IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00696122.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Interplay Between Creativity issues and Design Theories: a new perspective for Design Management Studies?

Author

Listed:
  • Pascal Le Masson

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Armand Hatchuel

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Benoit Weil

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the relationship between creativity issues and design theory. Although these two notions seemingly correspond to different academic fields (psychology, cognitive science and management for creativity; engineering science and logic for design theory), they appear to be deeply related when it comes to design methods and management. Analyzing three historical moments in design theory-building (the 1850s, with the ratio method for industrial upgrading in Germany; the 20th century with systematic design and the 1920s with the Bauhaus theory), we point to the dialectical interplay that links creativity and design theory, structured around the notion of "fixation effect": creativity identifies fixation effects, which become the targets of new design theories; design theories invent models of thought to overcome them; and, in turn, these design theories can also create new fixation effects that will then be designated by creativity studies. This dialectical interplay leads to regular inventions of new ways of managing design, ie new ways of managing knowledge, processes and organizations for design activities. We use this framework to analyze recent trends in creativity and design theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Benoit Weil, 2011. "The Interplay Between Creativity issues and Design Theories: a new perspective for Design Management Studies?," Post-Print hal-00696122, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00696122
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00613.x
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-00696122v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-00696122v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00613.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan MacCormack & Roberto Verganti & Marco Iansiti, 2001. "Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 133-150, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabien Jean & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2015. "Sourcing Innovation: probing Technology Readiness Levels with a design framework," Post-Print hal-01249946, HAL.
    2. Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2017. "C-K theory: modelling creative thinking and its impact on research," Post-Print hal-01701853, HAL.
    3. Pierre-Antoine Arrighi & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2013. "Breaking the dilemma between robustness and generativeness: a comparative experiment on the use of new design software at the design-gap," Post-Print hal-00903606, HAL.
    4. Armand Hatchuel, 2013. "Deconstructing meaning: Industrial design as Adornment and Wit," Post-Print hal-00903421, HAL.
    5. Beatrice d'Ippolito, 2014. "The importance of design for firms' competitiveness: a review of the literature," Working Papers hal-00936947, HAL.
    6. Beatrice d'Ippolito, 2014. "The importance of design for firms' competitiveness: a review of the literature," Working paper serie RMT - Grenoble Ecole de Management hal-00936947, HAL.
    7. Pierre-Antoine Arrighi & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2014. "Addressing Constraints Creatively: How New Design Software Helps Solve the Dilemma of Originality and Feasibility," Post-Print hal-01083248, HAL.
    8. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Benoit Weil, 2015. "Design theory at Bauhaus: teaching “splitting” knowledge," Post-Print hal-01243332, HAL.
    9. Armand Hatchuel & Milena Klasing Chen, 2017. "Creativity under Strong Constraints: the Hidden Influence of Design Models traduction," Post-Print hal-01465689, HAL.
    10. Louis-Etienne Dubois & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Patrick Cohendet, 2014. "From organizing for innovation to innovating for organization: how co-design brings about change in organizations," Post-Print hal-01485082, HAL.
    11. Zeiler, Wim, 2018. "Morphology in conceptual building design," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 102-115.
    12. Sophie Hooge & Milena Klasing Chen & Dominique Laousse, 2018. "Dynamics of innovative concepts in exploratory projects: managing consistency between originality, collaboration and strategy," Post-Print hal-01900545, HAL.
    13. Louis-Etienne Dubois & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Patrick Cohendet, 2014. "From organizing for innovation to innovating for organization: how co-design fosters change in organizations," Post-Print hal-00981108, HAL.
    14. Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2017. "C-K Theory : Modelling Creative Thinking And Its Impact On Research," Post-Print hal-01619990, HAL.
    15. Sophie Hooge & Albert David, 2014. "What makes an efficient theme for a creativity session?," Post-Print hal-00987220, HAL.
    16. Rahobisoa Herimalala & Olivier Gaussens, 2012. "X-Efficiency of Innovation Processes: Evaluation Based on Data Envelopment Analysis," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201215, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    17. Secundo, Giustina & Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Simeone, Luca & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2020. "Creativity and stakeholders' engagement in open innovation: Design for knowledge translation in technology-intensive enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 272-282.
