IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02095028.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Farmer adoption of plot- and farm-level natural resource management practices: Between rhetoric and reality

Author

Listed:
  • James Stevenson

    (CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR])

  • Bernard Vanlauwe

    (IITA - International Institute of Tropical Agriculture [Nigeria] - CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR])

  • Karen Macours

    (PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Nancy Johnson

    (CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR])

  • Lakshmi Krishnan

    (CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR])

  • Frank Place

    (CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR], IFPRI - International Food Policy Research Institute [Washington] - CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR])

  • David Spielman

    (IFPRI - International Food Policy Research Institute [Washington] - CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR])

  • Karl Hughes

    (ICRAF - World Agroforestry Center [CGIAR, Kenya] - CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR])

  • Paul Vlek

Abstract

There is a significant gap between the rhetoric of claims about adoption of farm-level natural resource management practices and the reality. New empirical evidence of low adoption from several developing countries suggests that on-farm natural resource management practices face significant constraints to adoption, and that they deliver heterogeneous private and public benefits. Five recommendations are given to the research community related to: targeting; scaling-up; the proper role of research; trajectories of diffusion; and measurement of environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • James Stevenson & Bernard Vanlauwe & Karen Macours & Nancy Johnson & Lakshmi Krishnan & Frank Place & David Spielman & Karl Hughes & Paul Vlek, 2019. "Farmer adoption of plot- and farm-level natural resource management practices: Between rhetoric and reality," Post-Print halshs-02095028, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02095028
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristina Janeckova Molnarova & Iris C. Bohnet & Kamila Svobodova & Kateřina Černý Pixová & Michael Daniels & Jan Skaloš & Kristýna Drhlíková & Hossein Azadi & Roman Zámečník & Petr Sklenička, 2022. "Does Increasing Farm Plot Size Influence the Visual Quality of Everyday Agricultural Landscapes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Nsabimana, Aimable & Adom, Philip Kofi, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects from integrated farm innovations on welfare in Rwanda," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    3. Abate, Gashaw T. & Bernard, Tanguy & Makhija, Simrin & Spielman, David J., 2023. "Accelerating technical change through ICT: Evidence from a video-mediated extension experiment in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Hughes, Karl & Morgan, Seth & Baylis, Katherine & Oduol, Judith & Smith-Dumont, Emilie & Vågen, Tor-Gunnar & Kegode, Hilda, 2020. "Assessing the downstream socioeconomic impacts of agroforestry in Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM), 2021. "Technological innovation and sustainable intensification: Highlights, lessons learned, and priorities for One CGIAR," PIM flagship insights 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Johnson, N., 2022. "Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care," IWMI Reports 329155, International Water Management Institute.
    7. Byerlee, Derek & Lynam, John K., 2020. "The development of the international center model for agricultural research: A prehistory of the CGIAR," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Johnson, N., 2021. "Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care," IWMI Books, Reports H050911, International Water Management Institute.
    9. Barrett, Christopher B. & Islam, Asad & Pakrashi, Debayan & Ruthbah, Ummul, 2021. "Experimental Evidence on Adoption and Impact of the System of rice Intensification," Working Papers 309950, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    10. Lobell, David B., 2020. "Viewpoint: Principles and priorities for one CGIAR," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Ndlovu, Nicholas. P. & Borrass, Lars, 2021. "Promises and potentials do not grow trees and crops. A review of institutional and policy research in agroforestry for the Southern African region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Macours, Karen & Behaghel, Luc & Gignoux, Jérémie, 2020. "Social learning in agriculture: does smallholder heterogeneity impede technology diffusion in Sub-Saharan Africa?," CEPR Discussion Papers 15220, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Angioloni, Simone & Jack, Claire & McCarry, Ronan, 2021. "Occupational Injury and Working Days Lost in Northern Ireland’s Farming Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(1), January.
    14. Fang, Ming & Chang, Chiu-Lan, 2023. "The role of COP26 commitment and technological innovation in depletion of natural resources: Evidence from BRICS countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Sadiq, Muhammad & Chavali, Kavita & Kumar, V.V. Ajith & Wang, Kuan-Ting & Nguyen, Phong Thanh & Ngo, Thanh Quang, 2023. "Unveiling the relationship between environmental quality, non-renewable energy usage and natural resource rent: Fresh insights from ten asian economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agriculture increases yields;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02095028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.