IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae05/24508.html

Modelling the CAP Reform at the Regional Level with ProLand

Author

Listed:
  • Weinmann, Bernd
  • Sheridan, Patrick
  • Schroers, Jan Ole
  • Kuhlmann, Friedrich

Abstract

The reform of the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) will fundamentally affect the decision behaviour of land users. So far transfer payments were coupled to specific forms of land use. The reform encourages land users to make decisions concerning production based solely on market aspects. The effects of the CAP reform on the Lahn Dill region in Germany are simulated with the spatially explicit land use model ProLand. The results show that land use decisions will be based stronger on site specific natural conditions than was the case in the Agenda 2000 scenario. The transfer payment volume directed into the region increases considerably.

Suggested Citation

  • Weinmann, Bernd & Sheridan, Patrick & Schroers, Jan Ole & Kuhlmann, Friedrich, 2005. "Modelling the CAP Reform at the Regional Level with ProLand," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24508, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae05:24508
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.24508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24508/files/cp05we02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.24508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibson, Clark C. & Ostrom, Elinor & Ahn, T. K., 2000. "The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 217-239, February.
    2. Balmann, Alfons & Lotze, Herrmann & Noleppa, Steffen, 1998. "Agrarsektormodellierung auf der Basis typischer Betriebe, Teil 1," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 47(05).
    3. Stomph, T. J. & Fresco, L. O. & van Keulen, H., 1994. "Land use system evaluation: Concepts and methodology," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 243-255.
    4. Möller, D. & Weinmann, B. & Kirschner, M. & Kuhlmann, F., 2000. "Zur Bedeutung von Umweltauflagen für die räumliche Verteilung land- und forstwirtschaftlicher Nutzungssysteme: GIS - basierte Modellierungen mir ProLand," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 36.
    5. Henrichsmeyer, Wilhelm, 1994. "Räumliche Verteilung der Agrarproduktion," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 43(04-05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viaggi, Davide & Bartolini, Fabio & Raggi, Meri & Sardonini, Laura, "undated". "The role of the Common Agricultural Policy in the spatial location of agricultural activities," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95242, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Costanza & Shuang Liu, 2014. "Ecosystem Services and Environmental Governance: Comparing China and the U.S," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 160-170, January.
    2. Grillitsch, Markus & Asheim, Björn & Fünfschilling, Lea & Kelmenson, Sophie & Lowe, Nichola & Lundquist, Karl Johan & Mahmoud, Yahia & Martynovich, Mikhail & Mattson, Pauline & Miörner, Johan & Nilsso, 2023. "Rescaling: An Analytical Lense to Study Economic and Industrial Shifts," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/11, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Saunders, Lindsay S. & Webb, Trevor H. & Barringer, James R. F., 1997. "Integrating economic data with spatial biophysical data to analyse profitability and risks of wheat production on a regional basis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 583-599, December.
    4. Dale Rothman & Patricia Romero-Lankao & Vanessa Schweizer & Beth Bee, 2014. "Challenges to adaptation: a fundamental concept for the shared socio-economic pathways and beyond," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 495-507, February.
    5. Burak Güneralp & Michael K Reilly & Karen C Seto, 2012. "Capturing Multiscalar Feedbacks in Urban Land Change: A Coupled System Dynamics Spatial Logistic Approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(5), pages 858-879, October.
    6. Merrie, Andrew & Olsson, Per, 2014. "An innovation and agency perspective on the emergence and spread of Marine Spatial Planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 366-374.
    7. Hengsdijk, H. & Bouman, B. A. M. & Nieuwenhuyse, A. & Jansen, H. G. P., 1999. "Quantification of land use systems using technical coefficient generators: a case study for the Northern Atlantic zone of Costa Rica," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 109-121, August.
    8. Poteete, Amy R. & Ostrom, Elinor, 2008. "Fifteen Years of Empirical Research on Collective Action in Natural Resource Management: Struggling to Build Large-N Databases Based on Qualitative Research," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 176-195, January.
    9. Garbert, Johanna & Holm-Mueller, Karin, "undated". "Impacts of policies to implement the EU Water Framework Directive on development strategies and income of typical pig farms in an intensively farmed region of Germany," Discussion Papers 206384, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    10. Elissa Waters & Jon Barnett, 2018. "Spatial imaginaries of adaptation governance: A public perspective," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 708-725, June.
    11. Hanna Ahlström & Amanda Williams & Emmy Wassénius & Andrea S. Downing, 2025. "Deepening the Conversation on Systemic Sustainability Risks: A Social-Ecological Systems Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(3), pages 495-506, July.
    12. Steven M Manson, 2007. "Challenges in Evaluating Models of Geographic Complexity," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(2), pages 245-260, April.
    13. Rothe, Andrea & Lissitsa, Alexej, 2005. "Der ostdeutsche Agrarsektor im Transformationsprozess: Ausgangssituation, Entwicklung und Problembereiche [Agricultural sector of Eastern Germany during transition period – Initial situation, devel," IAMO Discussion Papers 81, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    14. Lucia Vergano & Paulo A.L.D. Nunes, 2006. "Analysis and Evaluation of Ecosystem Resilience: An Economic Perspective," Working Papers 2006.25, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    15. Lopolito, Antonio & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Sica, Edgardo, 2022. "The role of proximity in sustainability transitions: A technological niche evolution analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    16. Happe, Kathrin & Balmann, Alfons, 2002. "Struktur-, Effizienz- und Einkommenswirkungen von Direktzahlungen," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(08), pages 1-13.
    17. Leandra R. Gonçalves & Mayara Oliveira & Alexander Turra, 2020. "Assessing the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems: Taking Stock of the Cross-Scale Dependence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Sarah Birrell Ivory & R. Bradley MacKay, 2020. "Scaling sustainability from the organizational periphery to the strategic core: Towards a practice‐based framework of what practitioners “do”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2058-2077, July.
    19. Heo, Cindy Yoonjoung & Kim, Bona & Park, Kwangsoo & Back, Robin M., 2022. "A comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Likert Scale methods on peer-to-peer accommodation attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 368-377.
    20. Fikret Berkes, 2017. "Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae05:24508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.