IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/gemptp/hal-00946932.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Disassembly and reassembly on digital technology and creative industries

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Mangematin

    (MTS - Management Technologique et Strategique - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management)

  • Jonathan Sapsed

    (University of Brighton)

  • Elke Schüssler

    (Freie Universität Berlin)

Abstract

This paper analyses the dynamics of disassembly and reassembly unfolding in selected creative industries through the advent of digital technology. It argues that a full understanding of the much-observed organizational or sectoral lock-in effects on the one hand, and the possibilities for transformation and innovation on the other is only gained by analyzing jointly how institutional logics, business models and creative processes are affected by digital technology and how they interrelate in producing stability or change. These three dimensions provide a framework for reviewing the findings of the papers comprised in the Special Issue and for integrating their insights towards a research agenda. This introduction starts with a reflection on creative industries classification systems and related possibilities for generalization and discusses how digital technology acts as a driver for disassembly and reassembly. It concludes by highlighting three avenues for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Mangematin & Jonathan Sapsed & Elke Schüssler, 2014. "Disassembly and reassembly on digital technology and creative industries," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00946932, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-00946932
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.002
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00946932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00946932/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Tripsas & Giovanni Gavetti, 2000. "Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1147-1161, October.
    2. Alan D. Meyer & Vibha Gaba & Kenneth A. Colwell, 2005. "Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 456-473, October.
    3. Dolata, Ulrich, 2009. "Technological innovations and sectoral change: Transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change: An analytical framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 1066-1076, July.
    4. Birgitte Andersen & Richard Kozul-Wright & Zeljka Kozul-Wright, 2007. "Rents, Rights N'Rhythm: Cooperation, Conflict and Capabilities in the Music Industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 513-540.
    5. Joseph Lampel & Theresa Lant & Jamal Shamsie, 2000. "Balancing Act: Learning from Organizing Practices in Cultural Industries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 263-269, June.
    6. Fiorenza Belussi & Silvia Rita Sedita, 2008. "Managing Situated Creativity in Cultural Industries," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 457-458.
    7. Jochen Koch, 2008. "Strategic Paths and Media Management – a Path Dependency Analysis of the German Newspaper Branch of High Quality Journalism," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 60(1), pages 50-73, January.
    8. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2013. "Business models: A challenging agenda," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00869707, HAL.
    9. Andrew Currah, 2007. "Hollywood, the Internet and the World: A Geography of Disruptive Innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 359-384.
    10. Peter Tschmuck, 2006. "Creativity and Innovation in the Music Industry," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4020-4275-1, June.
    11. Mary J. Benner, 2010. "Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 42-62, February.
    12. Kevin Stolarick & Charlotta Mellander & Richard Florida, 2010. "Creative Jobs, Industries and Places," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laïfi, Amira & Josserand, Emmanuel, 2016. "Legitimation in practice: A new digital publishing business model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2343-2352.
    2. Muhieddine Ramadan & Najib Bou Zakhem & Hala Baydoun & Amira Daouk & Samia Youssef & Abir El Fawal & Jean Elia & Ahmad Ashaal, 2023. "Toward Digital Transformation and Business Model Innovation: The Nexus between Leadership, Organizational Agility, and Knowledge Transfer," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Merja Lina Bauters & Darja Tokranova & Liyanachchi Mahesha Harshani De Silva & Juri Mets, 2023. "The Exploration of Skill Gaps and Ecosystem Potential among Estonian Creatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Xu Sun & Xiaosong Zhou & Qingfeng Wang & Pinyan Tang & Effie Lai-Chong Law & Sue Cobb, 2021. "Understanding attitudes towards intellectual property from the perspective of design professionals," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 521-543, June.
    5. Zahra, Shaker A. & Liu, Wan & Si, Steven, 2023. "How digital technology promotes entrepreneurship in ecosystems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Magno, Francesca, 2017. "The influence of cultural blogs on their readers’ cultural product choices," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 142-149.
    7. Jen Snowball & Delon Tarentaal & Jonathan Sapsed, 2021. "Innovation and diversity in the digital cultural and creative industries," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(4), pages 705-733, December.
    8. Liu, Yang & Dong, Jiuyu & Ying, Ying & Jiao, Hao, 2021. "Status and digital innovation: A middle-status conformity perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Elisa Salvador & Jean-Paul Simon & Pierre-Jean Benghozi, 2019. "Facing disruption: the cinema value chain in the digital age," Post-Print hal-02300929, HAL.
    10. Syed Sheheryar Ali Kazmi & Muhammad Hashim & Daisy Mui Hung Kee & Farid Ullah Khan, 2016. "Social Entrepreneurship and its Impact on Economy: In Perspective of Pakistan," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(4), pages 161-166, October.
