IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Fertilizer Consumption and Agricultural Productivity in Ethiopia

Listed author(s):
  • Kefyalew Endale


    (Ethiopian Development Research Institute)

This study analyzes fertilizer application rates, trends in the number of users, its effects on agricultural productivity and, finally, the determinants of its consumption. The major data sources are the Central Statistical Authority (CSA) and the Ethiopian Rural Household Survey (ERHS). The national level evidence shows incremental increases in total fertilizer imports as well as in the applied volume of fertilizer. The household level data show that the average number of farmers that apply fertilizer is high especially in teff and wheat. The percentage of farmers who apply Urea in particular is, however, low as it does not exceed 36% in any of the five crops. The data also show some decline in the number of adopters, especially in 2004. The high price of fertilizer is the major constraint for about 47.6% of the farmers under consideration, followed by supply shortage and late arrival of fertilizer. The effect of fertilizer use on the value of agricultural production and yield is positive. Partial correlations and panel regression results support the positive effect. However, the magnitude with which the value of production responds to a change in fertilizer use is low. The smaller marginal effects of fertilizer use might be due to problems arising from applying below recommended rates and failure to use the two nutrients in proper combination. Finally, the consumption model reveals that education status of the household head is the most important variable affecting fertilizer use. Livestock ownership, size of land owned, amount of credit, and number of family members with sub-compulsory education are the other factors affecting fertilizer use positively. The study identified priority areas of interventions to address the problem of fertilizer use and its consumption. The highest priority area of intervention in the supply side is the price of fertilizer. Almost 50% of the farmers reported the price as their biggest constraint. This necessitates thinking about alternative means like crop specific partial subsidies of fertilizer and cash transfers. On the farmers’ side, they are not using the fertilizer as per recommended levels and also they are using only one of the two, mainly Dap. This is again largely caused by the price of fertilizer.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Ethiopian Development Research Institute in its series Working Papers with number 003.

in new window

Length: 20 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2011
Handle: RePEc:etd:wpaper:003
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Xiaobo Zhang & Shenggen Fan, 2001. "Estimating Crop-Specific Production Technologies in Chinese Agriculture: A Generalized Maximum Entropy Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(2), pages 378-388.
  2. Vernon W. Ruttan, 2002. "Productivity Growth in World Agriculture: Sources and Constraints," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 161-184, Fall.
  3. Yonas Alem & Mintewab Bezabih & Menale Kassie & Precious Zikhali, 2010. "Does fertilizer use respond to rainfall variability? Panel data evidence from Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(2), pages 165-175, 03.
  4. Kim, H Youn, 1992. "The Translog Production Function and Variable Returns to Scale," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 74(3), pages 546-552, August.
  5. Assefa, Admassie & Gezahegn, Ayele, 2010. "Adoption of Improved Technology in Ethiopia," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 19(1).
  6. Banerjee, Anindya, 1999. " Panel Data Unit Roots and Cointegration: An Overview," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(0), pages 607-629, Special I.
  7. Demeke, Mulat & Kelly, Valerie A. & Jayne, Thomas S. & Said, Ali & Le Vallee, Jean-Charles & Chen, H., 1998. "Agricultural Market Performance and Determinants of Fertilizer Use in Ethiopia," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 55599, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etd:wpaper:003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dagmawi Atnafu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.