IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v79y2026i3p462-485.html

Opening the Black Box of Self-Employment: Identifying Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Joelle Abramowitz
  • Andrew Joung

Abstract

A substantial share of workers are self-employed, but there is a dearth of data on heterogeneity in these work arrangements. To address this gap, the authors identify the variety of self-employment work arrangements in novel data produced using machine learning, leveraging 2003–2019 Panel Study of Income Dynamics respondents’ narrative descriptions of their industry, type of work, and employer names. The authors examine trends in the prevalence and nature of these forms of self-employment, transitions across them, and who works in them. Findings show disparate trends in the prevalence of different work arrangements and in transitions across work arrangements that would otherwise be masked. Further results suggest that the informally self-employed are less likely to have business assets, engage in more routine and less abstract skills on their jobs, are less educated, are less likely to be male and non-Hispanic White, have less labor income, and have worse well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Joelle Abramowitz & Andrew Joung, 2026. "Opening the Black Box of Self-Employment: Identifying Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 79(3), pages 462-485, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:462-485
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939251411263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939251411263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939251411263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel Slemrod, 2016. "Caveats to the Research Use of Tax-Return Administrative Data," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 69(4), pages 1003-1020, December.
    2. Katharine G. Abraham & John C. Haltiwanger & Kristin Sandusky & James R. Spletzer, 2017. "Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring and Accounting for Innovation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 257-298, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Lawrence F. Katz & Alan B. Krueger, 2019. "Understanding Trends in Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States," NBER Working Papers 25425, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Jacob A. Mortenson & Andrew Whitten, 2020. "Bunching to Maximize Tax Credits: Evidence from Kinks in the US Tax Schedule," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 402-432, August.
    5. David H. Autor & David Dorn, 2013. "The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1553-1597, August.
    6. Abraham, Katharine G. & Hershbein, Brad & Houseman, Susan N., 2021. "Contract work at older ages," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 426-447, July.
    7. Lawrence F. Katz & Alan B. Krueger, 2019. "The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 72(2), pages 382-416, March.
    8. Ross Levine & Yona Rubinstein, 2017. "Smart and Illicit: Who Becomes an Entrepreneur and Do They Earn More?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(2), pages 963-1018.
    9. Erik Hurst & Yona Rubinstein & Kazuatsu Shimizu, 2024. "Task-Based Discrimination," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(6), pages 1723-1768, June.
    10. Joelle Abramowitz, 2025. "Comparing Survey and Administrative Measures of Self-employment Income: New Implications from the Health and Retirement Study," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(1), pages 87-114.
    11. Abraham Katharine G. & Amaya Ashley, 2019. "Probing for Informal Work Activity," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(3), pages 487-508, September.
    12. Slemrod, Joel & Collins, Brett & Hoopes, Jeffrey L. & Reck, Daniel & Sebastiani, Michael, 2017. "Does credit-card information reporting improve small-business tax compliance?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-19.
    13. Emmanuel Saez, 2002. "Optimal Income Transfer Programs: Intensive versus Extensive Labor Supply Responses," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(3), pages 1039-1073.
    14. Andrew Garin & Emilie Jackson & Dmitri Koustas, 2025. "New Gig Work or Changes in Reporting? Understanding Self-Employment Trends in Tax Data," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 236-270, July.
    15. Audrey Light & Robert Munk, 2018. "Business Ownership versus Self†Employment," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 435-468, July.
    16. Katharine G. Abraham & Brad Hershbein & Susan N. Houseman & Beth C. Truesdale, 2024. "The Independent Contractor Workforce: New Evidence on Its Size and Composition and Ways to Improve Its Measurement in Household Surveys," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(3), pages 336-365, May.
