IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Politicians Serve the One Percent? Evidence in OECD Countries



Present social movements, as "Occupy Wall Street" or the Spanish "Indignados", claim that politicians work for an economic elite, the 1%, that drives the world economic policies. In this paper we show through econometric analysis that these movements are accurate: politicians in OECD countries maximize the happiness of the economic elite. In 2009 center-right parties maximized the happiness of the 100th-98th richest percentile and center-left parties the 100th-95th richest percentile. The situation has evolved from the seventies when politicians represented, approximately, the median voter.

Suggested Citation

  • Torija, P., 2013. "Do Politicians Serve the One Percent? Evidence in OECD Countries," CITYPERC Working Paper Series 2013-04, Department of International Politics, City University London.
  • Handle: RePEc:dip:dpaper:2013-04

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Leonardo Felli & Antonio Merlo, 2006. "Endogenous Lobbying," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 4(1), pages 180-215, March.
    2. Anthony Downs, 1957. "An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65, pages 135-135.
    3. Axel Dreher & Friedrich Schneider, 2010. "Corruption and the shadow economy: an empirical analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 215-238, July.
    4. Chris Edmond, 2013. "Information Manipulation, Coordination, and Regime Change," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 80(4), pages 1422-1458.
    5. Charles Revelle & David Marks & Jon C. Liebman, 1970. "An Analysis of Private and Public Sector Location Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(11), pages 692-707, July.
    6. Richard E. Baldwin & Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, 2007. "Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 5(5), pages 1064-1093, September.
    7. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2008. "Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(1), pages 267-293, March.
    8. James E. Alt & David Dreyer Lassen, 2010. "Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from US States," EPRU Working Paper Series 2010-08, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    9. Claudio Ferraz & Frederico Finan, 2011. "Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1274-1311, June.
    10. Prat, Andrea & Strömberg, David, 2011. "The Political Economy of Mass Media," CEPR Discussion Papers 8246, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Niklas Potrafke, 2009. "Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 105-124, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Blog mentions

    As found by, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Inequality, evolution & complexity
      by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2013-03-22 20:04:39
    2. 'Inequality, Evolution, & Complexity'
      by Mark Thoma in Economist's View on 2013-03-22 22:59:55
    3. Who cares about the median voter? Not the politicians, maybe
      by Economic Logician in Economic Logic on 2013-04-05 20:26:00
    4. Radical Centrism: Uniting the Radical Left and the Radical Right
      by Ashwin in Macroeconomic Resilience on 2013-04-08 18:54:59
    5. Age, luck & unearned privilege
      by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2013-05-01 18:23:22
    6. What can governments do?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-05-22 13:50:00
    7. Housing vs financial wealth
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-05-24 11:53:00
    8. Economists' advice
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-06-01 09:27:00
    9. Why not worker control?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-07-20 12:41:00
    10. 'Why Not Worker Control?'
      by Mark Thoma in Economist's View on 2014-07-20 13:46:53
    11. See no evil
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-07-24 13:48:00
    12. False democracy
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-09-01 13:23:00
    13. Defending markets
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-09-19 13:20:00
    14. How to attack Labour leaders
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-09-23 12:34:00
    15. The economy as hyperreality
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-10-01 13:30:00
    16. Leaders' constraints
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-10-15 12:29:00
    17. Out of touch?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2014-10-13 13:44:00
    18. Is democratic Keynesianism possible?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2015-02-02 14:24:00
    19. 'Is Democratic Keynesianism Possible?'
      by Mark Thoma in Economist's View on 2015-02-03 16:44:11
    20. Why Miliband is right
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2015-02-26 13:43:00
    21. Alienation: the non-issue
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2015-03-25 13:19:00
    22. Some election non-issues
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2015-04-02 14:00:00
    23. Guest Post: Inequality Undermines Democracy
      by Tyler Durden in Zero Hedge on 2015-10-29 04:05:00
    24. The paradox of plenty
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2016-01-07 14:28:00
    25. Why not full employment?
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2016-04-23 12:03:00
    26. On Burkean Marxism
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2016-11-13 12:38:00
    27. Chris Dillow — On Burkean Marxism
      by (Mike Norman) in Mike Norman Economics on 2016-11-13 22:17:00
    28. How capitalist power works
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2017-03-09 13:52:00
    29. Willing the ends but not the means
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2017-08-22 12:39:00
    30. The impact bias against Labour
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2017-09-29 12:51:00
    31. On capitalist hegemony
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2018-01-18 13:42:00
    32. Getting away with murder
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2018-03-06 13:30:01
    33. On top tax rates
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2019-01-24 13:45:47
    34. Great economics, bad politics
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2020-01-16 13:47:59
    35. Technocrats & class
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2020-05-06 13:07:59
    36. Reclaiming freedom
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2020-07-09 12:53:31
    37. Endogenous policy
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2021-01-24 13:09:48
    38. It's not the 90s any more
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2021-02-17 14:01:11
    39. Noise, interests & democracy
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2021-02-25 14:10:23
    40. Capitalists against competition
      by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2021-04-19 15:26:55
    41. Capital's political power
      by chris in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2021-04-29 12:56:31