    18. Marné Vries & Simone Berger, 2017. "An Action Design Research Approach within Enterprise Engineering," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 187-207, April.
    19. Pierre-Antoine Arrighi & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2015. "Managing radical innovation as an innovative design process: generative constraints and cumulative sets of rules," Post-Print hal-01199932, HAL.
    20. Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Yoram Reich & Eswaran Subrahmanian, 2018. "Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering," Post-Print hal-01633021, HAL.
    21. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Benoit Weil, 2016. "Design theory at Bauhaus: teaching 'splitting' knowledge," Post-Print hal-01481058, HAL.
    22. Della Rossa, Pauline & Mottes, Charles & Cattan, Philippe & Le Bail, Marianne, 2022. "A new method to co-design agricultural systems at the territorial scale - Application to reduce herbicide pollution in Martinique," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    23. Sophie Hooge & Milena Klasing Chen & Dominique Laousse, 2019. "Managing the emergence of concepts in fuzzy front end: a framework of strategic performance and emerging process of innovation briefs," Post-Print hal-02167857, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qingyu & Vonderembse, Mark A. & Cao, Mei, 2009. "Product concept and prototype flexibility in manufacturing: Implications for customer satisfaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 143-154, April.
    2. Paris Chrysos, 2018. "Empathy in the business model: how Facebook and Google Maps manage external problem-solving processes," Working Papers halshs-01897205, HAL.
    3. Indranil R. Bardhan & Vish V. Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2007. "Project Performance and the Enabling Role of Information Technology: An Exploratory Study on the Role of Alignment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 579-595, May.
    4. Ale Ebrahim, Nader & Ahmed, Shamsuddin & Taha, Zahari, 2010. "SMEs; Virtual research and development (R&D) teams and new product development: A literature review," MPRA Paper 26989, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jun 2010.
    5. Carol Ann McDevitt & Eric C Cahill & Craig Stambaugh, 2004. "System‐level application of the evolutionary product development process to manufactured goods," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 144-152.
    6. Elaine Tavares & Cristina Castro-Lucas & Mbaye Fall Dialo & Pierre -Yves Leo & Marie-Christine Longe Monnoyer & Jean Philippe, 2011. "The Influence of Mobile ICT Use on Service Innovation Capabilities," Post-Print hal-02556278, HAL.
    7. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Mario Le Glatin & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Designing Decisions In The Unknown: Towards A Generative Decision Model For Management Science," Post-Print hal-01937103, HAL.
    8. Di Stefano, Giada & Gambardella, Alfonso & Verona, Gianmario, 2012. "Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1283-1295.
    9. Candi, Marina & Beltagui, Ahmad, 2019. "Effective use of 3D printing in the innovation process," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 63-73.
    10. Niels Jørgensen, 2007. "Developer autonomy in the FreeBSD open source project," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 11(2), pages 119-128, May.
    11. Satish Nambisan, 2002. "Complementary Product Integration by High-Technology New Ventures: The Role of Initial Technology Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 382-398, March.
    12. Paris Chrysos, 2015. "Value Care: Managing The Emerging. The Case Of Developer Support Forums," Post-Print halshs-01584767, HAL.
    13. Melissa A. Valentine & Tom Fangyun Tan & Bradley R. Staats & Amy C. Edmondson, 2019. "Fluid Teams and Knowledge Retrieval: Scaling Service Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 346-360, May.
    14. Pierre-Antoine Arrighi & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2015. "Managing radical innovation as an innovative design process: generative constraints and cumulative sets of rules," Post-Print hal-01199932, HAL.
    15. Serghei Floricel & Sorin Piperca & Richard Tee, 2018. "Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, May.
    16. HANEDA Shoko & IKEDA Yuya, 2019. "Determinants of Staged Project Management and Success in Innovation: Empirical Analysis based on the Japanese National Innovation Survey," Discussion papers 19094, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    17. Yakob, Ramsin, 2018. "Augmenting Local Managerial Capacity Through Knowledge Collectivities: The Case of Volvo Car China," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 386-403.
    18. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2007. "Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 181-199, April.
    19. Robert D. Austin & Lee Devin, 2009. "Research Commentary ---Weighing the Benefits and Costs of Flexibility in Making Software: Toward a Contingency Theory of the Determinants of Development Process Design," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 462-477, September.
    20. van Riel, A.C.R. & Lievens, A., 2003. "New service development in high tech sectors: a decision making perspective," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00696122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.