    17. Katharine G. Abraham & John C. Haltiwanger & Claire Hou & Kristin Sandusky & James R. Spletzer, 2021. "Reconciling Survey and Administrative Measures of Self-Employment," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(4), pages 825-860.
    18. Tito Boeri & Giulia Giupponi & Alan B. Krueger & Stephen Machin, 2020. "Solo Self-Employment and Alternative Work Arrangements: A Cross-Country Perspective on the Changing Composition of Jobs," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 170-195, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joelle Abramowitz & Andrew Joung, 2025. "Understanding Self-Employment Trajectories over the Life Course in the United States," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Nature of Work, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Katharine G. Abraham & Brad Hershbein & Susan N. Houseman & Beth C. Truesdale, 2024. "The Independent Contractor Workforce: New Evidence on Its Size and Composition and Ways to Improve Its Measurement in Household Surveys," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(3), pages 336-365, May.
    3. Joelle Abramowitz, 2021. "What We Talk about When We Talk about Self-employment: Examining Self-employment and the Transition to Retirement among Older Adults in the United States," Working Papers wp423, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
    4. Tito Boeri & Giulia Giupponi & Alan B. Krueger & Stephen Machin, 2020. "Solo Self-Employment and Alternative Work Arrangements: A Cross-Country Perspective on the Changing Composition of Jobs," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 170-195, Winter.
    5. Can Ege & Fossen Frank M., 2026. "Income Taxation and Hours Worked in Different Types of Entrepreneurship," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 245-297.
    6. Bas Scheer & Wiljan van den Berge & Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2022. "Alternative Work Arrangements and Worker Outcomes: Evidence from Payrolling," CPB Discussion Paper 435, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    7. Mark Kattenberg & Bas Scheer & Jurre Thiel, 2023. "Causal forests with fixed effects for treatment effect heterogeneity in difference-in-differences," CPB Discussion Paper 452, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Ganserer, Angelika & Gregory, Terry & Zierahn-Weilage, Ulrich, 2022. "Minimum Wages and the Rise in Solo Self-Employment," IZA Discussion Papers 15283, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Belloc, Filippo & Burdin, Gabriel & Cattani, Luca & Ellis, William & Landini, Fabio, 2022. "Coevolution of job automation risk and workplace governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    10. Dmitri Koustas, 2020. "Insights from New Tax-Based Measures of Gig Work in the United States," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 21(03), pages 5-9, September.
    11. Lyu, Ke & Fossen, Frank M., 2025. "How Do Minimum Wages Affect Nonemployer Businesses in the United States?," IZA Discussion Papers 18101, IZA Network @ LISER.
    12. Lawrence F. Katz & Alan B. Krueger, 2019. "Understanding Trends in Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States," NBER Working Papers 25425, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Sargent, Kristina & Wang, Jue (Jessie), 2025. "A one way ticket to gig?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    14. Dolado, Juan J. & Jáñez, Álvaro & Wellschmied, Felix, 2025. "Riders on the Storm," IZA Discussion Papers 17740, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Rachel Marie Brooks Atkins & Quentin Brummet & Katie Johnson, 2025. "Understanding the Online Platform Based “Gig” Workforce in the US: Evidence from the Entrepreneurship in the Population Survey," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Nature of Work, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Bailey, Keith A. & Spletzer, James R., 2021. "A new measure of multiple jobholding in the U.S. economy," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Louis-Philippe Beland & Abel Brodeur & Taylor Wright, 2020. "COVID-19, Stay-at-Home Orders and Employment: Evidence from CPS Data," Carleton Economic Papers 20-04, Carleton University, Department of Economics, revised 19 May 2020.
    18. Joshua Greenstein, 2020. "The Precariat Class Structure and Income Inequality among US Workers: 1980–2018," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 447-469, September.
    19. Wei Yu & Seok-Woo Kwon & Kanwal Bokhari & Jia Bao, 2026. "Unseen strain: how entrepreneurial pursuits undermine spousal well-being," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 1183-1206, March.
    20. Sung‐Hee Jeon & Huju Liu & Yuri Ostrovsky, 2021. "Measuring the gig economy in Canada using administrative data," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 1638-1666, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:462-485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.