IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bis/bismcp/11.html

Large central bank balance sheets and market functioning

Author

Listed:
  • Bank for International Settlements

Abstract

Central banks expanded their balance sheets on an unprecedented scale in response to the global financial crisis and its aftermath. The scale of these programmes naturally gave rise to concerns about their impact on market functioning, prompting central banks to take steps to mitigate any potential adverse consequences. This report prepared by a Markets Committee study group reviews the accumulated experience and associated policy implications. It investigates how the design and execution of balance sheet expansion affected market functioning and, in particular, to what extent it affected how market participants could adjust their positions efficiently, and whether asset prices responded to information promptly and reliably. The report complements a parallel study by the Committee on the Global Financial System, which reviews more broadly the effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy tools and the lessons central banks have drawn from their use. The Markets Committee report notes that some balance sheet-expanding policies were specifically aimed at improving market functioning, and that they delivered on this front. The potential for adverse side effects arose most clearly at a later stage, when asset purchase programmes were introduced to provide monetary stimulus at the effective lower bound for interest rates. But side effects rarely tightened financial conditions in markets to a point that would have undermined policy effectiveness. That said, the report finds that some market malfunctioning did arise. In bond markets, adverse effects were mostly associated with asset scarcity, but any such effects were often temporary, in part due to mitigating policies. In money markets, market functioning issues (for example in interbank reserve trading) arose from the abundance of reserves. Yet, other wholesale money markets remained robust and central banks retained sufficient control over short-term rates, typically by introducing new tools. The report acknowledges that prolonged use of large balance sheet policies may have longer-term adverse effects on the market ecosystem, but these are hard to measure at this point. From the experiences analysed in this report, the report has distilled a set of lessons and best practices. These lessons can help to inform central bankers in minimising negative impacts on market functioning should there ever be a future need to pursue large-scale balance sheet expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Bank for International Settlements, 2019. "Large central bank balance sheets and market functioning," Markets Committee Papers 11, Bank for International Settlements.
  • Handle: RePEc:bis:bismcp:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/mktc11.pdf
    File Function: Full PDF document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/mktc11.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berentsen, Aleksander & Kraenzlin, Sébastien & Müller, Benjamin, 2018. "Exit strategies for monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 20-40.
    2. Kandrac, John & Schlusche, Bernd, 2013. "Flow effects of large-scale asset purchases," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 330-335.
    3. Erik Vogt & Michael Fleming & Or Shachar & Tobias Adrian, 2017. "Market Liquidity After the Financial Crisis," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 43-83, November.
    4. Mr. Manmohan Singh, 2013. "Collateral and Monetary Policy," IMF Working Papers 2013/186, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Bindseil, Ulrich, 2013. "Central bank collateral, asset fire sales, regulation and liquidity," Working Paper Series 1610, European Central Bank.
    6. Gita Gopinath & Jeremy C Stein, 2021. "Banking, Trade, and the Making of a Dominant Currency," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(2), pages 783-830.
    7. Amihud, Yakov, 2002. "Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 31-56, January.
    8. Malamud, Semyon & Eren, Egemen, 2018. "Dominant Currency Debt," CEPR Discussion Papers 13391, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Shane A. Corwin & Paul Schultz, 2012. "A Simple Way to Estimate Bid‐Ask Spreads from Daily High and Low Prices," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(2), pages 719-760, April.
    10. Dagfinn Rime & Andreas Schrimpf & Olav Syrstad, 2017. "Segmented money markets and covered interest parity arbitrage," BIS Working Papers 651, Bank for International Settlements.
    11. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:1:p:1-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Daniel Kohler & Benjamin Müller, 2019. "Covered interest rate parity, relative funding liquidity and cross-currency repos," Working Papers 2019-05, Swiss National Bank.
    13. Adrian, Tobias & Crump, Richard K. & Moench, Emanuel, 2013. "Pricing the term structure with linear regressions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 110-138.
    14. D’Amico, Stefania & King, Thomas B., 2013. "Flow and stock effects of large-scale treasury purchases: Evidence on the importance of local supply," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 425-448.
    15. Morten Linnemann Bech & Umar Faruqui & Frederik Ougaard & Cristina Picillo, 2018. "Payments are a-changin' but cash still rules," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, March.
    16. D’Amico, Stefania & Fan, Roger & Kitsul, Yuriy, 2018. "The Scarcity Value of Treasury Collateral: Repo-Market Effects of Security-Specific Supply and Demand Factors," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(5), pages 2103-2129, October.
    17. Mr. Murtaza H Syed & Hiromi Yamaoka, 2010. "Managing the Exit: Lessons from Japan's Reversal of Unconventional Monetary Policy," IMF Working Papers 2010/114, International Monetary Fund.
    18. Claudio Borio & Robert Neil McCauley & Patrick McGuire & Vladyslav Sushko, 2016. "Covered interest parity lost: understanding the cross-currency basis," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, September.
    19. Paul Schultz, 2001. "Corporate Bond Trading Costs: A Peek Behind the Curtain," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(2), pages 677-698, April.
