IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v94y2025ipbs1043951x25002391.html

The gig economy and household financial vulnerability

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Gecheng
  • Lu, Weijie
  • Wu, Xinyi
  • Zhou, Li

Abstract

Using a combination of manually collected data and the China Household Finance Survey from 2011 to 2019, we explore the effect of the gig economy on household financial vulnerability. To address endogeneity issues, we exploit the spatial and temporal variation in the presence of ride-hailing and food delivery services across Chinese cities. Employing a staggered difference-in-difference (DID) strategy, we find that the entry of gig platforms into a city is associated with a 5.97 % reduction in household financial vulnerability. This effect is more pronounced among households with lower wealth levels, lower female employment ratios, lower educational levels, as well as among households in poorer regions and areas with higher unemployment rates. To shed light on the mechanisms, we provide evidence that the entry of gig platforms provides households with additional income sources, reduces their liquidity constraints, and improves entrepreneurial quality. Our study contributes to the literature by highlighting the potential of the gig economy to serve as a buffer against financial instability, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Gecheng & Lu, Weijie & Wu, Xinyi & Zhou, Li, 2025. "The gig economy and household financial vulnerability," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:94:y:2025:i:pb:s1043951x25002391
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25002391
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Keith Chen & Judith A. Chevalier & Peter E. Rossi & Emily Oehlsen, 2019. "The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2735-2794.
    2. Michael L. Anderson & Lucas W. Davis, 2021. "Uber and Alcohol-Related Traffic Fatalities," NBER Working Papers 29071, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Hanming Fang & Ming Li & Zenan Wu & Yapei Zhang, 2023. "Reluctant Entrepreneurs: Evidence from China’s SOE Reform," PIER Working Paper Archive 23-014, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    4. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    5. Mi Diao & Hui Kong & Jinhua Zhao, 2021. "Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 494-500, June.
    6. Franziska Sohns & Javier Revilla Diez, 2018. "Explaining micro entrepreneurship in rural Vietnam—a multilevel analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 219-237, January.
    7. Jiyong Park & Min-Seok Pang & Junetae Kim & Byungtae Lee, 2021. "The Deterrent Effect of Ride-Sharing on Sexual Assault and Investigation of Situational Contingencies," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 497-516, June.
    8. Zhou, You, 2020. "Ride-sharing, alcohol consumption, and drunk driving," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Tullio Jappelli & Luigi Pistaferri, 2010. "The Consumption Response to Income Changes," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 479-506, September.
    10. Teltser, Keith & Lennon, Conor & Burgdorf, Jacob, 2021. "Do ridesharing services increase alcohol consumption?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Leon Moskatel & David Slusky, 2019. "Did UberX reduce ambulance volume?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(7), pages 817-829, July.
    12. Matthew R. Denes & Spyridon Lagaras & Margarita Tsoutsoura, 2025. "Entrepreneurship and the Gig Economy: Evidence from U.S. Tax Returns," NBER Working Papers 33347, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Liu, Taixing & Fan, Miaomiao & Li, Youwei & Yue, Pengpeng, 2024. "Financial literacy and household financial resilience," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Atif Mian & Amir Sufi & Emil Verner, 2017. "Household Debt and Business Cycles Worldwide," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1755-1817.
    15. Gordon Burtch & Seth Carnahan & Brad N. Greenwood, 2018. "Can You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(12), pages 5497-5520, December.
    16. Jeppe Druedahl & Thomas H Jørgensen, 2020. "Can Consumers Distinguish Persistent from Transitory Income Shocks?," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(632), pages 2410-2437.
    17. Luigi Pistaferri, 2001. "Superior Information, Income Shocks, And The Permanent Income Hypothesis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(3), pages 465-476, August.
    18. Cody Cook & Rebecca Diamond & Jonathan V Hall & John A List & Paul Oyer, 2021. "The Gender Earnings Gap in the Gig Economy: Evidence from over a Million Rideshare Drivers [Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2210-2238.
    19. Ampudia, Miguel & van Vlokhoven, Has & Żochowski, Dawid, 2016. "Financial fragility of euro area households," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 250-262.
    20. Ethan Ligon & Laura Schechter, 2003. "Measuring Vulnerability," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(486), pages 95-102, March.
    21. Ni Huang & Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2020. "Unemployment and Worker Participation in the Gig Economy: Evidence from an Online Labor Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 431-448, June.
    22. Joseph Gyourko & Joseph Tracy, 2006. "Using Home Maintenance and Repairs to Smooth Variable Earnings," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(4), pages 736-747, November.
    23. Barrios, John M. & Hochberg, Yael V. & Yi, Hanyi, 2022. "Launching with a parachute: The gig economy and new business formation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 22-43.
    24. Kræn Blume & Mette Ejrnæs & Helena Nielsen & Allan Würtz, 2009. "Labor market transitions of immigrants with emphasis on marginalization and self-employment," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 881-908, October.
