IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0253460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the implementation of carbon emission trading on corporate financial performance: Evidence from listed companies in China

Author

Listed:
  • Meijuan Liu
  • Chang Zhou
  • Feifei Lu
  • Xiaohan Hu

Abstract

With the development of ecological paradigm coupled with the relentless implementation of myriad environmental policies in China, the rapid development of carbon emission trading and carbon trading market has had a vital impact on the financial performance of enterprises at the microlevel. This study has sampled the A-share listed companies in China, from 2009 to 2018, and adopted the difference-in-difference (DID) method to investigate the effect of the carbon emission trading on corporate financial performance from the microlevel. Evidence showed that the implementation of carbon emission trading effectively improved the total asset-liability ratio of enterprises, though it reduced the value of the current capital market. Moreover, in the regions under strict legal environment, the enhancement effect of the total asset-liability ratio was more obvious, whereas in the regions under loose legal environment, the reduction effect of the value of the capital market was more obvious. Further analysis showed that the implementation of carbon emission trading could not promote Chinese enterprises to increase R&D investment. Hence the implementation of carbon emission trading has improved the level of non-business income of enterprises incorporated into the trading system, but its impact on the investment income of enterprises was not significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Meijuan Liu & Chang Zhou & Feifei Lu & Xiaohan Hu, 2021. "Impact of the implementation of carbon emission trading on corporate financial performance: Evidence from listed companies in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253460
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253460
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253460&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0253460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Yuning & Li, Meng & Xue, Jinjun & Liu, Yu, 2020. "Evaluation of effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Maogang Tang & Silu Cheng & Wenqing Guo & Weibiao Ma & Fengxia Hu, 2023. "Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11735-11767, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ning Xiang & Limao Wang & Shuai Zhong & Chen Zheng & Bo Wang & Qiushi Qu, 2021. "How Does the World View China’s Carbon Policy? A Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Hong, Zitao & Peng, Zhen & Zhang, Liumei, 2022. "Game analysis on the choice of emission trading among industrial enterprises driven by data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    3. Li, Yan & Feng, Tian-tian & Liu, Li-li & Zhang, Meng-xi, 2023. "How do the electricity market and carbon market interact and achieve integrated development?--A bibliometric-based review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Keyang Zhan & Zhengning Pu, 2025. "Carbon market and emission reduction: evidence from evolutionary game and machine learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Xiangnan Zhai & Xue Yang & Darko B. Vukovic & Daria A. Dinets & Qiang Liu, 2025. "Carbon Emissions Trading Policy and Regional Energy Efficiency: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Jia, Zhijie & Liu, Yu & Wu, Rongxin & Wen, Shiyan & Zhang, Hongzhi & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "Optimal policy packages under policy and preference heterogeneities to address climate change," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Zhang, Xiaoliang & Zheng, Xiaojia, 2024. "Does carbon emission trading policy induce financialization of non-financial firms? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Cheng, Hao-Sen, 2021. "The impact mechanism of the ETS on CO2 emissions from the service sector: Evidence from Beijing and Shanghai," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Zeng, Shihong & Li, Tengfei & Wu, Shaomin & Gao, Weijun & Li, Gen, 2024. "Does green technology progress have a significant impact on carbon dioxide emissions?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Wang, Yongpei & Yan, Qing & Yang, Jieru & Komonpipat, Supak & Zhang, Qian, 2024. "Can inter-provincial transmission reduce regional carbon emissions? Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Zhao Yang, 2023. "Can the Digitalization Reduce Carbon Emission Intensity?—The Moderating Effects of the Fiscal Decentralization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Chen, Zhongfei & Zhang, Xiao & Chen, Fanglin, 2021. "Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Gao, Yanyan & Zheng, Jianghuai, 2024. "The opposite innovation impacts of air and water pollution regulations: Evidence from the total emissions control policy in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Zhang, Wenyue & Li, Jianan & Sun, Chuanwang, 2022. "The impact of OFDI reverse technology spillovers on China's energy intensity: Analysis of provincial panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Yanxia Yu & Chenfei Qu & Tom Coupé & Mathilda Featherston-Lardeux & Andreas Loeschel & Arne R. Weiss & Da Zhang, 2025. "Did China’s Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 25/04, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    16. Ai, Hongshan & Zhou, Zhengqing & Li, Ke & Kang, Zhi-Yong, 2021. "Impacts of the desulfurization price subsidy policy on SO2 reduction: Evidence from China's coal-fired power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Liu, Jing-Yue & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2021. "Has carbon emissions trading system promoted non-fossil energy development in China?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    18. Jinru Wang & Zhenwu Shi & Jie Liu & Hongrui Zhang, 2023. "Promoting “NEVs Pilot Policy” as an Effective Way for Reducing Urban Transport Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Fei Bao & Zhenzhi Zhao, 2022. "“Takeover” and “Activation” Effects of National Strategies for Industrial Relocation—Based on the Perspective of Marketisation of Land Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    20. Hu, Yucai & Li, Ranran & Du, Lei & Ren, Shenggang & Chevallier, Julien, 2022. "Could SO2 and CO2 emissions trading schemes achieve co-benefits of emissions reduction?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.