    20. Kenneth D. Garbade & Frank M. Keane & Lorie Logan & Amanda Stokes & Jennifer Wolgemuth, 2010. "The introduction of the TMPG fails charge for U.S. Treasury securities," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 16(Oct), pages 45-71.
    21. Mr. Fei Han & Dulani Seneviratne, 2018. "Scarcity Effects of Quantitative Easing on Market Liquidity: Evidence from the Japanese Government Bond Market," IMF Working Papers 2018/096, International Monetary Fund.
    22. Pastor, Lubos & Stambaugh, Robert F., 2003. "Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(3), pages 642-685, June.
    23. Roll, Richard, 1984. "A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(4), pages 1127-1139, September.
    24. Hancock, Diana & Passmore, Wayne, 2011. "Did the Federal Reserve's MBS purchase program lower mortgage rates?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 498-514.
    25. Iñaki Aldasoro & Torsten Ehlers & Egemen Eren, 2018. "Business models and dollar funding of global banks," BIS Working Papers 708, Bank for International Settlements.
    26. Kolasa, Marcin & Wesołowski, Grzegorz, 2020. "International spillovers of quantitative easing," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    27. Martijn Boermans & Viacheslav Keshkov, 2018. "The impact of the ECB asset purchases on the European bond market structure: Granular evidence on ownership concentration," DNB Working Papers 590, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    28. Fuhrer, Lucas Marc, 2018. "Liquidity in the repo market," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-22.
    29. Kentaro Iwatsubo & Tomoki Taishi, 2018. "Quantitative Easing and Liquidity in the Japanese Government Bond Market," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 463-475, September.
    30. De Pooter, Michiel & Martin, Robert F. & Pruitt, Seth, 2018. "The Liquidity Effects of Official Bond Market Intervention," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 243-268, February.
    31. Andreas Jobst & Ms. Huidan Huidan Lin, 2016. "Negative Interest Rate Policy (NIRP): Implications for Monetary Transmission and Bank Profitability in the Euro Area," IMF Working Papers 2016/172, International Monetary Fund.
    32. Wiliiam Arrata & Benoit Nguyen & Imene Rahmouni-Rousseau & Miklos Vari, 2017. "Eurosystem s asset purchases and money market rates," Working papers 652, Banque de France.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lena Boneva & David Elliott & Iryna Kaminska & Oliver Linton & Nick McLaren & Ben Morley, 2022. "The Impact of Corporate QE on Liquidity: Evidence from the UK," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(648), pages 2615-2643.
    2. Boneva, Lena & Islami, Mevlud & Schlepper, Kathi, 2024. "Liquidity in the German corporate bond market: Has the CSPP made a difference?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Sergey Chernenko & Adi Sunderam, 2020. "Measuring the Perceived Liquidity of the Corporate Bond Market," NBER Working Papers 27092, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Díaz, Antonio & Escribano, Ana, 2020. "Measuring the multi-faceted dimension of liquidity in financial markets: A literature review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Karstanje, Dennis & Sojli, Elvira & Tham, Wing Wah & van der Wel, Michel, 2013. "Economic valuation of liquidity timing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5073-5087.
    6. Hagströmer, Björn, 2021. "Bias in the effective bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 314-337.
    7. Goldstein, Michael A. & Namin, Elmira Shekari, 2023. "Corporate bond liquidity and yield spreads: A review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Abankwa, Samuel & Blenman, Lloyd P., 2021. "Measuring liquidity risk effects on carry trades across currencies and regimes," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Kim, Soon-Ho & Lee, Kuan-Hui, 2014. "Pricing of liquidity risks: Evidence from multiple liquidity measures," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 112-133.
    10. Diego Leal Gonzalez & Bryan Stanhouse & Duane Stock & Xin Yue Zhou, 2025. "Nonlinear structural estimation of corporate bond liquidity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 799-827, February.
    11. Broto, Carmen & Lamas, Matías, 2020. "Is market liquidity less resilient after the financial crisis? Evidence for US Treasuries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 217-229.
    12. Yin, Zhengnan & O’Sullivan, Niall & Sherman, Meadhbh, 2024. "The liquidity timing ability of mutual funds," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Qian, Meifen & Sun, Ping-Wen & Yu, Bin, 2017. "High turnover with high price delay? Dissecting the puzzling phenomenon for China's A-shares," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 105-113.
    14. Ayad Assoil & Ndéné Ka & Jules Sadefo-Kamdem, 2021. "Analysis of the dynamic relationship between liquidity proxies and returns on the French CAC 40 index," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Ernest N. Biktimirov & Yuanbin Xu, 2019. "Market reactions to changes in the Dow Jones industrial average index," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 792-812, May.
    16. Marshall, Ben R. & Nguyen, Nhut H. & Visaltanachoti, Nuttawat, 2018. "Do liquidity proxies measure liquidity accurately in ETFs?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 94-111.
    17. Nina Karnaukh & Angelo Ranaldo & Paul Söderlind, 2015. "Understanding FX Liquidity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(11), pages 3073-3108.
    18. Liu, Weimin & Luo, Di & Zhao, Huainan, 2016. "Transaction costs, liquidity risk, and the CCAPM," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 126-145.
    19. Yu, Bo & Dong, Liang & Qin, Zhenjiang & Lam, Keith S.K., 2025. "What is the best composite liquidity proxy for explaining stock returns? Evidence from the Chinese stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Alexander Dickerson & Cesare Robotti & Giulio Rossetti, 2026. "The Corporate Bond Factor Replication Crisis," Papers 2604.07880, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:bismcp:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Fessler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.