke, 2026. "Who bears the burden? Heterogeneous labor market penalties of child and eldercare," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Florian F Gunsilius, 2025. "A primer on optimal transport for causal inference with observational data," Papers 2503.07811, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    13. Ratzanyel Rinc'on & Kyungchul Song, 2025. "Causal Inference with Groupwise Matching," Papers 2510.26106, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    14. Gregory Faletto, 2023. "Fused Extended Two-Way Fixed Effects for Difference-in-Differences With Staggered Adoptions," Papers 2312.05985, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    15. Tenaw, Dagmawe & Greco, Luciano & Rettore, Enrico, 2026. "Household energy poverty amidst large-scale electrification: Impacts of grid reliability and off-grid solar technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Isaac Gerber, 2026. "Design-Based Variance Estimation for Modern Heterogeneity-Robust Difference-in-Differences Estimators," Papers 2605.04124, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    17. Clarke, Dylan R. & Gold, Daniel E., 2024. "The effects of residential landlord–tenant laws: New evidence from Canadian reforms using census data," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    18. Di Francesco, Riccardo & Mellace, Giovanni, 2025. "Causal inference for qualitative outcomes," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    19. Massimo Anelli & Italo Colantone & Piero Stanig, 2019. "We Were the Robots: Automation and Voting Behavior in Western Europe," CESifo Working Paper Series 7758, CESifo.
    20. Crescioli, Tommaso & Van Overbeke, Toon, 2026. "Rising market power and its political discontents," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 141231, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:dnwke_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.