IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i3p862-883.html

The Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Congestion: Evidence from Indian Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Saharsh Agarwal

    (Indian School of Business, Hyderabad, Telangana 500111, India)

  • Deepa Mani

    (Indian School of Business, Hyderabad, Telangana 500111, India)

  • Rahul Telang

    (Heinz College, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

Abstract

Problem definition : Early research has documented significant growth in ride-hailing services worldwide and allied benefits. However, growing evidence of their negative externalities is leading to significant policy scrutiny. Despite demonstrated socioeconomic benefits and consumer surplus worth billions of dollars, cities are choosing to curb these services in a bid to mitigate first order urban mobility problems. Existing studies on the congestion effects of ride-hailing are limited, report mixed evidence, and exclusively focus on the United States, where the supply consists primarily of part-time drivers. Methodology/results : We study how the absence of ride-hailing services affects congestion levels in three major cities in India, a market where most ride-hailing drivers participate full time. Using rich real-time traffic and route trajectory data from Google Maps, we show that in, all three cities, periods of ride-hailing unavailability due to driver strikes see a discernible drop in travel time. The effects are largest for the most congested regions during the busiest hours, which see 10.1%–14.8% reduction in travel times. Additionally, we provide suggestive evidence for some of the mechanisms behind the observed effects, including deadheading elimination, substitution with public transit, and opening up of shorter alternative routes. Managerial implications : These results suggest that despite their paltry modal share, ride-hailing vehicles are substituting more sustainable means of transport and are contributing significantly to congestion in the cities studied. The reported effect sizes quantify the maximum travel time gains that can be expected on curbing them.

