IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dip/dpaper/2013-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Politicians Serve the One Percent? Evidence in OECD Countries

Author

Abstract

Present social movements, as "Occupy Wall Street" or the Spanish "Indignados", claim that politicians work for an economic elite, the 1%, that drives the world economic policies. In this paper we show through econometric analysis that these movements are accurate: politicians in OECD countries maximize the happiness of the economic elite. In 2009 center-right parties maximized the happiness of the 100th-98th richest percentile and center-left parties the 100th-95th richest percentile. The situation has evolved from the seventies when politicians represented, approximately, the median voter.

Suggested Citation

  • Torija, P., 2013. "Do Politicians Serve the One Percent? Evidence in OECD Countries," CITYPERC Working Paper Series 2013-04, Department of International Politics, City University London.
  • Handle: RePEc:dip:dpaper:2013-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/2114/1/CITYPERC-WPS-2013_04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonardo Felli & Antonio Merlo, 2006. "Endogenous Lobbying," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 4(1), pages 180-215, March.
    2. Axel Dreher & Friedrich Schneider, 2010. "Corruption and the shadow economy: an empirical analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 215-238, July.
    3. Chris Edmond, 2013. "Information Manipulation, Coordination, and Regime Change," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 80(4), pages 1422-1458.
    4. Richard E. Baldwin & Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, 2007. "Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 5(5), pages 1064-1093, September.
    5. Claudio Ferraz & Frederico Finan, 2011. "Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1274-1311, June.
    6. Niklas Potrafke, 2009. "Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 105-124, July.
    7. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2008. "Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(1), pages 267-293, March.
    8. Anthony Downs, 1957. "An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65, pages 135-135.
    9. Charles Revelle & David Marks & Jon C. Liebman, 1970. "An Analysis of Private and Public Sector Location Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(11), pages 692-707, July.
    10. James E. Alt & David Dreyer Lassen, 2010. "Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from US States," EPRU Working Paper Series 2010-08, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    11. Prat, Andrea & Strömberg, David, 2011. "The Political Economy of Mass Media," CEPR Discussion Papers 8246, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Inequality, evolution & complexity
      by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2013-03-22 20:04:39
    2. 'Inequality, Evolution, & Complexity'
      by Mark Thoma in Economist's View on 2013-03-22 22:59:55
    3. Who cares about the median voter? Not the politicians, maybe
      by Economic Logician in Economic Logic on 2013-04-05 20:26:00
    4. Radical Centrism: Uniting the Radical Left and the Radical Right
      by Ashwin in Macroeconomic Resilience on 2013-04-08 18:54:59
    5. Age, luck & unearned privilege
      by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2013-05-01 18:23:22
    6. What can governments do?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-05-22 13:50:00
    7. Housing vs financial wealth
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-05-24 11:53:00
    8. Economists' advice
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-06-01 09:27:00
    9. Why not worker control?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-07-20 12:41:00
    10. 'Why Not Worker Control?'
      by Mark Thoma in Economist's View on 2014-07-20 13:46:53
    11. See no evil
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-07-24 13:48:00
    12. False democracy
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-09-01 13:23:00
    13. Defending markets
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-09-19 13:20:00
    14. How to attack Labour leaders
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-09-23 12:34:00
    15. The economy as hyperreality
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-10-01 13:30:00
    16. Leaders' constraints
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-10-15 12:29:00
    17. Out of touch?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-10-13 13:44:00
    18. Is democratic Keynesianism possible?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2015-02-02 14:24:00
    19. 'Is Democratic Keynesianism Possible?'
      by Mark Thoma in Economist's View on 2015-02-03 16:44:11
    20. Why Miliband is right
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2015-02-26 13:43:00
    21. Alienation: the non-issue
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2015-03-25 13:19:00
    22. Some election non-issues
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2015-04-02 14:00:00
    23. Guest Post: Inequality Undermines Democracy
      by Tyler Durden in Zero Hedge on 2015-10-29 04:05:00
    24. The paradox of plenty
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2016-01-07 14:28:00
    25. Why not full employment?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2016-04-23 12:03:00
    26. On Burkean Marxism
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2016-11-13 12:38:00
    27. Chris Dillow — On Burkean Marxism
      by contrarianmedia@hotmail.com (Mike Norman) in Mike Norman Economics on 2016-11-13 22:17:00
    28. How capitalist power works
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2017-03-09 13:52:00
    29. Willing the ends but not the means
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2017-08-22 12:39:00
    30. The impact bias against Labour
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2017-09-29 12:51:00
    31. On capitalist hegemony
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2018-01-18 13:42:00
    32. Getting away with murder
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2018-03-06 13:30:01

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dip:dpaper:2013-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Research Publications Librarian). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/cpcituk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.