    25. Wenchao Li & Changcheng Song & Shu Xu & Junjian Yi, 2022. "High Sex Ratios and Household Portfolio Choice in China," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(2), pages 465-490.
    26. Alessandra Luzzi & Amir Sasson, 2016. "Individual Entrepreneurial Exit and Earnings in Subsequent Paid Employment," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(2), pages 401-420, March.
    27. Marloes de Graaf-Zijl & Gerard van den Berg & Arjan Heyma, 2011. "Stepping stones for the unemployed: the effect of temporary jobs on the duration until (regular) work," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 107-139, January.
    28. Dmitri K. Koustas, 2019. "What Do Big Data Tell Us about Why People Take Gig Economy Jobs?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 367-371, May.
    29. Chen, Yutong, 2024. "Does the gig economy discriminate against women? Evidence from physicians in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    30. Denes, Matthew & Lagaras, Spyridon & Tsoutsoura, Margarita, 2025. "Entrepreneurship and the gig economy: Evidence from U.S. tax returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    31. Wu, Kai & Wan, Shijia, 2023. "Job stability and household financial vulnerability: Evidence from field surveys in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    32. Hanming Fang & Ming Li & Zenan Wu & Yapei Zhang, 2023. "Reluctant Entrepreneurs: Evidence from China’s SOE Reform," NBER Working Papers 31700, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    33. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    34. Peter Cohen & Robert Hahn & Jonathan Hall & Steven Levitt & Robert Metcalfe, 2016. "Using Big Data to Estimate Consumer Surplus: The Case of Uber," NBER Working Papers 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongwook Paik & Christos A. Makridis, 2023. "The social value of a ridesharing platform: a hedonic pricing approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 2125-2150, May.
    2. Teltser, Keith & Lennon, Conor & Burgdorf, Jacob, 2021. "Do ridesharing services increase alcohol consumption?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Lennon, Conor & Maclean, Johanna Catherine & Teltser, Keith, 2025. "Ridesharing and substance use disorder treatment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. John M. Barrios & Yael Hochberg & Hanyi Yi, 2020. "The Cost of Convenience: Ridehailing and Traffic Fatalities," NBER Working Papers 26783, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Huang, Ganxiang & Wang, Hongyan & Zhang, Liuqin & Xu, Di, 2026. "The impact of ride-hailing regulations on traffic congestion: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Guo, Xue & Cheng, Aaron & Pavlou, Paul A., 2025. "Skill-biased technical change, again? Online gig platforms and local employment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124538, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Saharsh Agarwal & Deepa Mani & Rahul Telang, 2023. "The Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Congestion: Evidence from Indian Cities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 862-883, May.
    8. Sumit Agarwal & Shashwat Alok & Sergio Correia & Deepa Mani & Bernardo Morais, 2024. "Transportation Technology and Gentrification: Evidence from the entry of Ridesharing Services," Papers 2409.15462, arXiv.org.
    9. Rubing Li & Xiao Liu & Arun Sundararajan, 2025. "Platform Design, Earnings Transparency and Minimum Wage Policies: Evidence from A Natural Experiment on Lyft," Working Papers 25-09, NET Institute.
    10. Conor Lennon & Johanna Catherine Maclean & Keith F. Teltser, 2024. "Ridesharing and Substance Use Disorder Treatment," NBER Working Papers 33077, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Sitong Pan & Qinghua Shi & Yue Zhang, 2025. "Platform economy and missing entrepreneurship: Evidence from E‐commerce development policy in China," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 209-251, April.
    12. Yi Liu & Bowen Lou & Xinyi Zhao & Xinxin Li, 2024. "Unintended Consequences of Advances in Matching Technologies: Information Revelation and Strategic Participation on Gig-Economy Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1729-1754, March.
    13. Fos, Vyacheslav & Hamdi, Naser & Kalda, Ankit & Nickerson, Jordan, 2025. "Gig labor: Trading safety nets for steering wheels," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Philip Wollborn & David Dornekott & Ulrike Holder, 2023. "Entrepreneurial efforts and opportunity costs: evidence from twitch streamers," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1209-1238, September.
    15. Mosquera, Roberto, 2024. "Stuck in traffic: Measuring congestion externalities with negative supply shocks," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Tarduno, Matthew, 2025. "Elasticities and tax incidence in urban ridesharing markets: Evidence from Chicago," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Barrios, John M. & Hochberg, Yael V. & Yi, Hanyi, 2022. "Launching with a parachute: The gig economy and new business formation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 22-43.
    18. Gorkem Turgut Ozer & Brad N. Greenwood & Anandasivam Gopal, 2024. "Noisebnb: An Empirical Analysis of Home-Sharing Platforms and Residential Noise Complaints," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1824-1847, December.
    19. Cookson, J. Anthony & Gilje, Erik P. & Heimer, Rawley Z., 2022. "Shale shocked: Cash windfalls and household debt repayment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 905-931.
    20. Oliver Alexander & Jeff Borland & Andrew Charlton & Amit Singh, 2022. "The Labour Market for Uber Drivers in Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(2), pages 177-194, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:94:y:2025:i:pb:s1043951x25002391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.