Suggested Citation

  • Saharsh Agarwal & Deepa Mani & Rahul Telang, 2023. "The Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Congestion: Evidence from Indian Cities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 862-883, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:3:p:862-883
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1158
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Keith Chen & Judith A. Chevalier & Peter E. Rossi & Emily Oehlsen, 2019. "The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2735-2794.
    2. Gérard P. Cachon & Kaitlin M. Daniels & Ruben Lobel, 2017. "The Role of Surge Pricing on a Service Platform with Self-Scheduling Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 368-384, July.
    3. Harish Guda & Upender Subramanian, 2019. "Your Uber Is Arriving: Managing On-Demand Workers Through Surge Pricing, Forecast Communication, and Worker Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1995-2014, May.
    4. Jiaru Bai & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang & Xiqun (Michael) Chen & Hai Wang, 2019. "Coordinating Supply and Demand on an On-Demand Service Platform with Impatient Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 556-570, July.
    5. A. Colin Cameron & Jonah B. Gelbach & Douglas L. Miller, 2011. "Robust Inference With Multiway Clustering," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 238-249, April.
    6. Guiyun Feng & Guangwen Kong & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "We Are on the Way: Analysis of On-Demand Ride-Hailing Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1237-1256, September.
    7. Judd Cramer & Alan B. Krueger, 2016. "Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 177-182, May.
    8. Lin Tian & Baojun Jiang & Yifan Xu, 2021. "Manufacturer’s Entry in the Product-Sharing Market," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 553-568, May.
    9. Tarduno, Matthew, 2021. "The congestion costs of Uber and Lyft," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    10. Michael L. Anderson, 2014. "Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(9), pages 2763-2796, September.
    11. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Jose A. Guajardo & Zhe Zhang, 2021. "Business Models in the Sharing Economy: Manufacturing Durable Goods in the Presence of Peer-to-Peer Rental Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1450-1469, December.
    12. Kostas Bimpikis & Ozan Candogan & Daniela Saban, 2019. "Spatial Pricing in Ride-Sharing Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 744-769, May.
    13. Gordon Burtch & Seth Carnahan & Brad N. Greenwood, 2018. "Can You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(12), pages 5497-5520, December.
    14. Christian Terwiesch & Marcelo Olivares & Bradley R. Staats & Vishal Gaur, 2020. "OM Forum—A Review of Empirical Operations Management over the Last Two Decades," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 656-668, July.
    15. Mohammad Akbarpour & Shengwu Li & Shayan Oveis Gharan, 2020. "Thickness and Information in Dynamic Matching Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(3), pages 783-815.
    16. Meng Liu & Erik Brynjolfsson & Jason Dowlatabadi, 2021. "Do Digital Platforms Reduce Moral Hazard? The Case of Uber and Taxis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4665-4685, August.
    17. Mi Diao & Hui Kong & Jinhua Zhao, 2021. "Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 494-500, June.
    18. Marshall Fisher & Marcelo Olivares & Bradley R. Staats, 2020. "Why Empirical Research Is Good for Operations Management, and What Is Good Empirical Operations Management?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 170-178, January.
    19. Saif Benjaafar & Guangwen Kong & Xiang Li & Costas Courcoubetis, 2019. "Peer-to-Peer Product Sharing: Implications for Ownership, Usage, and Social Welfare in the Sharing Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 477-493, February.
    20. Alejandro Tirachini, 2020. "Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2011-2047, August.
    21. Alejandro Henao & Wesley E. Marshall, 2019. "The impact of ride-hailing on vehicle miles traveled," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2173-2194, December.
    22. Saif Benjaafar & Ming Hu, 2020. "Operations Management in the Age of the Sharing Economy: What Is Old and What Is New?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 93-101, January.
    23. Hall, Jonathan D. & Palsson, Craig & Price, Joseph, 2018. "Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 36-50.
    24. Saif Benjaafar & Harald Bernhard & Costas Courcoubetis & Michail Kanakakis & Spyridon Papafragkos, 2022. "Drivers, Riders, and Service Providers: The Impact of the Sharing Economy on Mobility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 123-142, January.
    25. Jiayi Joey Yu & Christopher S. Tang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Xiqun Michael Chen, 2020. "A Balancing Act of Regulating On-Demand Ride Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2975-2992, July.
    26. Omar Besbes & Francisco Castro & Ilan Lobel, 2021. "Surge Pricing and Its Spatial Supply Response," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1350-1367, March.
    27. Peter Cohen & Robert Hahn & Jonathan Hall & Steven Levitt & Robert Metcalfe, 2016. "Using Big Data to Estimate Consumer Surplus: The Case of Uber," NBER Working Papers 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    28. Agatz, Niels & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin & Wang, Xing, 2012. "Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 295-303.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Ganxiang & Wang, Hongyan & Zhang, Liuqin & Xu, Di, 2026. "The impact of ride-hailing regulations on traffic congestion: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Jiayang Li & Guoyin Zhang & Debing Ni, 2025. "Drivers’ Welfare and Pollutant Emission Induced by Ride-Hailing Platforms’ Pricing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-35, April.
