IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12897.html

Alternative Insurance: Gig Work and Social Insurance Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Ngoc Dao
  • Riley Wilson

Abstract

Flexible gig opportunities provide a new means for workers to self-insure against negative economic shocks. Exploiting the roll-out of Uber, we use difference-in-differences, staggered treatment timing methods, and a survey experiment to show that access to flexible gig arrangements reduces participation in public assistance programs like Social Security Disability Insurance, Supplemental Security Income, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. To some extent, this new private self-insurance crowds-out traditional social insurance. However, the effect of gig opportunity access on program participation is attenuated in weak local labor markets, meaning gig work does not replace social programs when insuring against aggregate, macroeconomic risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngoc Dao & Riley Wilson, 2026. "Alternative Insurance: Gig Work and Social Insurance Participation," CESifo Working Paper Series 12897, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12897.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    2. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    3. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultfœuille, 2020. "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2964-2996, September.
    4. Andrew Garin & Emilie Jackson & Dmitri K. Koustas & Alicia Miller, 2023. "The Evolution of Platform Gig Work, 2012-2021," NBER Working Papers 31273, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Bruce D. Meyer & Nikolas Mittag, 2019. "Using Linked Survey and Administrative Data to Better Measure Income: Implications for Poverty, Program Effectiveness, and Holes in the Safety Net," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 176-204, April.
    6. Katharine G. Abraham & John Haltiwanger & Kristin Sandusky & James Spletzer, 2019. "The Rise of the Gig Economy: Fact or Fiction?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 357-361, May.
    7. Katharine G. Abraham & John C. Haltiwanger & Kristin Sandusky & James R. Spletzer, 2017. "Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring and Accounting for Innovation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 257-298, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Gale, William G. & Holmes, Sarah E. & John, David C., 2020. "Retirement plans for contingent workers: issues and options," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 185-197, April.
    9. Bracha, Anat & Burke, Mary A., 2021. "How Big is the Gig? The Extensive Margin, The Intensive Margin, and The Hidden Margin," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Riley Wilson, 2026. "The Self-Employment Effects of the EITC in the Gig Economy," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(1), pages 107-136.
    11. Andrew Garin & Emilie Jackson & Dmitri Koustas, 2025. "New Gig Work or Changes in Reporting? Understanding Self-Employment Trends in Tax Data," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 236-270, July.
    12. Jonathan V. Hall & John J. Horton & Daniel T. Knoepfle, 2023. "Ride-Sharing Markets Re-Equilibrate," NBER Working Papers 30883, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Nathaniel Hendren & Ben Sprung-Keyser, 2020. "A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(3), pages 1209-1318.
    14. Manasi Deshpande & Yue Li, 2019. "Who Is Screened Out? Application Costs and the Targeting of Disability Programs," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 213-248, November.
    15. Abraham, Katharine G. & Hershbein, Brad & Houseman, Susan N., 2021. "Contract work at older ages," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 426-447, July.
    16. Maria Hameed Khan & Jannine Williams & Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes, 2024. "Caring in the Gig Economy: A Relational Perspective of Decent Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1107-1127, August.
    17. Sundararajan, Arun, 2016. "The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262034573, December.
    18. Hall, Jonathan D. & Palsson, Craig & Price, Joseph, 2018. "Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 36-50.
    19. Lawrence F. Katz & Alan B. Krueger, 2019. "The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 72(2), pages 382-416, March.
    20. Katharine G. Abraham & John C. Haltiwanger & Claire Hou & Kristin Sandusky & James R. Spletzer, 2021. "Reconciling Survey and Administrative Measures of Self-Employment," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(4), pages 825-860.
    21. Alexandre Mas & Amanda Pallais, 2017. "Valuing Alternative Work Arrangements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(12), pages 3722-3759, December.
    22. M. Keith Chen & Judith A. Chevalier & Peter E. Rossi & Emily Oehlsen, 2019. "The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2735-2794.
