IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.23325.html

Happy Birthday? Age Labels, Search Criteria, and Matching from Dating to Marriage

Author

Listed:
  • Suguru Otani

Abstract

Age is a match trait and a prominent label on search platforms. Using confidential records from a large Japanese marriage platform, I study how a birthday age update affects consideration, applications, relationship progression, and engagement. Only displayed age updates at birthdays. Receivers enter some acceptable-age ranges as they exit others, leaving only modest overall eligibility changes. Application counts often increase. Applications shift from younger to older suitors. Proposal counts fall at nine of ten female receiver ages \(31\text{--}40\), with losses concentrated at entry into early dating. In stage-specific accounting for receivers in their thirties, the no-birthday proposal count is \(12.9\) percent above the benchmark for female receivers and \(6.7\) percent below it for male receivers; the younger-man share in the female-receiver channel is \(4.8\) percentage points higher. Age labels and filters are not neutral windows onto preferences: they govern who marries whom and how many marriages form.

Suggested Citation

  • Suguru Otani, 2026. "Happy Birthday? Age Labels, Search Criteria, and Matching from Dating to Marriage," Papers 2607.23325, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.23325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.23325
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene Choo & Aloysius Siow, 2006. "Who Marries Whom and Why," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(1), pages 175-201, February.
    2. Michèle Belot & Marco Francesconi, 2013. "Dating Preferences and Meeting Opportunities in Mate Choice Decisions," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 48(2), pages 474-508.
    3. Berkeren Büyükeren & Alexey Makarin & Heyu Xiong, 2026. "The Impact of Dating Apps on Young Adults: Evidence from Tinder," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 61-106, April.
    4. Andrew Shephard, 2019. "Marriage market dynamics, gender, and the age gap," PIER Working Paper Archive 19-003, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    5. Arnaud Dupuy & Alfred Galichon, 2014. "Personality Traits and the Marriage Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 122(6), pages 1271-1319.
    6. Edoardo Ciscato & Alfred Galichon & Marion Goussé, 2020. "Like Attract Like? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(2), pages 740-781.
    7. Saurabh Bhargava & Ray Fisman, 2014. "Contrast Effects in Sequential Decisions: Evidence from Speed Dating," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(3), pages 444-457, July.
    8. Christopher T. Stanton & Catherine Thomas, 2025. "Who Benefits from Online Gig Economy Platforms?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(6), pages 1857-1895, June.
    9. Michèle Belot & Philipp Kircher & Paul Muller, 2022. "How Wage Announcements Affect Job Search—A Field Experiment," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 1-67, October.
    10. Pierre-André Chiappori & Bernard Salanié & Yoram Weiss, 2017. "Partner Choice, Investment in Children, and the Marital College Premium," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(8), pages 2109-2167, August.
    11. Gunter J. Hitsch & Ali Hortaçsu & Dan Ariely, 2010. "Matching and Sorting in Online Dating," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 130-163, March.
    12. Soohyung Lee, 2016. "Effect of Online Dating on Assortative Mating: Evidence from South Korea," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 1120-1139, September.
    13. Kuan‐Ming Chen & Yu‐Wei Hsieh & Ming‐Jen Lin, 2023. "Reducing Recommendation Inequality Via Two‐Sided Matching: A Field Experiment Of Online Dating," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(3), pages 1201-1221, August.
    14. Pierre‐André Chiappori & Carlo Fiorio & Alfred Galichon & Stefano Verzillo, 2026. "Assortative Matching on Income," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 94(3), pages 957-989, May.
    15. Stanton, Christopher & Thomas, Catherine, 2025. "Who benefits from online gig economy platforms?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127806, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Suguru Otani, 2025. "Nonparametric Estimation of Matching Efficiency and Elasticity in a Marriage Agency Platform: 2014--2025," Papers 2505.00607, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    17. Liran Einav & Chiara Farronato & Jonathan Levin, 2016. "Peer-to-Peer Markets," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 615-635, October.
    18. Arnaud Dupuy & Alfred Galichon, 2014. "Personality traits and the marriage market," Post-Print hal-03470458, HAL.
    19. Pierre‐André Chiappori & Edoardo Ciscato & Carla Guerriero, 2024. "Analyzing matching patterns in marriage: Theory and application to Italian data," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), pages 737-781, July.
    20. Hanna Halaburda & Mikołaj Jan Piskorski & Pınar Yıldırım, 2018. "Competing by Restricting Choice: The Case of Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3574-3594, August.
    21. John A. List, 2025. "The Experimentalist Looks Within: Toward an Understanding of Within-Subject Experimental Designs," NBER Working Papers 33456, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    22. Pierre-André Chiappori & Sonia Oreffice & Climent Quintana-Domeque, 2020. "Erratum: Fatter Attraction: Anthropometric and Socioeconomic Matching on the Marriage Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(12), pages 4673-4675.
    23. Ignacio Rios & Daniela Saban & Fanyin Zheng, 2023. "Improving Match Rates in Dating Markets Through Assortment Optimization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1304-1323, July.
    24. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/361levbcs399s9oa154em6h9jl is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Corinne Low, 2024. "Pricing the Biological Clock: The Marriage Market Costs of Aging to Women," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(2), pages 395-426.
    26. Michèle Belot & Philipp Kircher & Paul Muller, 2019. "Providing Advice to Jobseekers at Low Cost: An Experimental Study on Online Advice," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(4), pages 1411-1447.
    27. Ravi Bapna & Jui Ramaprasad & Galit Shmueli & Akhmed Umyarov, 2016. "One-Way Mirrors in Online Dating: A Randomized Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(11), pages 3100-3122, November.