    11. Fauchart, Emmanuelle & Bacache-Beauvallet, Maya & Bourreau, Marc & Moreau, François, 2022. "Do-It-Yourself or Do-It-Together: How digital technologies affect creating alone or with others?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Christer Gustafsson & Elisabetta Lazzaro, 2021. "The Innovative Response of Cultural and Creative Industries to Major European Societal Challenges: Toward a Knowledge and Competence Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Laima Gerlitz & Gunnar Klaus Prause, 2021. "Cultural and Creative Industries as Innovation and Sustainable Transition Brokers in the Baltic Sea Region: A Strong Tribute to Sustainable Macro-Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Daniel A. Skog, 2016. "Local game, global rules: exploring technological heterogeneity exploitation in digital creative cluster evolution," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 531-550, August.
    15. Ernkvist, Mirko, 2015. "Velocity shifts in the creative economy: incumbent-entrant dynamics in the emergence of Japanese social games," Ratio Working Papers 267, The Ratio Institute.
    16. Landoni, Paolo & Dell’era, Claudio & Frattini, Federico & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Verganti, Roberto & Manelli, Luca, 2020. "Business model innovation in cultural and creative industries: Insights from three leading mobile gaming firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    17. Shen, Xiaobai & Williams, Robin & Zheng, Shufeng & Liu, Yinliang & Li, Yixiao & Gerst, Martina, 2019. "Digital online music in China – A “laboratory” for business experiment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 235-249.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:gemwpa:hal-00946932 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Vincent Mangematin & Jonathan Sapsed & Elke Schüssler, 2014. "Disassembly and reassembly on digital technology and creative industries," Post-Print hal-00946932, HAL.
    3. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00946932 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    5. Pinar Ozcan & Douglas Hannah, 2020. "Social Origins of Great Strategies Advertising Suppliers to Realize Disruptive Social Media Technology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 193-217, September.
    6. Omar A. El Sawy & Arvind Malhotra & YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 835-848, December.
    7. Zhou, Dan & Kautonen, Mika & Dai, Weiqi & Zhang, Hui, 2021. "Exploring how digitalization influences incumbents in financial services: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, firm assets, and organizational legitimacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Giovanni Gavetti, 2012. "PERSPECTIVE—Toward a Behavioral Theory of Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 267-285, February.
    9. Nathan R. Furr & Daniel C. Snow, 2015. "Intergenerational Hybrids: Spillbacks, Spillforwards, and Adapting to Technology Discontinuities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 475-493, April.
    10. Anindya Ghosh & Xavier Martin & Johannes M. Pennings & Filippo Carlo Wezel, 2014. "Ambition Is Nothing Without Focus: Compensating for Negative Transfer of Experience in R&D," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 572-590, April.
    11. Hakan Ozalp & J.P. Eggers & Franco Malerba, 2023. "Hitting reset: Industry evolution, generational technology cycles, and the dynamic value of firm experience," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1292-1327, May.
    12. Dolata, Ulrich, 2011. "The music industry and the internet: A decade of disruptive and uncontrolled sectoral change," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2011-02, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    13. Peter B. Doeringer & Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2013. "Project-based industries and craft-like production: structure, location and performance," Chapters, in: Frank Giarratani & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Philip McCann (ed.), Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography, chapter 4, pages 99-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Vibha Gaba & John Joseph, 2013. "Corporate Structure and Performance Feedback: Aspirations and Adaptation in M-Form Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1102-1119, August.
    15. Sean T. Hsu & Susan K. Cohen, 2022. "Overcoming the Incumbent Dilemma: The Dual Roles of Multimarket Contact During Disruption," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 319-348, March.
    16. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    17. van den Oever, Koen, 2017. "Uncharted waters : A behavioral approach to when, why and which organizational changes are adopted," Other publications TiSEM 0136c8c2-ecdd-4f82-8ca7-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Alessio Cozzolino & Gianmario Verona, 2024. "Decision tree for adaptation after radical changes: linking dynamic capabilities, ambidexterity, and strategic alliances," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(3), pages 745-769, September.
    19. Brian Wu & Zhixi Wan & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2014. "Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(9), pages 1257-1278, September.
    20. Ansari, Shahzad (Shaz) & Krop, Pieter, 2012. "Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1357-1374.
    21. Emilie R. Feldman, 2016. "Corporate spinoffs and analysts' coverage decisions: The implications for diversified firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1196-1219, July.
    22. Nadine Kammerlander & Andreas König & Melanie Richards, 2018. "Why Do Incumbents Respond Heterogeneously to Disruptive Innovations? The Interplay of Domain Identity and Role Identity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1122-1165, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digital technology; creative industries; innovation; business models; institutional change; institutional logics; creative processes;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-00946932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.