    3. Coppola, Antonio & Hiermann, Gerhard & Paccagnan, Dario & Schiffer, Maximilian, 2025. "Staggered routing in autonomous mobility-on-demand systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(3), pages 875-891.
    4. Evangelos Katsamakas & J. Manuel Sanchez-Cartas, 2025. "Congestion, network effects and platform competition," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 20(2), pages 451-475, April.
    5. Bibaswan Basu & M. P. Sebastian & Arpan Kumar Kar, 2025. "What Affects User Experience of Shared Mobility Services? Insights from Integrating Signaling Theory and Value Framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1789-1811, October.
    6. Xu, Weiping & Gu, Tianqi & Chung, Hyungchul & Jiang, Zhuonan & Li, Han & Huang, Kai & Zhu, Wenbo, 2025. "The multimodal dynamics of “ride-pooling” and metro: Spatial-temporal patterns from East Asia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Xiaohui Liu & Sean Qian & Hock-Hai Teo & Wei Ma, 2024. "Estimating and Mitigating the Congestion Effect of Curbside Pick-ups and Drop-Offs: A Causal Inference Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 355-376, March.
    8. Deng, Yao & Li, Zhi-Chun & Qian, Sean & Ma, Wei, 2025. "Modeling the curbside congestion effects of ride-hailing services for morning commute using bi-modal two-tandem bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Hoang-Tung, Nguyen & Linh, Hoang Thuy & Tan, Nguyen Viet & Kato, Hironori, 2025. "Traffic congestion and ride-hailing booking: Evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Gong & Brad N. Greenwood & Yiping (Amy) Song, 2023. "An Empirical Investigation of Ridesharing and New Vehicle Purchase," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 884-902, May.
    2. Wang, Hai & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-155.
    3. Hu, Xinru & Zhou, Shuiyin & Luo, Xiaomeng & Li, Jianbin & Zhang, Chi, 2024. "Optimal pricing strategy of an on-demand platform with cross-regional passengers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Liu Ming & Tunay Tunca & Yi Xu & Weiming Zhu, 2025. "Market Formation, Pricing, and Value Generation in Ride-Hailing Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1551-1570, September.
    5. Suvrat Dhanorkar & Gordon Burtch, 2022. "The Heterogeneous Effects of P2P Ride-Hailing on Traffic: Evidence from Uber’s Entry in California," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 750-774, May.
    6. Chen, Mingyang & Zhao, Daozhi & Gong, Yeming & Rekik, Yacine, 2022. "An on-demand service platform with self-scheduling capacity: Uniform versus multiplier-based pricing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    7. Yang, Jie & Zhao, Daozhi & Wang, Zeyu & Xu, Chunqiu, 2022. "Impact of regulation on on-demand ride-sharing service: Profit-based target vs demand-based target," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Yunke Mai & Bin Hu & Saša Pekeč, 2023. "Courteous or Crude? Managing User Conduct to Improve On-Demand Service Platform Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 996-1016, February.
    9. Zenan Zhou & Xiang Wan, 2022. "Does the Sharing Economy Technology Disrupt Incumbents? Exploring the Influences of Mobile Digital Freight Matching Platforms on Road Freight Logistics Firms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 117-137, January.
    10. Yixuan Liu & Xiaofang Wang & Stephen Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2023. "On the Participation, Competition and Welfare at Customer-Intensive Discretionary Service Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 218-234, January.
    11. Yongwook Paik & Christos A. Makridis, 2023. "The social value of a ridesharing platform: a hedonic pricing approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 2125-2150, May.
    12. Fayed, Lynn & Nilsson, Gustav & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "On the utilization of dedicated bus lanes for pooled ride-hailing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 29-52.
    13. Yoshifumi Konishi & Akari Ono, 2024. "Is Ride-sharing Good for Environment?," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2024-014, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    14. Apostolos Filippas & Srikanth Jagabathula & Arun Sundararajan, 2023. "The Limits of Centralized Pricing in Online Marketplaces and the Value of User Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7202-7216, December.
    15. Lin Tian & Baojun Jiang & Yifan Xu, 2021. "Manufacturer’s Entry in the Product-Sharing Market," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 553-568, May.
    16. Jaelynn Oh & Chloe Kim Glaeser & Xuanming Su, 2026. "Food Ordering and Delivery: How Platforms and Restaurants Should Split the Pie," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1748-1768, March.
    17. Yingjie Zhang & Beibei Li & Sean Qian, 2023. "Ridesharing and Digital Resilience for Urban Anomalies: Evidence from the New York City Taxi Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1775-1790, December.
    18. Soheil Ghili & Vineet Kumar, 2021. "Spatial Distribution of Supply and the Role of Market Thickness: Theory and Evidence from Ride Sharing," Papers 2108.05954, arXiv.org.
    19. Yang Pan & Liangfei Qiu, 2022. "How Ride‐Sharing Is Shaping Public Transit System: A Counterfactual Estimator Approach," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 906-927, March.
    20. Lam, Chungsang Tom & Liu, Meng & Hui, Xiang, 2021. "The geography of ridesharing: A case study on New York City," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:3:p:862-883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.