    23. Matthew S. Rutledge & Alice Zulkarnain & Sara Ellen King, 2019. "How Does Contingent Work Affect SSDI Benefits?," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2019-4, Center for Retirement Research.
    24. Nichols, Albert L & Zeckhauser, Richard J, 1982. "Targeting Transfers through Restrictions on Recipients," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(2), pages 372-377, May.
    25. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    26. Ni Huang & Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2020. "Unemployment and Worker Participation in the Gig Economy: Evidence from an Online Labor Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 431-448, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bas Scheer & Wiljan van den Berge & Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2022. "Alternative Work Arrangements and Worker Outcomes: Evidence from Payrolling," CPB Discussion Paper 435, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Lennon, Conor & Maclean, Johanna Catherine & Teltser, Keith, 2025. "Ridesharing and substance use disorder treatment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Joelle Abramowitz & Andrew Joung, 2026. "Opening the Black Box of Self-Employment: Identifying Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 79(3), pages 462-485, May.
    4. Zhang, Jian & Sun, Xuhong & Zhu, Xinyu & Kong, Dongmin, 2026. "Does uber affect crime? Evidence from U․S․," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    5. Omberg, Tucker, 2024. "The labor market impacts of ridesharing on American Cities," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Liu, Yi & Li, Yao & Pang, Jindong, 2025. "JUE insight: Do ride-sharing services cause urban air pollution?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    7. Han, Jeehoon & Wu, Derek, 2026. "Income vs. Asset Tests in the Safety Net: Impacts on Access, Targeting, and Costs in SNAP," IZA Discussion Papers 18712, IZA Network @ LISER.
    8. Cloud, Cannon & Heß, Simon & Kasinger, Johannes, 2023. "Shared e-scooter services and road safety: Evidence from six European countries," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Costa-Font, Joan & Raut, Nilesh, 2025. "Long-term care partnership effects on Medicaid and private insurance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127078, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Yuan, Gecheng & Lu, Weijie & Wu, Xinyi & Zhou, Li, 2025. "The gig economy and household financial vulnerability," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
    11. Brehm, Johannes & Pestel, Nico & Schaffner, Sandra & Schmitz, Laura, 2025. "From Low Emission Zone to academic track: Environmental policy effects on educational achievement in elementary school," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Timothy K. M. Beatty & Joakim A. Weill, 2024. "Social Security and High-Frequency Labor Supply: Evidence from Uber Drivers," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2024-079, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    13. Mark Kattenberg & Bas Scheer & Jurre Thiel, 2023. "Causal forests with fixed effects for treatment effect heterogeneity in difference-in-differences," CPB Discussion Paper 452, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    14. Antonin Bergeaud & Clément Malgouyres & Clément Mazet-Sonilhac & Sara Signorelli, 2025. "Technological Change and Domestic Outsourcing," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(4), pages 1135-1168.
    15. Li, Pei & Liu, Kaihao & Lu, Yi & Peng, Lu, 2025. "Organizing regulatory structure and local air quality: Evidence from the environmental vertical management reform in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 139-164.
    16. Chen, Jidong & Shi, Xinzheng & Zhang, Ming-ang & Zhang, Sihan, 2024. "Centralization of environmental administration and air pollution: Evidence from China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Robinson, Sarah & Tazhitdinova, Alisa, 2025. "One hundred years of U.S. state taxation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Castelnovo, Paolo & Clò, Stefano & Florio, Massimo, 2023. "A quasi-experimental design to assess the innovative impact of public procurement: An application to the Italian space industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    19. Byrski, Dennis & Wang, Lucy Xiaolu, 2025. "Marketing authorization and strategic patenting: Evidence from pharmaceuticals," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    20. Marianne Bitler & Jason Cook & Chloe N. East & Sonya R. Porter & Laura Tiehen, 2026. "The Intersection of Place and Need: How Lack of Enrollment Offices Deters Participation in the Safety Net," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(1), pages 239-271.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • G52 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Insurance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.