IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of a nitrogen leaching efficiency metric for pasture-based dairy farms


  • Doole, Graeme J.
  • Romera, Alvaro J.


Improvement in nitrogen leaching efficiency (NLE)—the kilograms of milk solids produced per kilogram of nitrogen leached—has been proposed as one strategy to reduce the amount of nitrogen (N) leached from New Zealand dairy farms. A whole-farm optimisation model is used to assess the implications of NLE targets in the Waikato region of New Zealand. In the absence of NLE constraints, there is no relationship between NLE and farm intensification (measured in terms of the proportion of cow diet consisting of imported feed). Indeed, NLE remains stable between 25kg MS/kg N and 28kg MS/kg N as a greater amount of imported feed promotes N leaching, but also milk production. In the absence of a stand-off pad (a bark-covered loafing pad employed to reduce urine deposition on pasture), fixing higher levels of NLE decreases N leaching, but imposes an enormous cost on producers by encouraging higher levels of production through the purchase of costly, low-protein supplementary feed. By comparison, with the availability of a stand-off pad, higher levels of NLE allow reductions in leaching to occur at reasonable cost. Nevertheless, levels of N leaching varied significantly between simulated farming systems, depending on the level of NLE studied and variability in the economic environment. Indeed, the coarse relationship between N leaching and NLE infers that N leaching could easily increase under a policy that targets NLE, highlighting the general inadequacy of efficiency measurements for environmental regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Doole, Graeme J. & Romera, Alvaro J., 2014. "Implications of a nitrogen leaching efficiency metric for pasture-based dairy farms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 10-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:142:y:2014:i:c:p:10-18
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.04.018

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Doole, Graeme & Pannell, David J., 2011. "Evaluating environmental policies under uncertainty through application of robust nonlinear programming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1-18.
    2. David J. Pannell, 2006. "Flat Earth Economics: The Far-reaching Consequences of Flat Payoff Functions in Economic Decision Making," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(4), pages 553-566.
    3. Jay, Mairi, 2007. "The political economy of a productivist agriculture: New Zealand dairy discourses," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 266-279, April.
    4. Doole, Graeme J. & Romera, Alvaro J., 2013. "Detailed description of grazing systems using nonlinear optimisation methods: A model of a pasture-based New Zealand dairy farm," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 33-41.
    5. Oecd, 2007. "Instrument Mixes Addressing Non-Point Sources of Water Pollution," OECD Papers, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(8), pages 1-100.
    6. Doole, Graeme J., 2012. "Cost-effective policies for improving water quality by reducing nitrate emissions from diverse dairy farms: An abatement–cost perspective," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 10-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Doole, Graeme J. & Romera, Alvaro J., 2015. "Trade-offs between profit, production, and environmental footprint on pasture-based dairy farms in the Waikato region of New Zealand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 14-23.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:142:y:2014:i:c:p:10-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Haili He). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.