IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9558-d621565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use

Author

Listed:
  • Qiuyue Xia

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Lu Li

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Jie Dong

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Bin Zhang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

The reduction of carbon emissions from land use (CELU) is critical for China to achieve carbon neutrality, which may be greatly facilitated by carbon trading policies. Previous studies of the emission reduction effects of carbon trading policies focused mostly on the reduction of carbon source emissions, and there is a lack of research from the comprehensive perspective of carbon sources and carbon sinks. Understanding the effect of carbon trading policies on emission reduction from the perspective of CELU may help to improve the evaluation system of carbon trading policies, as well as provide important implications for the construction of China’s carbon trading market in the context of global carbon neutrality. Here, based on China’s current carbon-trading pilot areas, quasi-natural experiments were conducted by using the CELU data from 2005 to 2017, the synthetic control method (SCM) and the mediation effect model, aiming to empirically study the reduction effect and mechanism of carbon trading policies on CELU. The following main findings were obtained. (1) Carbon trading policies have had a significant reduction effect on the average CELU of the pilot areas by at least four million tons per year during the study period. (2) The carbon emission reduction effect of carbon trading policies has certain regional heterogeneity. (3) Carbon trading policies reduce CELU through the intermediate effect of energy structure, whose contribution rate reaches 30.433%. (4) Carbon trading policies did not achieve the Porter effect of technological progress during the study period, and technological progress has no significant intermediate effect on the reduction of CELU by carbon trading policy. Based on the above findings, the following policy implications can be proposed. Carbon trading and carbon offset should be studied from a comprehensive perspective of land use; regional heterogeneity should be considered when promoting the carbon emission trading system nationwide; and the energy structure should be optimized continuously.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9558-:d:621565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9558/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9558/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Lin & Li, Fengyu & Zhang, Xian, 2016. "Chinese companies’ awareness and perceptions of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS): Evidence from a national survey in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 254-265.
    2. Zhang, Wei & Li, Jing & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Shucen, 2020. "Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Meijuan Liu & Chang Zhou & Feifei Lu & Xiaohan Hu, 2021. "Impact of the implementation of carbon emission trading on corporate financial performance: Evidence from listed companies in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Wang, Peng & Dai, Han-cheng & Ren, Song-yan & Zhao, Dai-qing & Masui, Toshihiko, 2015. "Achieving Copenhagen target through carbon emission trading: Economic impacts assessment in Guangdong Province of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 212-227.
    5. Raphael Calel & Antoine Dechezleprêtre, 2016. "Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(1), pages 173-191, March.
    6. Peter Newell & Adam Bumpus, 2012. "The Global Political Ecology of the Clean Development Mechanism," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 12(4), pages 49-67, November.
    7. Lu Li & Jie Dong & Yan Song, 2020. "Impact and Acting Path of Carbon Emission Trading on Carbon Emission Intensity of Construction Land: Evidence from Pilot Areas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Alberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal, 2003. "The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 113-132, March.
    9. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    10. Lin, Boqiang & Chen, Xing, 2018. "Is the implementation of the Increasing Block Electricity Prices policy really effective?--- Evidence based on the analysis of synthetic control method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 734-750.
    11. Zhao, Xin-gang & Jiang, Gui-wu & Nie, Dan & Chen, Hao, 2016. "How to improve the market efficiency of carbon trading: A perspective of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1229-1245.
    12. Qiong Wu & Kanittha Tambunlertchai & Pongsa Pornchaiwiseskul, 2021. "Examining the Impact and Influencing Channels of Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Markets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Zhou, Wei & Gao, Lan, 2016. "The impact of carbon trade on the management of short-rotation forest plantations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 30-35.
