IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Conocimiento, geografía e instituciones: Una aproximación a la problemática del crecimiento en el archipiélago canario

  • Jacinto Brito González

    ()

    (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; Facultad de Ciencias Eonómicas y Empresariales; Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado; C/ Saulo Torón 4, 35017 Las Palmas de G.C. España)

Registered author(s):

    Se efectúa, inicialmente, un sucinto recorrido por algunos hitos teóricos de la literatura económica reciente que se consideran más significativos desde el punto de vista del análisis de la relevancia de la producción y circulación del conocimiento para el desarrollo económico, de la lógica de la localización espacial de las actividades productivas, y del papel de las instituciones y de la geografía física en el crecimiento económico. Subraya la importancia de los sistemas regionales como ejes de atracción o de rechazo para el emplazamiento de las actividades económicas, y de la predominancia de los procesos ligados al conocimiento a la hora de determinar la naturaleza de la localización económica que tiene cabida en los mismos. Asimismo, da cuenta del reciente debate habido respecto a la importancia de los factores geográficos e institucionales a la hora de explicar los problemas del crecimiento económico, haciendo hincapié en el dominio que se viene otorgando a estos últimos. A partir de estos presupuestos generales se efectúa una aproximación a la problemática del crecimiento en las Islas Canarias. Para ello establece una serie de hipótesis valorativas que intentan caracterizar la evolución histórica de la posición de Canarias en el contexto de los flujos económicos internacionales, las limitaciones intrínsecas de sus actividades productivas desde el punto de vista del crecimiento, los estrangulamientos derivados de las instituciones formales e informales imperantes, y algunas deficiencias en la orientación de las actuales políticas públicas. Finalmente, se esbozan ciertos criterios generales que debieran inspirar las políticas públicas y las estrategias privadas con el fin de estimular el crecimiento económico en consonancia con las potencialidades y las restricciones derivadas de la actual etapa de la economía mundial.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.bibliotecas.ulpgc.es/fcee/hemeroteca/documentos%20de%20trabajo/DocumentosDTrabajo/doc36/dt2004-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la ULPGC in its series Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC with number 2004-03.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 43 pages
    Date of creation: Mar 2004
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:can:series:2004-03
    Contact details of provider:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    2. Edward E Leamer & Michael Storper, 2001. "The Economic Geography of the Internet Age," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(4), pages 641-665, December.
    3. Pranab Bardhan., 1996. "The Nature of Institutional Impediments to Economic Development," Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers C96-066, University of California at Berkeley.
    4. Pranab Bardhan, 2002. "Decentralization of Governance and Development," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 185-205, Fall.
    5. Arrow, Kenneth J, 1994. "Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 1-9, May.
    6. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2001. "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1369-1401, December.
    8. Wacziarg, Romain & Spolaore, Enrico & Alesina, Alberto, 2000. "Economic Integration and Political Disintegration," Scholarly Articles 4553029, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    9. D. Colander., 2009. "The Complexity Revolution and the Future of Economics," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 1.
    10. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2002. "Reversal Of Fortune: Geography And Institutions In The Making Of The Modern World Income Distribution," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 117(4), pages 1231-1294, November.
    11. Alberto Alesina & Roberto Perotti, 1994. "The Political Economy of Budget Deficits," NBER Working Papers 4637, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. J. Vernon Henderson, Zmarak Shalizi, and Anthony J. Venables, 2001. "Geography and development," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 81-105, January.
    13. Acemoglu, Daron & Johnson, Simon & Robinson, James A, 2002. "An African Success Story: Botswana," CEPR Discussion Papers 3219, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Andrew F. Haughwout, 2001. "Infrastructure and social welfare in metropolitan America," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Dec, pages 1-16.
    15. Audretsch, David B & Thurik, A Roy, 2001. "What's New about the New Economy?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 267-315, March.
    16. Easterly, William & Kraay, Aart, 1999. "Small states, small problems?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2139, The World Bank.
    17. Lederman, Daniel & Loayza, Norman & Reis Soares, Rodrigo, 2001. "Accountability and corruption : political institutions matter," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2708, The World Bank.
    18. Islam, Roumeen & Montenegro, Claudio E., 2002. "What determines the quality of institutions?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2764, The World Bank.
    19. Rodrigo Arocena & Judith Sutz, 2000. "Interactive Learning Spaces and Development Policies in Latin America," DRUID Working Papers 00-13, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:can:series:2004-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Patricia Santana)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.