IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/pimfis/1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technological innovation and sustainable intensification: Highlights, lessons learned, and priorities for One CGIAR

Author

Listed:
  • CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets

Abstract

What are the key drivers of change in agrifood systems? What challenges do these drivers present to achievement of sustainable food and nutrition security at global, regional, and national scales? How can agricultural technologies, natural resource management practices, and investment in infrastructure address these challenges in ways that manage trade-offs, protect natural capital, and sustain the provision of ecosystem services? PIM researchers analyzed the consequences of a number of key drivers for the future development of food systems. The primary focus has been on climate change, population and income growth, food prices, and their combined effects on dietary preferences, health, and the environment, as well as on the role of changing technology and responses to investments in key components of the food system. A body of work comprised of ground-breaking original research and review studies was made possible by the successful building of a community of practice on foresight that brought together researchers across CGIAR with collaborators from academia and centers of excellence all over the world.

Suggested Citation

  • CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets, 2021. "Technological innovation and sustainable intensification: Highlights, lessons learned, and priorities for One CGIAR," PIM flagship insights 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:pimfis:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143961
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wiebe, Keith & Sulser, Timothy B & Dunston, Shahnila & Rosegrant, Mark W. & Fuglie, Keith & Willenbockel, Dirk & Nelson, Gerald C., 2020. "Modeling impacts of faster productivity growth to inform the CGIAR initiative on Crops to End Hunger," SocArXiv h2g6r, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James R. Stevenson & Karen Macours & Douglas Gollin, 2023. "The Rigor Revolution: New Standards of Evidence for Impact Assessment of International Agricultural Research," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 15(1), pages 495-515, October.
    2. Pemsl, Diemuth E. & Staver, Charles & Hareau, Guy & Alene, Arega D. & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Kleinwechter, Ulrich & Labarta, Ricardo & Thiele, Graham, 2022. "Prioritizing international agricultural research investments: lessons from a global multi-crop assessment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    3. Prager, Steven D. & Wiebe, Keith D., 2022. "Strategic foresight in One CGIAR: Gaps and needs in approaches and capacity," Other briefs January 2022, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Chan, Chin Yee & Prager, Steven & Balie, Jean & Kozicka, Marta & Hareau, Guy & Valera, Harold Glenn & Tran, Nhuong & Wiebe, Keith & Diagne, Mandiaye & Alene, Arega, 2021. "The Future of Food Security, Nutrition and Health for Agri-food Systems Transformation," SocArXiv qgn9u, Center for Open Science.
    5. Prager, Steven & Wiebe, Keith, 2021. "Strategic Foresight in the One CGIAR: Gaps and Needs in Approaches and Capacity," SocArXiv 7kfxv, Center for Open Science.
    6. Cenacchi, Nicola & Dunston, Shahnila & Gueneau, Arthur & Mason-D’Croz, Daniel & Mishra, Abhijeet & Pitois, Gauthier & Robertson, Richard D. & Robinson, Sherman & Rosegrant, Mark W. & Sulser, Timothy, 2024. "The International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): Model documentation for version 3.6," Research reports 148953, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. repec:osf:socarx:ybgsm_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Facheng Ye & G R Shi & Maria Aleksandra Bitner, 2021. "Global biogeography of living brachiopods: Bioregionalization patterns and possible controls," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-35, November.
    9. Kruseman, Gideon, 2022. "Understanding the regional landscape and contributions of crops to end hunger in the Global South: Towards a parsimonious foundation," SocArXiv ybgsm, Center for Open Science.
    10. Huang, Kaixing, 2024. "The Green Revolution, grain imports, and income divergence in the developing world," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Fuglie, Keith O. & Wiebe, Keith D. & Prager, Steven D. & Sulser, Timothy B. & Cenacchi, Nicola & Bonilla Cedrez, Camila & Willenbockel, Dirk, 2022. "Quantitative analysis to inform priorities for international agricultural research," IFPRI discussion papers 2133, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Christian Bux & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Erica Varese & Vera Amicarelli, 2022. "Economic and Environmental Assessment of Conventional versus Organic Durum Wheat Production in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; gender; policies; technology; capacity development; agriculture; sustainable intensification; intensification; food systems; women;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:pimfis:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.