    14. Yao, Shiyue & Yu, Xueying & Yan, Sen & Wen, Shiyan, 2021. "Heterogeneous emission trading schemes and green innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Abadie, Alberto & Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens, 2010. "Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(490), pages 493-505.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiufan Zhang & Decheng Fan, 2022. "The Spatial-Temporal Evolution of China’s Carbon Emission Intensity and the Analysis of Regional Emission Reduction Potential under the Carbon Emissions Trading Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Xiaoping Li & Sai Hu & Lifu Jiang & Bing Han & Jie Li & Xuan Wei, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Research (2000–2020) on Land-Use Carbon Emissions Based on CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Runqing Zhu & Boqiang Lin, 2022. "How Does the Carbon Tax Influence the Energy and Carbon Performance of China’s Mining Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Junguo Hua & Di Zhu & Yunfei Jia, 2022. "Research on the Policy Effect and Mechanism of Carbon Emission Trading on the Total Factor Productivity of Agricultural Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Haotong Jiang & Liuyang Yao & Xueru Bai & Hua Li, 2023. "Dynamic Analysis and Simulation of the Feasibility and Stability of Innovative Carbon Emission Reduction Projects Entering the Carbon-Trading Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Gang Liu & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Land Zoning Management to Achieve Carbon Neutrality: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Peijia Wang & Ping Wang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Land Use Transition in the Background of Carbon Emission Trading Scheme Implementation: An Economic–Environmental Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Xuehui Yang & Jiaping Zhang & Lehua Bi & Yiming Jiang, 2023. "Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Ruiqi Wang & Huanchen Tang & Xin Ma, 2022. "Can Carbon Emission Trading Policy Reduce PM2.5? Evidence from Hubei, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Feng Liu & Yu Fu & Weiguo Wang, 2023. "Heterogeneous Effects of China’s Carbon Market on Carbon Emissions—Evidence from a Regression Control Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Rongxin & Tan, Zhizhou & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Does carbon emission trading scheme really improve the CO2 emission efficiency? Evidence from China's iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Gu, Guangtong & Zheng, Haorong & Tong, Lingyun & Dai, Yaxian, 2022. "Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Ruiqi Wang & Huanchen Tang & Xin Ma, 2022. "Can Carbon Emission Trading Policy Reduce PM2.5? Evidence from Hubei, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Chen, Xing & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Towards carbon neutrality by implementing carbon emissions trading scheme: Policy evaluation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Maximiliano Marzetti & Rok Spruk, 2023. "Long-Term Economic Effects of Populist Legal Reforms: Evidence from Argentina," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 65(1), pages 60-95, March.
    6. Tomasi, Silvia, 2022. "The (Non) impact of the Spanish “Tax on the Sun” on photovoltaics prosumers uptake," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Maogang Tang & Silu Cheng & Wenqing Guo & Weibiao Ma & Fengxia Hu, 2023. "Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11735-11767, October.
    8. Eugenie Dugoua, 2023. "Induced Innovation and International Environmental Agreements: Evidence from the Ozone Regime," CESifo Working Paper Series 10669, CESifo.
    9. Zhipeng Tang & Wenming Song & Jialing Zou, 2022. "The Early Effect of Black Land Protection Plan in Northeast China on Industrial Pollution Using Synthetic Control Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Brehm, Johannes & aus dem Moore, Nils & Gruhl, Henri, 2022. "Driving Innovation? – Carbon Tax Effects in the Swedish Transport Sector," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264085, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Sun, Yanming & Shen, Simiao & Zhou, Chuanyu, 2023. "Does the pilot emissions trading system in China promote innovation? Evidence based on green technology innovation in the energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Chaofeng Lyu & Shuxin Deng & Zewei Dai, 2023. "Emissions Trading Systems, Structure Adjustment and Air Pollution Reduction: Evidence from Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Cheng, Hao-Sen, 2021. "The impact mechanism of the ETS on CO2 emissions from the service sector: Evidence from Beijing and Shanghai," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Lessmann, Christian & Kramer, Niklas, 2024. "The effect of cap-and-trade on sectoral emissions: Evidence from California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Chen, Jiandong & Huang, Shasha & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Zhu, Zunhong, 2022. "Impact of sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme on pollution emissions intensity: A study based on the synthetic control method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. Kramer, Niklas & Lessmann, Christian, 2023. "The Effects of Carbon Trading: Evidence from California’s ETS," MPRA Paper 116796, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Dugoua, Eugenie, 2023. "Induced innovation and international environmental agreements: evidence from the ozone regime," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121317, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Liu, Zhiqing & Geng, Yong & Dai, Hancheng & Wilson, Jeffrey & Xie, Yang & Wu, Rui & You, Wei & Yu, Zhongjue, 2018. "Regional impacts of launching national carbon emissions trading market: A case study of Shanghai," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 232-240.
    19. Dugoua, Eugenie, 2021. "Induced innovation and international environmental agreements: evidence from the Ozone regime," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110859, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Che, Shuai & Wang, Jun, 2022. "Policy effectiveness of market-oriented energy reform: Experience from China energy-consumption permit trading scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9558-:d:621565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.