IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae17/261427.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How does land tenure reform impact upon pastoral livestock production? An empirical study for Inner Mongolia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Min
  • Heijman, Wim
  • Dries, Liesbeth
  • Zhu, Xueqin
  • Huang, Jikun

Abstract

How has land tenure reform affected livestock production in pastoral areas of China?This question is explored by estimating what impact assigning grassland use rights has on livestock production based on county-level data for Inner Mongolia between 1985 and 2008. The timing of the introduction of the household-based assignment of grassland use rights differed between counties, enabling a comparison of the effects of the land tenure reform. The changes in livestock production over time are examined by analysing data on changes in livestock population and meat output. The descriptive analysis shows that livestock production increased at a higher speed in the crop farming areas, but that the development of livestock productivity was faster in the pastoral areas. In the empirical analysis, we employed a fixed effects model to disentangle the effects of land tenure reform on livestock production from factors related to market forces, grassland condition, technological development and environmental heterogeneity. The model results reveal that the implementation of land tenure reform had significant and negative effects on the increase in livestock production, although total livestock production actually increased. It therefore appears that land reform is in itself unable to offset the impact of other factors that accelerate the increase in livestock production. Moreover, the constraining effect of land tenure reform on the increase in livestock production decreases with the number of years for which land tenure reform has been implemented, and ultimately disappears. Remarkably, the constraining effect of land tenure reform is stronger on the increase of livestock population than on that of meat output. This indicates that land tenure reform is beneficial in that it improves livestock productivity. In conclusion, land tenure reform, namely the privatisation of grassland use rights, puts a ceiling on livestock production, which could be a possible reason as to why it has been difficult to implement the reform on grasslands. However, the reform does prove to be beneficial in improving the livestock productivity of pastoral areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Min & Heijman, Wim & Dries, Liesbeth & Zhu, Xueqin & Huang, Jikun, 2017. "How does land tenure reform impact upon pastoral livestock production? An empirical study for Inner Mongolia, China," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261427, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae17:261427
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.261427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/261427/files/Liu%20M%20etal%20%282017%29%20How%20Does%20Land%20Tenure%20Reform%20Impact%20Upon%20Pastoral%20Livestock%20Production.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/261427/files/Liu%20M%20etal%20%282017%29%20How%20Does%20Land%20Tenure%20Reform%20Impact%20Upon%20Pastoral%20Livestock%20Production.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banks, Tony, 2003. "Property Rights Reform in Rangeland China: Dilemmas On the Road to the Household Ranch," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 2129-2142, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:chieco:v:55:y:2019:i:c:p:181-198 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae17:261427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.