Author
Listed:
- Shi, Xinjie
- Huangfu, Bingyu
- Zhang, Yan
- Hu, Peinan
- Gao, Xuwen
Abstract
This paper investigates the effects of grassland certification reform on grassland quality and livestock output in China. Using remote sensing and household surveyed data, we found that the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) of our research area decreased by 9.37% after the implementation of the certification reform. Two potential mechanisms can be responsible for the tragic ecological consequences. The initial factor is the intensified grassland fragmentation. Contiguous large-scale grasslands were divided into small-scale fragmented grasslands after the certification reform, resulting in increased grazing intensity. The imperfection of grassland use rights could be the second potential mechanism. Herders have transferred their grazing intensity from their personally owned grazing area to the leased grazing field due to the volatility of grassland tenure and the inadequacy of agreements. Conversely, the aggregate output of villages increased by 15.5%, and the grassland rental markets became more efficient. We contend that property rights reforms have increased the vulnerability of grassland ecology and the livelihoods of herders despite the anticipated enhancement in output resulting from the reforms. These findings suggest that the trade-off between grassland sustainability and livestock productivity capacity led by the grassland property rights reform has impeded the development of more comprehensive strategies to withstand grassland degradation.
Suggested Citation
Shi, Xinjie & Huangfu, Bingyu & Zhang, Yan & Hu, Peinan & Gao, Xuwen, 2025.
"Grassland Certification, Grazing Behavior, and Ecological Consequences: Evidence from Pastoral China,"
2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO
361156, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:aaea25:361156
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361156
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.