IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v203y2026ics0965856425003982.html

The impact of ride-hailing regulations on traffic congestion: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Ganxiang
  • Wang, Hongyan
  • Zhang, Liuqin
  • Xu, Di

Abstract

Despite theoretical controversies, many city governments have begun to regulate ride-hailing services in response to concerns that their rapid growth could worsen traffic congestion. However, the precise impact of these regulatory measures on traffic congestion remains unclear. To address this research gap, we utilized a quasi-natural experiment involving the phased implementation of regulatory policies restricting the supply of ride-hailing services in various cities across China to identify the causal effect of ride-hailing regulations on traffic congestion. Using monthly panel data from 98 Chinese cities, our difference-in-differences estimation shows that the congestion delay index decreased by an average of 2.4% after the implementation of ride-hailing regulations. This finding remains consistent and robust across a series of robustness checks. Furthermore, our heterogeneity analysis indicates that the congestion mitigation effect of ride-hailing regulations varies depending on the types and intensities of regulations implemented, and that this effect is stronger in central cities with larger populations, more developed public transportation systems, and higher levels of congestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Ganxiang & Wang, Hongyan & Zhang, Liuqin & Xu, Di, 2026. "The impact of ride-hailing regulations on traffic congestion: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003982
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003982
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.