IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v685y2019i1p227-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feedback Effects and the Criminal Justice Bureaucracy: Officer Attitudes and the Future of Correctional Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Amy E. Lerman
  • Jessie Harney

Abstract

Although political scientists have documented the effects of incarceration on those serving time in prison and jail, there has been much less discussion about feedback effects on the attitudes of those who work in correctional institutions. This is a considerable oversight, given the enormous growth of the correctional workforce and its importance in the implementation of crime policy. In this article, we present original survey data from a large sample of California correctional officers. Our analyses suggest that characteristics of the institutions where correctional officers work—the levels of violence to which they are exposed, the proportion of inmates involved in high-quality rehabilitation programs, as well as the quality of management—help to shape officers’ attitudes toward rehabilitation. These dynamics have important implications for how public policies can create political constituencies among criminal justice officers. The attitudes of these officers should therefore be a concern for scholars, advocates, and practitioners who are interested in political strategies for long-term, meaningful reform to the correctional system.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy E. Lerman & Jessie Harney, 2019. "Feedback Effects and the Criminal Justice Bureaucracy: Officer Attitudes and the Future of Correctional Reform," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 685(1), pages 227-249, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:685:y:2019:i:1:p:227-249
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716219869907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219869907
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716219869907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:685:y:2019:i:1:p:227-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.