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andersen, Jørgen Juel & Heggedal, Tom-Reiel, 2019. "Political rents and voter information in search equilibrium," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 146-168.
    2. William Pyle & Laura Solanko, 2013. "The composition and interests of Russia’s business lobbies: testing Olson’s hypothesis of the “encompassing organization”," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 19-41, April.
    3. Julia Rothbauer & Gernot Sieg, 2013. "Public Service Broadcasting of Sport, Shows, and News to Mitigate Rational Ignorance," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 21-40, March.
    4. Jan Fałkowski & Alessandro Olper, 2014. "Political competition and policy choices: the evidence from agricultural protection," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(2), pages 143-158, March.
    5. Matthew Gentzkow & Jesse M. Shapiro & Michael Sinkinson, 2014. "Competition and Ideological Diversity: Historical Evidence from US Newspapers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3073-3114, October.
    6. Gouvêa, Raphael & Girardi, Daniele, 2021. "Partisanship and local fiscal policy: Evidence from Brazilian cities," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Jamie Bologna, 2017. "Contagious corruption, informal employment, and income: evidence from Brazilian municipalities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(1), pages 67-118, January.
    8. Eugen Dimant & Guglielmo Tosato, 2018. "Causes And Effects Of Corruption: What Has Past Decade'S Empirical Research Taught Us? A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 335-356, April.
    9. Belke, Ansgar & Potrafke, Niklas, 2012. "Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 1126-1139.
    10. Markus Leibrecht & Michael Klien & Oezlem Onaran, 2011. "Globalization, welfare regimes and social protection expenditures in Western and Eastern European countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 569-594, September.
    11. Debora Di Gioacchino & Paola Profeta, 2014. "Lobbying for Education in a Two-Sector Model," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 212-236, July.
    12. Günther G. Schulze & Bambang Suharnoko Sjahrir & Nikita Zakharov, 2016. "Corruption in Russia," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(1), pages 135-171.
    13. Rothbauer, Julia & Sieg, Gernot, 2011. "Welfare effects of public service broadcasting in a free-to-air TV market," MPRA Paper 33779, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Bruns, Christian, 2013. "Elections and Market Provision of Information," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79857, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    15. Ruben Enikolopov & Maria Petrova & Konstantin Sonin, 2018. "Social Media and Corruption," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 150-174, January.
    16. Kym Anderson, 2016. "Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-46925-0, July.
    17. Ansgar Belke & Niklas Potrafke, 2009. "Does Government Ideology Matter in Monetary Policy? – A Panel Data Analysis for OECD Countries," Ruhr Economic Papers 0094, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    18. Daron Acemoglu & Tarek A. Hassan & Ahmed Tahoun, 2018. "The Power of the Street: Evidence from Egypt’s Arab Spring," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(1), pages 1-42.
    19. Martinez-Bravo, Monica & Padro, Gerard & Qian, Nancy & Yao, Yang, 2012. "The Effects of Democratization on Public Goods and Redistribution: Evidence from China," CEPR Discussion Papers 8975, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Christian Bjørnskov & Niklas Potrafke, 2012. "Political Ideology and Economic Freedom Across Canadian Provinces," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 38(2), pages 143-166.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dip:dpaper:2013-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Research Publications Librarian). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.