IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ubfred/206384.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impacts of policies to implement the EU Water Framework Directive on development strategies and income of typical pig farms in an intensively farmed region of Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Garbert, Johanna
  • Holm-Mueller, Karin

Abstract

Agriculture is to a large extent responsible for missing the objective of the EU Water Framework, a good condition of water bodies in Germany and other parts of Europe. In Germany, in order to reach this target in future, the Fertilization Ordinance will be amended. Economic instruments would be another option to improve water quality. Against this background, the study examines impacts of such policies on farm strategies and income for certain fictitious, but typical farms that can be seen as representative for the most common pig farm types in the Muensterland, an intensively farmed region in Germany. From a number of farm development strategies, a mixed integer linear programming model identifies the best individual strategy for each policy and the resulting investments, production changes and income effects. The model results confirm that water protection policies decrease potential future incomes of typical pig farms. A tightening of the Fertilization Ordinance by reducing the phosphorus balances that must not be exceeded by the farms significantly reduces future income compared to an unchanged Fertilization Ordinance. The same applies to the introduction of levies on nutrient surpluses – along the lines of the Dutch policy. Nevertheless, future development strategies of the farms stay mainly the same in all scenarios with different water protection policies: Farms increase stable capacity in all scenarios. Along with this growth, manure export increases as well as the number of animals per hectare on the farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Garbert, Johanna & Holm-Mueller, Karin, 2015. "Impacts of policies to implement the EU Water Framework Directive on development strategies and income of typical pig farms in an intensively farmed region of Germany," Discussion Papers 206384, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ubfred:206384
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.206384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/206384/files/dispap15_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.206384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lengers, Bernd & Britz, Wolfgang, 2012. "The choice of emission indicators in environmental policy design: an analysis of GHG abatement in different dairy farms based on a bio-economic model approach," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 93(2).
    2. Oecd, 2007. "Instrument Mixes Addressing Non-Point Sources of Water Pollution," OECD Papers, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(8), pages 1-100.
    3. Balmann, Alfons & Lotze, Herrmann & Noleppa, Steffen, 1998. "Agrarsektormodellierung auf der Basis typischer Betriebe, Teil 1," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 47(05).
    4. Lengers, Bernd, 2012. "The choice of emission indicators in environmental policy design: an analysis of GHG abatement in different dairy farms based on a bio-economic model approach," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 93(02), pages 117-144, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. CARPENTIER, Alain & GOHIN, Alexandre & SCKOKAI, Paolo & THOMAS, Alban, 2015. "Economic modelling of agricultural production: past advances and new challenges," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    2. Viaggi, Davide & Raggi, Meri & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2011. "Farm-household investment behaviour and the CAP decoupling: Methodological issues in assessing policy impacts," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 127-145, January.
    3. Sanna Lötjönen & Esa Temmes & Markku Ollikainen, 2020. "Dairy Farm Management when Nutrient Runoff and Climate Emissions Count," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 960-981, May.
    4. Lengers, Bernd & Britz, Wolfgang & Holm-Müller, Karin, 2013. "Trade-off of feasibility against accuracy and cost efficiency in choosing indicators for the abatement of GHG-emissions in dairy farming," Discussion Papers 162877, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    5. Eory, Vera, 2015. "Evaluating the use of marginal abatement cost curves applied to greenhouse gas abatement in agriculture," Working Papers 199777, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    6. Britz, Wolfgang & Pérez-Dominguez, Ignacio & Narayanan, Gopalakrishnan Badri, 2015. "Analyzing Results from Agricultural Large-scale Economic Simulation Models: Recent Progress and the Way Ahead," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(02), June.
    7. Tzemi, Domna & Breen, James, 2019. "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through the use of urease inhibitors: A farm level analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 18-26.
    8. Britz, Wolfgang, 2014. "A New Graphical User Interface Generator for Economic Models and its Comparison to Existing Approaches," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 63(4).
    9. Remble, Amber & Britz, Wolfgang & Keeney, Roman, 2013. "Farm Level Tradeoffs in the Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150442, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Kahil, Mohamed Taher & Albiac, José, 2013. "Greenhouse gases mitigation policies in the agriculture of Aragon, Spain," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Britz, Wolfgang, 2014. "A New Graphical User Interface Generator for Economic Models and its Comparison to Existing Approaches," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 63(04), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Doole, Graeme J. & Romera, Alvaro J., 2014. "Implications of a nitrogen leaching efficiency metric for pasture-based dairy farms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 10-18.
    13. Rothe, Andrea & Lissitsa, Alexej, 2005. "Der ostdeutsche Agrarsektor im Transformationsprozess: Ausgangssituation, Entwicklung und Problembereiche [Agricultural sector of Eastern Germany during transition period – Initial situation, devel," IAMO Discussion Papers 81, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    14. Graeme J. Doole, 2010. "Evaluating Input Standards for Non‐Point Pollution Control under Firm Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 680-696, September.
    15. Happe, Kathrin & Balmann, Alfons, 2002. "Struktur-, Effizienz- und Einkommenswirkungen von Direktzahlungen," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(08), pages 1-13.
    16. Weinmann, Bernd & Sheridan, Patrick & Schroers, Jan Ole & Kuhlmann, Friedrich, 2005. "Modelling the CAP Reform at the Regional Level with ProLand," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24508, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Ahrens, H. & Bernhardt, F., 2000. "Modellierung von Wirkungen alternativer umweltpolitischer Szenarien auf die Landwirtschaft – Regional differenzierte Fallstudie für den Freistaat Sachsen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 36.
    18. Gren, Ing-Marie & Baxter, Peter & Mikusinski, Grzegorz & Possingham, Hugh, 2014. "Cost-effective biodiversity restoration with uncertain growth in forest habitat quality," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 77-92.
    19. Balmann, A. & Happe, K. & Kellermann, K. & Kleingarn, A., 2001. "Agricultural policy switchings – an agent-based approach," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    20. Lehmann, Paul & Schleyer, Christian & Wüstemann, Henry & Drechsler, Martin & Hagedorn, Konrad & Wätzold, Frank, 2005. "Promoting the multifunctionality of agriculture, forestry, and rural areas - design and implementation of public policies in Germany," UFZ Discussion Papers 12/2005, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Environmental Economics and Policy; Farm Management; Livestock Production/Industries;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ubfred:206384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zefbnde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.