    28. Pierre-André Chiappori & Robert McCann & Lars Nesheim, 2010. "Hedonic price equilibria, stable matching, and optimal transport: equivalence, topology, and uniqueness," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(2), pages 317-354, February.
    29. Corinne Low, 2024. "The Human Capital–Reproductive Capital Trade-Off in Marriage Market Matching," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(2), pages 552-576.
    30. Andrey Fradkin & Monica Bhole & John J. Horton, 2026. "Competition Avoidance vs. Herding in Job Search: Evidence from Large-Scale Field Experiments on an Online Job Board," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1305-1323, February.
    31. Ong, David & Wang, Jue, 2015. "Income attraction: An online dating field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 13-22.
    32. Otani, Suguru, 2025. "Nonparametric estimation of matching efficiency and elasticity in a marriage agency platform: 2014–2025," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    33. Yujung Hwang & Áureo de Paula & Fangzhu Yang, 2025. "The rise of online dating and heterogamous marriages," IFS Working Papers W25/33, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    34. Raymond Fisman & Sheena S. Iyengar & Emir Kamenica & Itamar Simonson, 2006. "Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(2), pages 673-697.
    35. Arnaud Dupuy & Alfred Galichon, 2014. "Personality traits and the marriage market," SciencePo Working papers hal-03470458, HAL.
    36. Aloysius Siow, 1998. "Differential Fecundity, Markets, and Gender Roles," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(2), pages 334-354, April.
    37. David Ong, 2016. "Education and income attraction: an online dating field experiment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(19), pages 1816-1830, April.
    38. Egebark, Johan & Ekström, Mathias & Plug, Erik & van Praag, Mirjam, 2021. "Brains or beauty? Causal evidence on the returns to education and attractiveness in the online dating market," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    39. Arnaud Dupuy & Alfred Galichon, 2014. "Personality traits and the marriage market," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03470458, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chihiro Inoue & Yusuke Ishihata & Suguru Otani, 2026. "Marital Sorting on Pre-Marital Preferences for Household Behavior," Papers 2603.25372, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    2. Lippmann, Quentin & Surana, Khushboo, 2025. "The evolution of partner preferences: Evidence using matrimonial ads from Canada, France, India and the United States," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Quentin Lippmann & Khushboo Surana, 2022. "The Hierarchy of Partner Preferences," Discussion Papers 22/08, Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Anton Cheremukhin & Paulina Restrepo-Echavarria & Antonella Tutino, 2023. "Marriage Market Sorting in the U.S," Working Papers 2023-023, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, revised 25 Sep 2024.
    5. Marco Francesconi & Cheti Nicoletti & Khushboo Surana, 2026. "Gender role attitudes and marital sorting: implications for household inequality," IFS Working Papers W26/18, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Otani, Suguru, 2025. "Nonparametric estimation of matching efficiency and elasticity in a marriage agency platform: 2014–2025," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    7. Claudia Senik & Anne Solaz, 2025. "The price of youth: Income and Age-Hypergamy," PSE Working Papers halshs-04840609, HAL.
    8. Suguru Otani, 2025. "Nonparametric Estimation of Matching Efficiency and Elasticity in a Marriage Agency Platform: 2014--2025," Papers 2505.00607, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    9. Alfred Galichon & Marc Henry, 2026. "An econometrician's guide to optimal transport," Papers 2604.04227, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    10. Liang Chen & Eugene Choo & Alfred Galichon & Simon Weber, 2023. "Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium with Substitutes, with Applications to Matching and Discrete Choice Models," Papers 2309.11416, arXiv.org.
    11. Jérôme Adda & Paolo Pinotti & Giulia Tura, 2025. "There’s More to Marriage Than Love: The Effect of Legal Status and Cultural Distance on Intermarriages and Separations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(4), pages 1276-1333.
    12. Pierre‐André Chiappori & Edoardo Ciscato & Carla Guerriero, 2024. "Analyzing matching patterns in marriage: Theory and application to Italian data," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), pages 737-781, July.
    13. Salanié, Bernard & Chiappori, Pierre-André, 2021. "Mating Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 16041, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
      • Pierre-André Chiappori & Bernard Salanié, 2021. "Mating Markets," Working Papers 2021-016, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    14. You, Jing & Yi, Xuejie & Chen, Meng, 2021. "Love, life, and “leftover ladies” in urban China: Staying modernly single in patriarchal traditions," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Beloborodova, Anna, 2023. "Political views regarding the war in Ukraine in an online dating experiment," MPRA Paper 120739, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Edoardo Ciscato, 2026. "Trends and Structure of Educational Assortative Mating," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26121, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    17. Alfred Galichon & Simon Weber, 2024. "Matching under Imperfectly Transferable Utility," Papers 2403.05222, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    18. Egebark, Johan & Ekström, Mathias & Plug, Erik & van Praag, Mirjam, 2021. "Brains or beauty? Causal evidence on the returns to education and attractiveness in the online dating market," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Jose-Victor Rios-Rull & Shannon Seitz & Satoshi Tanaka, 2026. "What Women See in Men and Vice Versa: Estimates Based on Sex Ratios and Marriage Patterns," PIER Working Paper Archive 26-008, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    20. Alfred Galichon & Bernard Salani'e, 2021. "Cupid's Invisible Hand: Social Surplus and Identification in Matching Models," Papers 2106.02371, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.23325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.